Get Medieval with Your Justice and Charity

Last updated on: January 9, 2017 at 11:50 pm by Kyle Cupp

Get Medieval with Your Justice and Charity 2017-01-09T23:50:18-05:00 Kyle Cupp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Have free acts of charity ever been enough to solve large-scale social problems? Looking specifically at the Middle Ages, when Christian culture ruled, Elizabeth Stoker Bruenig says no:

Then, the church’s charitable giving was neither entirely separate from the state, nor strictly voluntary. On one hand, the church was perfectly happy to exact part of its income through the coercion of tithes, a kind of compulsory tax

[…]

But moreover, the church also spent endowments from the state, which were tax revenues, on welfare programs.

Kings and noblemen, writes Bruenig, “were required rather than encouraged to pass on tax revenues to the church for its charitable activities.” In medieval times, private charity primarily addressed the smaller-scale corporal works of mercy, the kinds of acts government usually isn’t involved in and that individuals, churches, and charitable organizations effectively assist with today. Funerals, for example. Charity had a proper role, but so did higher institutions, including the state. Christian theology demanded this cooperation among social institutions. It still does today.

It’s important to remember that, in the Christian perspective, human freedom is a means to an end. So are markets. So is private property. Private ownership and markets serve a primordial purpose: the universal destination of goods. To the extent that markets and the charitable giving of private property are insufficient to this purpose, they need to be supplemented. To the extent that ownership and markets work against this end, they need to be regulated.

Hence the Catechism, in its section on stealing, says that “political authority has the right and duty to regulate the legitimate exercise of the right to ownership for the sake of the common good.” If free markets and private charity were up to the task of achieving the common good, then political authority would have no such right and duty. But, we live in a fallen world, unable to share its goods freely and collectively to the benefit of all, and so we must use the means available to us as we strive for a just social order. These means include private ownership and individual charity, of course, but also church and state.

Kyle Cupp is the author of Living by Faith, Dwelling in Doubt. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter.

Policy

Theology

Charity

Elizabeth Stoker Bruenig

Freedom

Justice

Kyle Cupp

Previous Post

October 21, 2014

Critical Dogmatism

Next Post

October 29, 2014 Breaking: Pope Francis Is Not an Atheist

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Confessions Culture Current Events Family Life Hermeneutics Humor LEGO Sets Mindless Monday Question Personal Philosophy Policy Politics and Society Quotes Religion in Pop Culture Series Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2016 December 2015 August 2015 July 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Jesus teach about serving others?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Whoever wants to be great must be a servant Serve only family Never serve Only serve the rich