Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

kermitzarleyblog

Did Jesus Abolish Moses’ Food Laws?

Last updated on: April 28, 2025 at 11:50 am   by Kermit Zarley

0 Comments

Did Jesus Abolish Moses’ Food Laws? 2025-04-28T11:50:26-07:00 Kermit Zarley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I wrote my book, Moses Predicted COVID-19, hurriedly during the early months of COVID-19, thus in the spring of 2020. I explain in the preface that I did so because of the pandemic and that I was limited in my research due to libraries being closed from the nation’s shutdown.

The thesis of my book is that there is a mysterious connection between the past nine pandemics–from the Spanish Flu of 1918 to the present–and Moses’ food laws about eating meat in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. All of those pandemics were caused by a coronavirus transmitted from an animal to a human, called zoonosis. And all four of types of animals that are believed to have caused those nine pandemics are declared as “unclean” in Moses’ food laws and therefore forbidden to be eaten.

Bats have been the main culprit. They are believed to have caused four of those nine pandemics if bats caused COVID-19, as generally believed. Now, I don’t therefore claim that all people should eat kosher, as orthodox Jews do in observance of Torah. But I do conclude in the book that the whole world should recognize this connection and thus give wild animals that Moses deems “unclean” their space. Human civilization has increasingly been encroaching on their habitat and thereby causing some of these deadly, zoonosis diseases.

But for Christians, especially Bible scholars, there is especially one biblical text that many would cite in opposing the thesis of my book. Therefore, I have a chapter about it in the book. It is about an altercation that Jesus had with religious authorities in which they blamed his disciples for eating food with unwashed hands. They cited their “tradition of the elders.” It was that any Jew who eats food with unwashed hands has defiled that food which then enters their stomachs.

This pericope is recorded in Matthew 15.1-20 and Mark 7.1-23. Almost all English Bibles translate Mark 7.19b, “Thus he [Jesus] declared all foods clean” (NRSV). And in the NRSV and some other versions, these words are placed in parenthesis, signifying it is an explanatory remark by the author of that gospel. Thus, this rendering means very clearly, as scholars acknowledge, that in this pericope Jesus abolished Moses’ food laws. I strongly opposed this in my book by providing several reasons.

First, Moses’ food laws regard only the eating of meat, whereas these religious authorities were talking about eating any food, not just certain meats, with unwashed hands. So, it is a changing of the subject matter to say that Jesus abolished Moses’ food laws about eating meat when these religious authorities were not talking about that at all but about how you eat, and eat all food, with washed or unwashed hands. Thus, the above rendering in Mark 7.19b is not according to the context of the discussion.

Second, I claim in my book that translators err both in how they translate Mark 7.19b and placing it in parenthesis. I say it was part of Jesus’ saying, and those words in the Greek text–panta ta bromata katharizon–do not mean Jesus was abolishing Moses’ food laws. A comparison of the Matthew pericope supports this.

Third, my main biblical support is Jesus’ important saying at the beginning of his public ministry. In his so-called Sermon on Mount he said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law [of Moses] or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill” (Matt. 5.17). Thus, to say that in Mark 7.19b Jesus abolished Moses food laws contradicts what Jesus said earlier in his Sermon on the Mount.

Fourth, Jesus certainly did not overturn Moses’ food laws by what he said regarding eating with unwashed hands because, if he did and those religious authorities recognized that, it would have been prime evidence to cite at his hearing/trial before the Sanhedrin when they tried to find anything Jesus had taught that would have been contrary to the Law of Moses in order to accuse him blasphemy and thus call for the death penalty, which they did but for an entirely different reason.

So, because I was not able to research many commentaries of the Gospel of Mark when I wrote my book, as I ordinarily would have done, last year I went to Phoenix Seminary library and did so. And I found some interesting remarks. So many commentaries on Mark conclude what I said in the book, that many such Christian scholars say in them at Mark 7.19b that Jesus abolished Moses’ food laws. They include distinguished scholars such as R. T. France, C. E. B. Cranfield, Robert A. Guelich, Joel Marcus, Francis J. Moloney. Robert Gundry, in his commentary on Mark, is typical by saying of Mark 7.19b, “the following editorial phrase” represents “an abrogation of all food laws.”

Matthew Thiessen is an authority on the so-called “historical Jesus” debate. His book, Jesus and the Forces of Death: The Gospels’ Portrayal of Ritual Impurity within First-Century Judaism, was published in July, 2020, right after my book was published. In it, I think he interprets this pericope in Mark 7.1-23 very well. Moreover, his treatment of it is far more thorough and therefore thoughtful in a book about ritual impurity, which is what Jesus was being questioned about, than any commentary on a Bible book would be.

Thiessen asks (p.189), “How likely is it that Mark would stress obeying God’s commandments in a story in which Jesus rejects God’s commandments as they pertain to the consumption of impure animals?”

Thiessen then asserts (p. 191), “Mark 7 does not necessarily intend to depict the Pharisees as claiming that Jesus and his disciples have abandoned the law of Moses.”

Thiessen explains (p. 192), “The entire context of the clause of Mark 7:19 (‘purifying all foods’) situates this statement within a debate about whether one must ritually wash one’s hands prior to eating. That is to say, the story simply does not intend to deal with the question of whether one should eat pork or shellfish.”

Thiessen continues (p. 194), “Consequently, any reading of this story that depicts Jesus as rejecting God’s commandment to Israel [through Moses] to avoid eating unclean animals results in a Jesus who is irrational at best, and deeply hypocritical at worst. Is Mark so bumbling a narrator that he fails to notice this result?”

Thissen concludes (p. 195), “Nothing suggests that the Gospel writers intended to portray Jesus rejecting the Jewish dietary laws” as given by Moses (p. 195).

[See also my post, “Jesus Didn’t Abolish the Mosaic Food Laws.]

Health

The Bible

COVID-19

Eating with Unwashed Hands

Matthew Thiessen

Moses' food laws

Previous Post



October 17, 2022

Trump's Anti-Semitic Remarks Yesterday

Next Post



October 21, 2022 Why Charles Darwin Was Agnostic?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Angels Billy Graham Blog Description Book Reviews Christian Living Christianity Christology Church History Current Events Deity of Christ? Disarmament Eschatology Evangelicalism Ezekiel 38-39 Film Reviews God Golf Gospel Harmonization Health History Holy Spirit Incarnation? Interview Islam Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Jesus Last Empire Literary Announcements Major Championship Winners Masters Monotheism My Books New Testament Old Testament Politics Primitive Weapons Ryder Cup Science Society of Biblical Literature The Bible The Restitution of Jesus Christ Trinitarianism Trinity? Uncategorized Unconditional Love? War on Terrorism

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for "confession" to a priest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterians Baptists Methodists Catholics

Books by This Author Books by Kermit Zarley Blog

See All Titles »

Related posts from Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Acclaimed Author Kurt Andersen Identifies Trump as a...

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Ebola Is Spreading in The Democratic Republic of...

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Why The World's Population Replacement Rates Are in...

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Tucker Carlson Apologizes to America for Helping Elect...

Kermit Zarley Blog

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

Looking For Good Catholic Writing - October 2026

He alone extends the heavens, and he walks upon the waves of...

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube