Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
About
Christology
Israel/Palestine
Publications
KermitZarley.com
Archives
Categories
- Angels
- Blog Description
- Book Reviews
- Christian Living
  - Unconditional Love?
- Christianity
- Christology
  - Deity of Christ?
  - Holy Spirit
  - Incarnation?
  - My Change
  - Trinity?
- Church History
- Current Events
- War on Terrorism
- Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
- Eschatology
- Ezekiel 38-39
- Last Empire
- Primitive Weapons
- Film Reviews
- God
- Golf
  - Billy Graham
  - Karsten Solheim
  - Lee Trevino
  - Major Championship Winners
  - Masters
  - Purpose
  - Ryder Cup
- Gospel Harmonization
- Interview
- Islam
- Jesus
- Literary Announcements
- Monotheism
- My Books
  - The Restitution of Jesus Christ
- Old Testament
- Politics
- Society of Biblical Literature
- The Bible
- Trinitarianism
- Uncategorized
FREE NEWSLETTER

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
What Does “the Real Jesus” Mean?

What Does “the Real Jesus” Mean?

Last updated on: November 23, 2018 at 12:04 pm by Kermit Zarley

What Does “the Real Jesus” Mean? 2018-11-23T12:04:35-07:00 Kermit Zarley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It depends on who you ask? And any answer should be compared with answers to the question, “what does ‘the historical Jesus’ mean?” These are prime questions among Jesus researchers in the academy–mostly historians and biblical scholars–who specialize in what is called “the quest for the historical Jesus.”

Most Christians are unaware of what goes on in the academy. The Quest for that Historical Jesus has been a premier investigation that is generally recognized among scholars to have begun during the late eighteenth century with the post-humous publication in 1774-1778 of a book by Hermann Samuel Reimarus, a German Lutheran pastor, entitled Fragments. German scholar and medical doctor Albert Schweitzer, in his famous book The Quest of the Historical Jesus (1906), brought Fragments much more to light by saying it was the beginning of a serious investigation of Jesus of Nazareth in which the unhistorical claims of the church about Jesus’ identity, such as his supposed divinity/deity, had been swept aside by an unbiased analysis of written sources. What was left for Reimarus, Schweitzer, and other scholars of their ilk came to be called “the historical Jesus.” In recent decades, Jesus researchers have questioned this terminology in describing their endeavor and searched for substitutes.

One expression proposed to identify Jesus, though little used by scholars, has been “the real Jesus.” The reason this subject has interested me is that soon after my book, The Restitution of Jesus Christ, was published, in 2008, I wrote a brief tract entitled “The Real Jesus” which represents a summary of this book.

Probably no scholar has wrestled with the expression “the real Jesus,” and thereby sought to define it, more than has Roman Catholic theologian John P. Meier. He is a priest, a professor of New Testament at Notre Dame, and general editor of the prestigious theological journal Catholic Biblical Quarterly.

John P. Meier is on the conservative side of Jesus researchers. So, he affirms Jesus’ virgin birth, divinity/deity, many of his NT miracles, and his resurrection from the dead. But Meier is also a historian, and as such he must also remain be more circumspect about these matters of faith and thus less biased about them as a historian. So, like many conservative Jesus researchers who call themselves “Christian,” Meier wears two hats: his religious hat and his historian hat.

Meier is known mostly for his mammoth study of Jesus in a book series entitled The Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Three volumes of this series are completed and published, and three more are planned.

But like Meier’s expression “marginal Jew” as he applies it to Jesus, I think his definition of “the real Jesus” suffers from ambiguity and perhaps a lack of common sense due to semantics. In Meier’s first volume in this series, he distinguishes between “the historical Jesus” and “the real Jesus.” But to get at these definitions, we need to have a basic understanding of their foundation.

“Historical Jesus” is an expression that Jesus researchers use for their discipline of using (presumably) scientific tools of modern historical research in an attempt to recover true information about Jesus. Thus, in appealing to the primary sources for investigation of the historical Jesus–which are the four NT gospels–at least historical-critical Jesus’ researchers begin their project by applying a set of criterion to these gospels in order to decide what material is historically authentic/reliable. This criterion includes multiple attestation, dissimilarity, embarrassment, discontinuity, and coherence.

Thus, when Jesus’ gospel sayings and deeds do not exhibit some of these criterion characteristics, these scholars dismiss such texts as non-historical, often alleging they are fictional creations of the later church. So, their “historical Jesus” is based on those NT texts and others (e.g., non-canonical Gospel of Thomas) that they regard as historically reliable.

The resulting portrait is a bare-bones Jesus. Thus, many of these scholars would say Jesus was a prophet, a sage, and an exorcist, and perhaps he worked medical cures; but he certainly was not God and didn’t, or probably didn’t, claim to be the Son of Man, the Son of God, or the Messiah of Israel.

So, how does John P. Meier define “the real Jesus”? In Volume 1 of his series, The Roots of the Problem and Person (1991), Meier begins (p. 21), “The historical Jesus is not the real Jesus. The real Jesus is not the historical Jesus.” He asks, “What do we mean when we say we want to investigate the ‘real’ Jesus”? Meier then defines any real human, thus the real Jesus, as “the total reality of that person, everything he or she ever thought, felt, experienced, did, and said.” I think this definition of the “real Jesus” is way too restrictive and that most people would reject it. Meier then offers a lesser gradation of “real” for public figures, saying written sources and others can provide “a ‘reasonably complete’ picture” of that person.

Nevertheless, Meier concludes (p. 22) concerning the NT gospels, “yet the vast majority of these deeds and words, the ‘reasonably complete’ record of the ‘real’ Jesus, is irrevocably lost to us today. . . . The reader who wants to know the real Jesus should close this book right now, because the historical Jesus is neither the real Jesus nor the easy way to him. The real Jesus is not available and never will be. This is true not because Jesus did not exist–he certainly did–but rather because the sources that have survived do not and never intended to record all or even most of the words and deeds of his public ministry–to say nothing of the rest of his life.” “Rest of his life”! That would include his life in heaven. How are humans going to know about that except that he sits with God on his throne.

WOW! I think most people would deem these Meier statements as semantical hairsplitting that overturns language as commonly used. Meier means no one, not even myself, can know “the real Kermit Zarley” because all of my words and deeds are not recorded and therefore not accessible for historical investigation. I think that’s ridiculous because it’s so impractical. When I think of my friend John and knowing who the “real John” is, I don’t need to know everything the guy has ever did or said throughout his entire life to know who the real John is, that is, to know who John really is.

When I titled my tract “The Real Jesus,” I meant the Jesus who can be clearly identified in the NT gospels as opposed to misunderstandings of these gospels which have resulted in historically incorrect identifications of Jesus. But in using the word “historically,” I am not using it as historical-critical Jesus researchers do. Rather, I am using it as nearly all people do–that to say something, or an act, or saying is or was historical is to say it actually happened. Some would call this “the real Jesus” or “the actual Jesus,” which I accept.

Actually, the whole Quest for the Historical Jesus enterprise began as Paul Rhodes Eddy and James K. Beilby explain (The Historical Jesus: Five Views, 33), “contemporary Christianity must not devolve into a new form of docetism.” The NT contains several statements opposing incipient docetism–the belief that Jesus of Nazareth existed, but he was God and only seemed (Gr. dokeo) to possess a physical body. So, he actually was only a phantom or spirit, so that his alleged sufferings were only apparent, thus not real.

To say we cannot recover a reasonably accurate and complete portrait of the “real Jesus” as he existed during his public ministry, especially when compared to that of most any other famous man known publicly, sounds too much like Rudolf Bultmann’s statement (Jesus and the Word, 9), “We can, strictly speaking, know almost nothing about the life and personality of Jesus since the early Christian sources show no interest in either.”

…………….

To see a list of titles of 130+ posts (2-3 pages) that are about Jesus not being God in the Bible, with a few about God not being a Trinity, at Kermit Zarley Blog click “Chistology” in the header bar. Most are condensations of my book, The Restitution of Jesus Christ. See my website servetustheevangelical.com, which is all about this book, with reviews, etc. Learn about my books and purchase them at kermitzarley.com. I was a Trinitarian for 22 years before reading myself out of it in the Bible.

Christology

Jesus

John P. Meier

Quest for the Historical Jesus

Real Jesus

Previous Post

July 17, 2016

Stenson Wins 2016 British Open in Style

Next Post

July 26, 2016 Is human Enhancement Morally Acceptable?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Angels Billy Graham Blog Description Book Reviews Christian Living Christianity Christology Church History Current Events Deity of Christ? Disarmament Eschatology Evangelicalism Ezekiel 38-39 Film Reviews God Golf Gospel Harmonization Health History Holy Spirit Incarnation? Interview Islam Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Jesus Last Empire Literary Announcements Major Championship Winners Masters Monotheism My Books New Testament Old Testament Politics Primitive Weapons Ryder Cup Science Society of Biblical Literature The Bible The Restitution of Jesus Christ Trinitarianism Trinity? Uncategorized Unconditional Love? War on Terrorism

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God command Job to do after his friends were rebuked?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Offer more sacrifices Pray for his friends Go to Uz Fast for 40 days

Books by This Author Books by Kermit Zarley Blog

See All Titles »