Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

KiwiMormon

Home
About

Home
Latter-day Saint
Callings and Revelation: What happens when things go bad?

Callings and Revelation: What happens when things go bad?

Last updated on: January 2, 2015 at 3:59 pm by Gina Colvin

Callings and Revelation: What happens when things go bad? 2015-01-02T15:59:07+13:00 Gina Colvin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Prayer for Mormons is an important ritual and symbol of our faith, and alongside our daily habits of prayer are some very grand expectations of revelation. Joseph Smith started all of this. When he prayed, the heavens opened and revelation poured in. And he expected the people to be similarly inspired and revelatory. Any argument that he was territorial in the revelatory department is patently defensible. He loved it when people got revelations (but he loved it better when they agreed with his revelations). He reveled in them and encouraged them. His most momentous spiritual occasions were occasions where the outpourings of the spirit rested upon all present.

So our religious legacy is an emphasis on revelation. Nowadays however, revelation tends to be a more ‘corporatised’ kind of revelation. Boyd Packer (bless his cotton socks) put paid to a generalised revelatory culture amidst the Mormons by his insistence on a hierarchy of revelation which looks like a “I can get it for you, but you can’t get it for me” sort of practice. Unlike Joseph Smith, revelation for Packer is orderly, hierarchical, procedural, perfunctory, and has definitive boundaries.

Unfortunately, it seems that Packer’s ideal holds sway a little more emphatically these days than Smiths but I do understand the need to ‘manage’ the masses. We simply couldn’t have millions of Mormons sending in their revelations to Church Administration for their prayerful consideration – it would take too many resources and who would they employ to do it? – its not the sort of thing you’d put in a job reference. “I recommend X for this position. X has an outstanding record of accurate revelations and comes with a huge thumbs up from God – I know this because God told me himself”.

I personally like the revelation thing. Its so hopeful, and on those occasions when spiritual synergy is at its peak, and everyone is having their Pentecost, its breathtaking. And there is this wonderful notion abroad, that if everyone is talking to God, we should all be getting the same answers. But what happens when we don’t?

What happens when Sister A feels overwhelmingly (after talking to God) that her call should be to auxiliary B? Then she has an interview which Bishop C and he, in collaboration with Counsellors D & E, feel an overwhelming impression that God told them that Sister A’s service is required in auxiliary F? In the current institutional context there seems to be only one of three possibilities:

1) Either God is telling them both different things

2) Sister A’s service could be equally valuable in auxiliary B & F, but all things considered B seems the best place at the moment.

3) Neither of them are listening to God and she should really be in G.

I asked Nathan about how he made sense of this contradiction and who he thought was wrong. He was emphatic about the fault lying with the individual, not the Bishopric. He thinks that the vestry have got a better handle on things because they have a bigger picture than the parishioner – which is a fair point.

However, I would argue that one of the more problematic notions we live with in Mormonism is that the revelation that comes from those in the upper echelons of the institution is somehow more revelatory than even we can get for ourselves. And much of how we operate as a church functions on this very notion of revelation. For some people this is the lynchpin of Mormonism.

A church leader once told me that he had to believe that God was revealing things to the church leaders or else all of this seemed for naught. This worried me some, not because I believe that we mortals and our church leaders are incapable of supernal interchanges with the divine, its that this notion of God revealing his will to us through a hierarchy of institutional power, seems a bit mechanistic and managerial, and frankly it has gotten the church in a load of proverbials in the past. Because, how do you take it back if its wrong? If you say a revelation comes from God through your superior authority, but you get it wrong, who is going to take the flack? In my experience its usually God.

Take for instance Brigham Young’s statement:

“..Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.” – JoD: vol.10 p. 110: (March 8, 1863)

It seems so far removed from any notions of sanctifying and transformative Christianity that it boggles the mind. Yet, here he was proclaiming his hotline to God, spewing out all of this hatred and justifying it to the people with a supposed seal of heavenly approval. If at his death bed he confessed, “I’m a racist pratt, got it from mum and dad, and should have shut my mouth” perhaps today our hymn book and our choirs would look at little more funked up and ‘gospel’ (and I’d be seriously into that).

So if we weren’t so hung up on the idea of revelation as pure streams of light and knowledge descending upon certain of the ‘chosen’ and filtering down to the masses, church leaders could back up a bit and say: “Whoah, BY was a product of his time and unrighteously used his authority to conflate matters heavenly with matters political.” or, “Perhaps, Joseph had a wee problem in that area and shouldn’t really have the cornered the adolescent help” or “GBH shouldn’t have given George Bush the thumbs up in conference”.

I wouldn’t mind, and I’m sure those thousands currently leaving the church in droves wouldn’t mind either. You see, I think we humans are better than we are given credit for by the brass at coping with each others foibles, and wouldn’t really be unseated if we saw it in our leaders. I think we’d be better at managing these supposed revelatory contradictions if we were a bit more exercised in it and had some language for it. We don’t need affectations of religious inerrancy to give us hope or even loyalty. What we need is more honesty, vulnerability, and humility – even if it does need more PR management than slick media clips of shiny happy mormons.

I wish I could capture the energy of revelation visibly on film. If we could see revelation I’m sure it would look like swirling trajectories of colour moving in us, around us, through us and toward us. I don’t truck with it being a single dimensional stream of knowing bouncing down the chain from God in its purest form until landing unadulterated in the laps of the people.

If we imagine our utopia or our Zion to be constructed like a Kandinsky, each one of us with our pot or pots of colour to contribute, then I think we might not be so territorial about revelation. If we imagined that each of us potentially has our own conduit to the divine our leaders might be seeking to harness that kind of transcendent energy for the good of our communities rather than being afraid of it because it stepped onto their sacred ground. We’d be open to the possibility that the topography that the seeds of revelation are planted in is as varied and as diverse as our own souls, and will eventually flower into its own unique and lovely species.

So back to the problem of poor good Sister A. I don’t think that either of them are wrong. The problem is with the strong discourses in our church which tend to work to micro-manage revelatory possibility into tidy units of institutional and hierarchical authority. If the interview was institutionally structured to be more probing, thoughtful, less closed ended, without the expectation of simply a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ – then perhaps we’d see more joyful ownership of Sister A’s own revelatory potential. Perhaps she would feel respected as she expressed her innermost convictions. In this respect I think we could do with a church culture which is a little less dependent, a little less eyes up the chain, and a little less fearful of giving more than our hands and our hearts to the cause. We’d be giving our souls as well.

Church Culture

Mormon corporate culture

Mormon Cultural Identity

Prayer

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 5, 2012

Tithing: Why New Zealanders have it harder than Americans

Next Post

February 9, 2012 Why Mormons Leave the Church: A Comment from the Antipodes

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Thoughtful Faith Adultery Apostasy Brigham Young BYU Church Culture Church Leadership Clergy Sex Abuse Community of Christ Divorce Excommunication faith crisis Faith Development Heavenly mother Heresy Indigenous Mormon James Fowler Jesus Christ John Dehlin Joseph Smith Kate Kelly LDS Church Politics LDS doctrine LDS Essays LGTB Maori Mormon marriage and family Mitt Romney Mormon church discourse Mormon church history Mormon Conservatism Mormon corporate culture Mormon Cultural Identity Mormon feminist politics Mormon finances mormon matters podcast Mormon Political Economy Mormons feminism New Zealand and US Mormonism New Zealand Mormon Culture New Zealand Mormon Feminist Thought New Zealand temple Official Declaration Two Ordain Women Pastoral Theology for Mormons phillip barlow Polygamy Practical Theology Prayer Protect LDS Children Racism in the LDS church Sexual Abuse temple recommend temple recommend interview Temples tyranny of certainty Uncategorized why mormons leave

Select a Month April 2020 December 2019 March 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 March 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king of Judah burned the scroll of Jeremiah's prophecy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehoiakim Josiah Zedekiah Hezekiah