BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
-
Categories
-
Christian Living
-
Christology
-
Golf
-
My Books
- Home
- Progressive Christian
- Religion News
- Is Jesus’ Atonement Universal or Limited?
Is Jesus’ Atonement Universal or Limited?
Last updated on: November 13, 2018 at 10:33 pm by Kermit Zarley
Is Jesus’ Atonement Universal or Limited? 2018-11-13T22:33:34-07:00 Kermit Zarley
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Throughout the history of Christianity, this has been a major question theologians have debated. And systematic theologians often have made it a plank in their system. Best known is John Calvin’s systematic theology that is most easily characterized by the acronym TULIP. The third letter, L, represents Limited Atonement. So, Calvin taught that Jesus’ sacrificial, atoning death for the sins of others is limited in its application to only the elect, that is, those who are God’s people.
Christians who believe in limited atonement usually embrace all the rest of Calvin’s theological system: T=Total Depravity, U=Unconditional Election, L=Limited Atonement, I=Irresistible Grace, P=Perseverance of the Saints. These are called “the five points of Calvinism.” But of these five, I only believe in limited atonement and thus reject the other four points of Calvinism.
Early in my theological education, I was taught that Jesus died for all peoples’ sins, so that his atonement is applied universally to all people, except for one sin–the sin of unbelief. Accordingly, you were not in your sins (or your sins were not on you) except for one, the sin of unbelief, until you believed. And that sin of unbelief is to not believe that Jesus died for your sins. After so many years, I concluded that this teaching was incompatible with the Bible.
When Christians discuss these matters, there often needs to be some precision in language. So it is in discussing Jesus’ atonement. When I say now that I believe Jesus’ atonement is limited, I only mean it is limited in its application to people. That is, Christians experience Jesus’ sacrificial death for them because they have believed in it. People who do not believe Jesus died for their sins do not experience this atonement. That is, it is not their possession. So, Jesus’ atonement is limited in its application and consequently not applied universally to all people.
On the other hand, God offered Jesus’ sacrificial, atoning death to all people as the only remedy for their sin problem. For all people have sinned and thus were separated from God (Ephesians 2.1). The only way they could solve their sin problem, and thereby be reconciled to God, is by believing in his remedial offer of Jesus’ atoning death for their sins.
So, Jesus atoning death is universally available to all people through faith in Jesus, but it is restricted in its application, thus limited in experience, only to those who believe in it. I think there are numerous ways to see this in scripture.
First and foremost is the animal-sacrificial system of ancient Israel. Either the priest or the father of a family would typically bring a sheep or goat before the altar in the temple at Jerusalem, place his hands on the animal’s head, and confess sins. The priest would then slit the animal’s throat, and it would bleed to death. The sins of Israel, or those of the father and his family, were figuratively transferred to that innocent animal. And this atoning act was particular in that it was applied only to Israel or that family. There was no other remedy for sins to be atoned, which means “covered.” Without the shedding of blood, there was no remission of sin. These sacrificial animal deaths were a type that prefigured Jesus dying for the sins of others as “the Lamb of God” (John 1.29, 36; Revelation 5.6).
Second, regarding the foremost Old Testament text which so graphically portrays Jesus’ atoning death, which is Isaiah 53, Yahweh says, The righteous one, my servant, shall make many righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities…. he poured out himself to death,… he bore the sin of many” (vv. 11-12 NRSV). Jesus may have alluded to this text when he said of himself, “For the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Mark 10.45). And during the Last Supper, when Jesus instituted the communion service that would historically become such a wonderful symbol of his atoning death for others, he said of it, “This is my blood of the covenant which is poured out for many” (Mark 14.24).
Notice that both Isaiah and Jesus say this atoning sacrifice is for “many” rather than “all.” I think this “many” refers to those who will experience it, thus its application and not its offer. When it is applied, that is when God initially forgives a person of his or her sins and that person becomes born again, thus a real Christian (John 3.3).
Third, Jesus proclaimed, “I am the light of the world” (John 8.12). Then he said to his unbelieving Jewish interlocutors concerning his imminent death and resurrection, “I am going away, and you will search for me, but you will die in your sin…. I told you that you would die in your sins, for you will die in your sins unless you believe that I am he” (vv. 21, 24). What did Jesus mean by that identification? He meant he was the light of the world. And his thrice repeated statement about them dying in their sins requires that they at that moment were positionally in their sins. Their only remedy available for them to be positionally separated from their sins, synonymous with their sins taken away, was to believe Jesus was the light of the world and therefore the light to them personally. If they believed this, after Jesus soon died and arose from the dead they would be able to understand and believe that he had died for their sins. So, people would then be positionally in their sins or not in their sins, and it would be all because of what they about Jesus’ death.
Fourth, in the Apostle Peter’s second sermon that is recorded in the book of Acts, he concludes his message about Jesus’ death by declaring to the Jewish multitude, “Repent therefore, and turn to God so that your sins may be wiped out” (Acts 3.19). Notice that he says a person who repents of their sins and turns to God by faith in Jesus will have their sins “wiped out,” which means forgiven.
So, putting these scriptures together, a person is either in their sins or forgiven of their sins by having them wiped out. The common evangelistic question in the New Testament is whether or not a person has had his or her sins forgiven. In fact, the common evangelistic question for a long time among Christians finds no basis in scripture–Will you go to heaven when you die? The main issue regarding a person’s eternal destiny is what to do about their sin problem, and Jesus has the answer. Their sins either would be on them or on Jesus, with his atonement being universally offered, but limited in its application.
Previous Post

December 4, 2017
Trump to Weigh In on Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Wednesday
Next Post

December 6, 2017 Trump to Move U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Angels Billy Graham Blog Description Book Reviews Christian Living Christianity Christology Church History Current Events Deity of Christ? Disarmament Eschatology Evangelicalism Ezekiel 38-39 Film Reviews God Golf Gospel Harmonization Health History Holy Spirit Incarnation? Interview Islam Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Jesus Last Empire Literary Announcements Major Championship Winners Masters Monotheism My Books New Testament Old Testament Politics Primitive Weapons Ryder Cup Science Society of Biblical Literature The Bible The Restitution of Jesus Christ Trinitarianism Trinity? Uncategorized Unconditional Love? War on Terrorism
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Who betrayed David to Absalom, offering counsel that was not followed?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Ahithophel Abiathar Joab Zadok
Books by This Author Books by Kermit Zarley Blog
Related posts from Kermit Zarley Blog
Family Estrangement Versus Honoring Father and Mother
Christians Are Not Sexual Prudes as the Media...
Scottie Scheffler Wins the Tour Championship
Wyndam Clark Wins BMW Championship
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...
Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...
The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...
The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...
We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...
Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis
Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....
When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts
Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...
Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...
view all Progressive Christian blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











