Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

kermitzarleyblog

Ben Witherington Entangles Himself by Deifying Jesus

Last updated on: November 23, 2018 at 12:04 pm   by Kermit Zarley

Ben Witherington Entangles Himself by Deifying Jesus 2018-11-23T12:04:04-07:00 Kermit Zarley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ben Witherington III is a distinguished New Testament (NT) professor at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is also a friend of mine who I highly respect as a theologian. I usually visit briefly with Ben every year at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature. I agree a lot theologically with Ben except for his identifying Jesus as God.

I once told Ben that I had been a Trinitarian for twenty-two years, then re-examined in depth the subject of whether or not Jesus is identified as God in the Bible, changed my mind about it, and wrote a 600-page book on it entitled The Restitution of Jesus of Christ (2008). He replied, “You’ll never convince me.” So, he had no interest in seeing my book. But that didn’t harm my positive feelings for Ben Witherington, from whom I have learned by reading some of his books.

Today, I watched a video of Methodist Ben Witherington delivering a one-hour message entitled “The Self-Understanding of Jesus” at Meyer’s Park Methodist Church in Oakland, California. Yet Ben introduced his subject as “a singular Jesus in a pluralistic world.”

Actually, the only time in this message when Ben addressed Jesus’ self-understanding was (1) Jesus’ constant self-identification as “the Son of Man” in his sayings in the four NT gospels, in which I think Ben correctly claims that Jesus’ alluded to Daniel 7.13-14 as that “one like a son of man” being himself, and (2) Jesus’ answer to the High Priest Caiaphas’ question, “Are you the Messiah, the son of the Blessed One” (Mark 14.61 NRSV), referring to him whom Jesus often called “Father.” Jesus answered positively, though a little obscurely when you compare the answer recorded by all three synoptics. Then Jesus added, “‘you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power,’ and ‘coming with the clouds of heaven’” (v. 62). Perhaps most NT professors agree that Jesus here alluded to both Psalm 110.1 and Daniel 7.13 as indicated in the NRSV by the single quotes.

Dr. Witherington made the interesting observation that the only place in the entire Jewish Bible (=Old Testament=OT) where the Son of man concept and the kingdom of God are mentioned together is in Daniel 7.13-14, thereby affirming that Jesus derived his identity as Son of Man and his concept of the kingdom of God, which was the centerpiece of his parabolic teaching during his two-to-three-year itinerant ministry, from Daniel 7.13-14. Indeed, excepting the Shema in Deuteronomy 6.4-6, I regard this Danielic text as the most important in the OT.

But in Ben’s message, he begins with Daniel 7.13-14 and then moves to other biblical texts as support for his identifying Jesus as being God. Interestingly, Ben rightly states that Jesus never expressly identified himself as God, such as “I am God,” in any of his NT gospel sayings. And Ben never says Jesus understood himself as being God. (Both Jimmy Dunn and Tom Wright say Jesus did not believe he was God.) Yet Ben endeavors to prove from scripture that Jesus is indeed God while ignoring whether or not Jesus understood himself as God, which the title of his message would lead one to believe that Ben was going to address, which he does not.

First, Ben says Daniel 7.14 (indirectly) identifies Jesus as God because we read of this Son of Man, who is Jesus, “men of every language worshiped him.” That is how the NIV renders this phrase in Daniel 7.14, but most other major English Bibles don’t; they have “serve him” (e.g., KJV, NASB, NRSV, ESV). It’s the same concerning the Son of Man in v. 27. That is, the NIV has “worship and obey him,” whereas the other versions just cited have “serve and obey him.”

The Aramaic word translated in Dan 7.14 and v. 27 as “worship” in the NIV and “serve” in these other English versions is pelach. Any Bible lexicon or Aramaic dictionary reveals that this word can be rendered “serve,” “worship,” “revere,” or “minister.” And it is not necessarily used exclusively for such an act being directed toward a deity. So, I think Dr. Witherington was not being scholarly when he failed to point out these possible meanings of pelach in Daniel 7.

Moreover, from the perspective of the Shema, the Ancient of Days in Daniel 7 refers to the one and only true God, so that the Son of Man therein cannot also be God. To say so would make these individuals two Gods–an abhorrence to Judaism and a charge from which post-apostolic, institutional Christianity has never escaped.

Second, Ben then cites the Devil’s temptation of Jesus to turn stones into bread, recorded in Matt. 4.3 and Luke 4.3. Ben says the Devil would not have so tempted Jesus unless he was God because only God could do such a miracle. WOW! I must say, Ben, I was shocked by this from a scholar of your stature. Many Christians throughout the ages have thought Jesus was and is God because he did miracles, and many have thought likewise since Jesus arose from the dead. But so many biblical scholars of many various stripes have alleged that this kind of thinking is so short sighted. Prophets and Jesus’ apostles did miracles, and all of God’s people will arise from the dead to receive immortal bodies at the resurrection at the end of the age, and none of these things prove that any of these people are God. I’m going to give Ben a break on this one and just assume that he made a verbal slip which he would rectify if brought to his attention.

Third, Ben says Jesus ushering in at the end of the age (at his second coming) the eschatological kingdom that will be eternal, and his reign over it eternal, requires that Jesus is God. I fail to see the logic, here, and Ben doesn’t offer any or scripture to support this assertion.

Fourth, Ben does as so many Trinitarians do by citing 1 Tim 2.5 as evidence that Jesus is God and man, and Ben adds that it indicates Jesus is a “God-man.” This text says in the NRSV, “For there is one God; there is also one mediator between God and humankind, Christ Jesus, himself human, who gave himself a ransom for all.” This text certainly does not say Jesus is a God-man, which the Bible never says anywhere. And Ben so asserts arbitrarily, thus without citing any scripture or making any logical arguments to support it. At least Ben is right on target in saying Jesus fully REVEALS or manifests God, which does not mean he IS God.

I think Paul states this in 1 Tim 2.5–which scholars say may be a creedal statement already in existence and thus not created by Paul—because of Jesus’ uniqueness as a human being and therefore not that he is God and man. What made Jesus so unique? It was that he was sinless and thus qualified to bear our sins on the cross as the Lamb of God without spot and blemish. Furthermore, Jesus’ status as “the Son of God,” thus not just any son of God—for there have been many, including humans, angels, and Israel according to the Bible—adds to Jesus’ uniqueness. But neither does this status as the Son of God mean Jesus is God, as is so commonly thought. Rather, it indicates Jesus had such an extraordinary relationship with God. That is why the message came from above at Jesus’ baptism and Transfiguration, saying, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased.”

When I read the title of this message-video by Ben Witherington III, “The Self-Understanding of Jesus,” I was really wanting to hear and see it. But I must say I was a little disappointed, since Ben hardly addressed this subject. Yet this subject has been at the core of “the quest for the historical Jesus” undertaken by scholars throughout the past 200+ years. Instead, I think Ben hopelessly entangles himself in this message in his effort to prove from scripture that Jesus is God, and I think many, if not most, leading scholars involved in the quest would agree with this assertion.

Having said this, I need to admit that some of these scholars, who have a very weak view of the inspiration of scripture (=Bible) would say we can’t know anything or hardly anything about the self-understanding of Jesus, with which Ben and I together wholeheartedly disagree.

…………….

To see a list of titles of 130+ posts (2-3 pages) that are about Jesus not being God in the Bible, with a few about God not being a Trinity, at Kermit Zarley Blog click “Chistology” in the header bar. Most are condensations of my book, The Restitution of Jesus Christ. See my website servetustheevangelical.com, which is all about this book,  with reviews, etc. Learn about my books and purchase them at kermitzarley.com. I was a Trinitarian for 22 years before reading myself out of it in the Bible.

 

Christology

Jesus

Ben Witherington III

Jesus as Son of God

Jesus as Son of Man

Previous Post



July 29, 2016

U.S. State Department's Propaganda Against Jihadists

Next Post



August 1, 2016 Jimmy Walker Wins His First Major Golf Championship


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Angels Billy Graham Blog Description Book Reviews Christian Living Christianity Christology Church History Current Events Deity of Christ? Disarmament Eschatology Evangelicalism Ezekiel 38-39 Film Reviews God Golf Gospel Harmonization Health History Holy Spirit Incarnation? Interview Islam Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Jesus Last Empire Literary Announcements Major Championship Winners Masters Monotheism My Books New Testament Old Testament Politics Primitive Weapons Ryder Cup Science Society of Biblical Literature The Bible The Restitution of Jesus Christ Trinitarianism Trinity? Uncategorized Unconditional Love? War on Terrorism

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the first piece of the Armor of God mentioned in Ephesians 6?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Belt of Truth The Sword of the Spirit The Helmet of Salvation The Shield of Faith

Books by This Author Books by Kermit Zarley Blog

See All Titles »

Related posts from Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

The Nicene Creed's Birthplace Is Found Buried in...

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Stephen Hawking Said "Losers" Boast about IQ—That's Trump

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Trump Should Retake his Old Name Drumpf that...

Kermit Zarley Blog

Family

Counting the Cost Before Going to War

Kermit Zarley Blog

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

Looking For Good Catholic Writing - October 2026

He alone extends the heavens, and he walks upon the waves of...

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube