Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
About
Christology
Israel/Palestine
Publications
KermitZarley.com
Archives
Categories
- Angels
- Blog Description
- Book Reviews
- Christian Living
  - Unconditional Love?
- Christianity
- Christology
  - Deity of Christ?
  - Holy Spirit
  - Incarnation?
  - My Change
  - Trinity?
- Church History
- Current Events
- War on Terrorism
- Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
- Eschatology
- Ezekiel 38-39
- Last Empire
- Primitive Weapons
- Film Reviews
- God
- Golf
  - Billy Graham
  - Karsten Solheim
  - Lee Trevino
  - Major Championship Winners
  - Masters
  - Purpose
  - Ryder Cup
- Gospel Harmonization
- Interview
- Islam
- Jesus
- Literary Announcements
- Monotheism
- My Books
  - The Restitution of Jesus Christ
- Old Testament
- Politics
- Society of Biblical Literature
- The Bible
- Trinitarianism
- Uncategorized
FREE NEWSLETTER

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
On Who Jesus Is, Do You Listen to Jesus or to Church Fathers?

On Who Jesus Is, Do You Listen to Jesus or to Church Fathers?

Last updated on: November 23, 2018 at 12:03 pm by Kermit Zarley

On Who Jesus Is, Do You Listen to Jesus or to Church Fathers? 2018-11-23T12:03:37-07:00 Kermit Zarley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is a difference. I’m referring to post-apostolic, institutional, Catholic church fathers of the 2nd through at least the 5th centuries. I mean their extant writings and creeds drafted at their so-called “ecumenical councils.” At their first one, the Nicene Council of 325, they drafted the Nicene Creed signed by over 300 bishops that says Jesus is “very God of very God.” They mean he is just as divine as the God, whom Jesus called “Father,” that is, the God of creation. But that is NOT who Jesus said he was.

At the second ecumenical council, the first Council of Constantinople in 381, Catholic church fathers augmented the Nicene Creed by including in it that God is triune–three persons. Jesus certainly never said anything like that about the God he worshiped.

Jesus’ baptism in the waters of the Jordan River by his cousin, John the Baptist, was a most pivotal event in the life of Jesus. The New Testament tells us it was the beginning of his itinerant ministry of preaching the kingdom of God, healing people, and casting out demons. It happened mostly in Galilee, where he lived. But sometimes Jesus visited Jerusalem to attend the Jewish feasts, just as the Law of Moses had required.

Something very dramatic happened when Jesus was baptized. It was important for people to know about this Jesus of Nazareth. Why? He was about to reveal, to manifest, the God he would preach about in his mission. When John baptized him, Jesus rose up out of the waters, and a voice came from above that said, “This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased” (Matt. 3.17; Mark 1.11; Luke 3.22). This message obviously came from the God whom Jesus worshiped. God identifying Jesus as his Son does not mean Jesus is God but that Jesus had a most extraordinary relationship with God. The implication of these words is that whatever Jesus says about himself and his God, people should pay attention to it more than to any other voice.

The same thing happened at Jesus’ Transfiguration. A voice from above said the same words except something was added to them. This event seems to have occurred during the middle, or a little earlier, in Jesus’ two-to-three year ministry. Jesus led his three closest apostles–Peter and the brothers James and John–up on a “high mountain,” and Jesus was “transfigured before them” (Matt. 17.2). “His face shone like the sun, and His garments became as white as light” (v. 2 NASB). A cloud overshadowed them. Apparently, the same voice sounded from above as at Jesus’ baptism, saying, “This is my beloved son, with whom I am well pleased. Listen to him” (v. 5). So, God told these three apostles of Jesus to listen to what Jesus says.

Jesus’ identity is so central to Christian belief. As church councils often determined, getting Jesus’ identity correct was crucial to being a Christian and thus to have eternal life that Jesus made possible for his people to inherit by believing in his subsequent death on the cross that represented a payment for their sins. So, if we are going to do what God said at the Transfiguration, we should listen to what he said of his identity in his sayings recorded in the New Testament gospels. If what Jesus said of his identity differs from what church fathers later said about it, we should listen to Jesus rather than those church fathers.

I think the most enlightening thing to do about learning Jesus’ identity is to get a red letter Bible and read only those statements in red, which contain all of the NT gospels sayings of Jesus. I was a Trinitarian for twenty-two years, and then one day I began to question it while I was reading Jesus Olivet Discourse. I became perplexed at Jesus’ statement about not knowing the time of his return (Matt. 24.36). So I went to my Christian bookstore, bought a red-letter Bible, and read only the words in red–Jesus’ sayings. To my surprise, I learned Jesus never said he was God or anything like it. The closest I he ever came to that was his statement, “I and the Father are one” (John 10.30). But I thought that saying more readily meant they were unified than what Nicene and Post-Nicene church fathers said, that they were of the same “essence,” making Jesus God.

So, who did Jesus say he was? That is such an important question that arose numerous times among people who heard Jesus teach and preach and saw him perform many wonders, many of which delivered people from their infirmities and demons. The first time this question arose in Jesus’ ministry, according to the NT, was privately with his apostles at Caesarea Philippi. Mark reports that Jesus asked them, “Who do people say that I am?” (Mark 8.27 NRSV). They answered that people said Jesus was some great spiritual hero who had come back from the dead, possibly John the Baptist, or Elijah, or one of the prophets (v. 28). Then Jesus “asked them, ‘But who do you say that I am?’ Peter answered him, ‘You are the Messiah'” (v. 29).

Both Matthew and Luke report Jesus’ question and Peter’s answer a little differently. Matthew records that Jesus first asked, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” (Matt. 16.13). And Matthew records just like Mark does that Jesus asked the second time, “Who do you say that I am?” (v. 15). So, did Jesus mention “the Son of Man” in his first question, as Matthew reports, or not, as Mark and Luke record? It is a difficult question to answer. But I think the main point to be gleaned from Matthew’s account is that Jesus thereby indirectly identifies himself as “the Son of Man,” which he expressly did on several occasions according to all four New Testament (NT) gospels. (I do not subscribe to determinations of historical critics who have a weak view, or none at all, of the divine inspiration of the Bible and therefore allege that many of the NT gospel sayings of Jesus are historically inauthentic.)

Furthermore, Matthew records that Peter answered Jesus’ second question, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God” (Matt. 16.16), thus including the last phrase which Mark and Luke do not. What should we make of this difference? We should understand at least that for Mark and Luke, it does not add anything to Jesus’ identity as the Messiah to also include that he is the Son of God. This comes as shock to some Christians because they have been wrongly taught due to those axioms laid down by church fathers in their councils and creeds that there is a great deal of difference between Jesus being the Messiah of Israel and his being the Son of God. NO THERE IS NOT! Many scholars now say there is little or no difference, at least in certain NT gospel narratives. And one would be here in this comparison of the accounts of Jesus questioning his disciples about his identity and their answers.

Another example is when Jesus was tried before the Sanhedrin. After several false witnesses testified, the high priest Caiaphas finally said to Jesus, “tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God” (Matt. 26.63). Matthew records that Jesus began his answer by saying, “You have said so” (v. 64), whereas Mark reports that Jesus said, “I am” (Mark 14.62). I think most scholars agree that the Gospel of Matthew, being the most Jewish of the synoptics, relates Jesus actual answer and that it has to do with Moses law about witnesses. Regardless, both Matthew and Mark record alike what Jesus added, “But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven” (Matt. 26.64). Jesus surely alluded to Psalm 110.1 and Daniel 7.13-14, thus identifying himself as “Lord” and “Son of Man” in them.

The high priest then tore his clothes and said, “He has blasphemed?” Matt. 26.65), which is what he had symbolized by tearing his clothes. What had Jesus said that deserved the charge of blasphemy according to Torah? Nothing! It was not blasphemy according to Jewish belief, as some Christians have thought, for Jesus to have claimed to be the Messiah of Israel, even if he was not. There is no such law in Torah. For example, many Jewish men throughout the history of the Jewish people have claimed falsely to be that Messiah, yet Judaism never charged them with blasphemy and usually did not execute them for such a claim.

Did Caiaphas charge Jesus with blasphemy because he admitted to being the Son of God? That is what a large majority of Christians have thought throughout the Christian era because they have thought in claiming to be the Son of God, Jesus indirectly claimed to be God. NOT AT ALL! If Caiaphas and the other Sanhedrin members thought Jesus at any time claimed to be God, either directly or indirectly, they surely would have brought this out at their hearing and subsequent trial of Jesus rather than the lesser claim of being the Messiah. Rather, Matthew’s report that Caiaphas asked Jesus if he was “the Messiah, the Son of God” represents an interchanging of the two titles so that Caiaphas viewed them as synonymous. This is supported in Psalm 2.2-7, in which “anointed” (Heb. mashiach) means Messiah.

In fact, according to the Gospel of John, Jesus was twice accused of “making himself equal to God” and, later, “making yourself God” (John 5.18; 10.33). But both times he denied these charges in rather elaborate and extensive replies (John 5.19-47; 10.34-38). And these must have eventually, if not immediately, silenced his adversaries. This becomes most obvious when we realize that none of these allegations were brought forth at the Sanhedrin hearing and trial of Jesus.

Now, Jesus did not go around during his itinerant ministry claiming publicly to be Israel’s Messiah promised abundantly in its scriptures, which we Christians call “the Old Testament” (OT). The reason was he did not want to alert Roman officials in thinking he was a trouble maker who could stir up a messianic uprising. Thus, he only publicly affirmed his messiahship at the end.

But Jesus did go about identifying himself as “the Son of Man,” and he did it quite often. In doing so, he was alluding to Daniel 7.13-14, which I think is, besides the Shema, the most important OT text and upon which Jesus based his teaching about the kingdom of God. It reads, “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days [God the Father] and was presented before him. And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed” (ESV). So, Jesus is that Son of Man.

In conclusion, Jesus never said he was God; he even denied it when so charged twice; and he was not charged before the Sanhedrin of ever claiming to be God. But he did claim often to be that Son of Man in Dan 7.13-14 to whom God will give a great, everlasting kingdom in which his people from all ethnicities, nations, and languages will serve him forever. Since Daniel also says this kingdom will cover the entire earth (Daniel 2.35). And this status of Jesus as Son of Man ruling his worldwide kingdom on earth is a far greater status than that of his being the Messiah of Israel, no matter how blessed that is (Isa 49.6). Thus, we should listen to Jesus about who Jesus is and not be misled by church fathers who declared that he was God.

…………….

To see a list of titles of 130+ posts (2-3 pages) that are about Jesus not being God in the Bible, with a few about God not being a Trinity, at Kermit Zarley Blog click “Chistology” in the header bar. Most are condensations of my book, The Restitution of Jesus Christ. See my website servetustheevangelical.com, which is all about this book, with reviews, etc. Learn about my books and purchase them at kermitzarley.com. I was a Trinitarian for 22 years before reading myself out of it in the Bible.

Christology

Jesus

Jesus' Self Understanding

Messiah of Israel

Son of Man

the Son of God

Previous Post

August 2, 2016

Professor Wayne Grudem Endorses Donald Trump for U.S. President

Next Post

August 3, 2016 Does the Bible Err By Saying Philistines Predate Israelites in the Levant

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Angels Billy Graham Blog Description Book Reviews Christian Living Christianity Christology Church History Current Events Deity of Christ? Disarmament Eschatology Evangelicalism Ezekiel 38-39 Film Reviews God Golf Gospel Harmonization Health History Holy Spirit Incarnation? Interview Islam Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Jesus Last Empire Literary Announcements Major Championship Winners Masters Monotheism My Books New Testament Old Testament Politics Primitive Weapons Ryder Cup Science Society of Biblical Literature The Bible The Restitution of Jesus Christ Trinitarianism Trinity? Uncategorized Unconditional Love? War on Terrorism

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The feast of Purim commemorates the Jewish people's deliverance from Haman's plot.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author Books by Kermit Zarley Blog

See All Titles »