Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

kermitzarleyblog

Conclusions of Ancient Jewish Interpretations of Daniel 7.13

Last updated on: February 20, 2025 at 10:42 am   by Kermit Zarley

0 Comments

Conclusions of Ancient Jewish Interpretations of Daniel 7.13 2025-02-20T10:42:16-07:00 Kermit Zarley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[This article is post #7, the last post of my seven-post review of Dr. Richard Bauckham’s first of his two-book series, “Son of Man:” Volume 1: Early Jewish Literature (Eerdmans, 2023), which is important to Christology. A release date for his yet unpublished volume 2 has not been given. Click here to go to post #1.]

Overview of the prophecies of Daniel 2 and 7

The title of this article is the title of the last chapter in Richard Bauckham’s book, “Son of Man:” Volume 1: Early Jewish Literature. He says this book is the most thorough monograph ever published on how early Jewish exegetes interpreted the Son of Man in The Parables of Enoch and Daniel 7, but also the Messianic Figure in other Tanakh (Old Testament) texts. He begins on p. 370 by reiterating the 6th century BCE prophecies of Daniel 2 and 7 which coincide. They predict the four successive empires of the Mediterranean world—Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome—wherein the last three occurred afterwards in history. Both prophecies taken together predict that the kingdom of God will fall like a stone from heaven, crashing down upon the Roman Empire (Daniel 2.34-35, 44-45), and it will be led by “one like a son of man” (7.13). The early Christians generally believed this “son of man” was Jesus of Nazareth, a title he often used for himself.

Daniel’s “Son of Man” Is a Man, Not a Symbol

Bauckham then relates concerning the Tanakh (p. 371), “In all of the [early Jewish written] sources, the figure in Daniel 7.13 is undoubtedly understood to represent an individual, who can be identified with individual Messianic Figures in other prophecies. That the ‘one like a son of man’ [in Daniel 7.13] is an individual, not a symbol for ‘the holy ones of the Most High’ [v. 22], is already clear in the Old Greek version of Daniel, which distinguishes, within the vision, between the holy ones and the ‘one like a son of man.’ A ‘corporate’ understanding of the humanlike figure is similarly absent from these sources.” In modern times, most exegetes of Dan 7.13 have viewed “one like a son of man” as an angel or a symbol of Jewish saints, thus not a literal man.

Bauckham repeatedly states this in his book in opposition to the prevailing notion by modern scholars that ‘the one like a son of man’ in Daniel 7.13 does not depict a human being but symbolizes the holy people of Israel. (See “The Son of Man” in my book, The Restitution: Biblical Proof Jesus Is NOT God, pp. 164-183, wherein I agree with him.)

Bauckham Admits,”I Was Wrong”

As I stated in a previous post, Dr. Bauckham—who is British and one of the eminent New Testament scholars in the world—had revealed in the preface of this book (p. ix), “What convinced me that such an extensive discussion of this topic was worthwhile was that, as I entered into more detailed study of every part of it, I frequently found, not only that I was coming up with new observations and conclusions, but also that these were unexpected and surprising to me.” Then, on p. 101 in this book, he admits that he thought the author of “The Parables of Enoch” had portrayed “one like a son of man” in Daniel 7.13 as both a man and a divine being, which is how most Christians are taught about Jesus. Bauckham then admits concerning The Parables, “Detailed study of the Parables has convinced me that I was wrong.” This is an interesting admission from the professor since he, like most conservative Christian scholars, is Trinitarian.

Dr. Bauckham further elaborates at the end of this book (p. 374), “The humanity of the ‘one like a son of man’ relates to what is probably the most unexpected result [by him] of this study. It is that in all these [early Jewish literary] sources,… this figure is understood to be a human who had been born and lived on earth in the past and is now being preserved by God in paradise or heaven until the time of the end when he will fulfill the role of the Messiah described in Daniel 7 and other prophecies.” This comports completely with the New Testament presentation of Jesus’s death, resurrection, and heavenly ascension, where he sits with God on God’s throne until the yet future time of his second coming (cf. esp. Psalm 110.1).

Bauckham continues (p. 375), “In the interpretations of Daniel 7 we have studied, the Messiah has been born on earth in the past and will come in the future from heaven. This is remarkably close to the way early Christians read Daniel 7, a comparison that will be explored in part 3 of this work,” meaning his Volume 2. However, later, during the ecumenical councils of the 4th and 5th centuries, Catholic Church bishops changed this primitive, Jewish understanding about the Son of Man’s identity (Jesus) to him being a God-man who had always preexisted as “Logos-Son.” Yet Bauckham concludes concerning pre-Christian Jewish exegetes who interpreted “one like a son of man” in Daniel 7.13 that for them, “Messiah would come as a man from heaven but he did not originate from heaven.” Christians are taught the Incarnation—that Jesus eternally preexisted in heaven as the Logos-Son and then came to earth to become a man.

Conclusion

Dr. Bauckham is a Trinitarian and therefore believes Jesus is both man and God. He is well known in his writings for coining the expression “the unique divine identity” and applying it to Jesus. Now that he has changed his mind about early Jewish literature, especially The Parables of Enoch and “one like a son of man” in Daniel 7.13, that they do not say this figure or the Messianic Figure in other biblical texts is both man and God, I am wondering how Dr. Bauckham in Volume 2 of this two-book series will reconcile this new observation with his belief that Jesus is both of these figures and that he is a God-man. So, I look forward with much anticipation to see how the distinguished British professor and fellow of the British Academy will treat Jesus in the New Testament as “the Son of Man.”

[See Kermit’s two books that relate to this book review: The Restitution: Biblical Proof Jesus Is NOT God and The Gospel Corrupted: When Jesus Was Made God.]

 

History and Religion

Jesus

Old Testament

Daniel's Son of Man

Early Jewish Beliefs

Parables of Enoch

Richard Bauckham

Son of Man Study

Previous Post



February 19, 2025

Josephus Was an Accomplished Historian and Biblical Exegete

Next Post



February 21, 2025 Trump's "America First" Policy May Make "America Last"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Glen, you seem to be advocating a preterist viewpoint, with which I disagree." I'm a ..."

Kermit Zarley


Family Estrangement Versus Honoring Father and ..."

"THESIS is a SCRIPTURE QUOTE.“Remember the predictions foretold by the holy prophets and by the ..."

glen smith


Family Estrangement Versus Honoring Father and ..."

"How are they going to answer it. They don't have unlimited financial resources. They're trying ..."

Kermit Zarley


Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Getting Much Worse

"...but isn't that an important question to answer?"

Harold Porter


Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Getting Much Worse


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Angels Billy Graham Blog Description Book Reviews Christian Living Christianity Christology Church History Current Events Deity of Christ? Disarmament Eschatology Evangelicalism Ezekiel 38-39 Film Reviews God Golf Gospel Harmonization Health History Holy Spirit Incarnation? Interview Islam Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Jesus Last Empire Literary Announcements Major Championship Winners Masters Monotheism My Books New Testament Old Testament Politics Primitive Weapons Ryder Cup Science Society of Biblical Literature The Bible The Restitution of Jesus Christ Trinitarianism Trinity? Uncategorized Unconditional Love? War on Terrorism

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Beersheba" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

House of the King Blessed Field Valley of Water Well of the Oath

Books by This Author Books by Kermit Zarley Blog

See All Titles »

Related posts from Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Stephen Hawking Said "Losers" Boast about IQ—That's Trump

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Trump Should Retake his Old Name Drumpf that...

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Counting the Cost Before Going to War

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Financial Disclosure: Trump Profits Billions as President

Kermit Zarley Blog

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube