Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Seasons of Grace

Home
Catholic
Secretly Filming Animal Abuse Is Okay, Court Rules; But Not Infant Abuse?

Secretly Filming Animal Abuse Is Okay, Court Rules; But Not Infant Abuse?

Last updated on: August 5, 2015 at 3:35 pm by Kathy Schiffer

Secretly Filming Animal Abuse Is Okay, Court Rules; But Not Infant Abuse? 2015-08-05T15:35:02-05:00 Kathy Schiffer

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Apparently, it’s okay to secretly film abuse of cattle, chickens and other animals at agricultural facilities.

But apparently, it’s NOT okay to secretly film abuse of unborn fetuses in Planned Parenthood clinics and research centers.

And I’m trying to understand exactly WHY.

* * * * *

Image courtesy of Pixabay

In Boise, U.S. District Court Judge B. Lynn Winmill ruled on Monday, August 3, that the First Amendment protects animal rights activists who secretly filmed abuse as part of an undercover investigation at farms and slaughterhouses.

The ruling overturns Idaho’s so-called “ag gag” law, which bans secretly filming inside industrial agricultural operations without the owner’s permission. The law was passed in 2012, after the animal welfare group Mercy For Animals released undercover videos of workers at Bettencourt Dairies’ Dry Creek Dairy in Hansen, Idaho, punching and jumping on cows.

According to KTVB.com:

A coalition of animal activists, civil rights groups and media organizations sued the state more than a year ago, opposing the so called “ag gag” law. The coalition said the law curtailed freedom of speech and made gathering proof of animal abuse a crime with a harsher punishment than the penalty for animal cruelty.

…Idaho lawmakers approved the law in 2014 after the state’s $2.5 billion dairy industry complained that videos of cows being abused at a southern Idaho dairy filmed in 2012 unfairly hurt their business.

Animal rights groups have cheered the court’s decision. The judge’s ruling may ultimately invalidate similar legislation which protects farmers and agricultural facilities in Montana, Utah, North Dakota, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa and North Carolina from greater scrutiny.

* * * * *

Image; Pixabay

And that brings me to the story that’s all over the news this week: the temporary restraining order issued by U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco, prohibiting the Center for Medical Progress from releasing recordings, names, addresses or dates gathered at meetings with officials of the National Abortion Federation and its members.

Orrick’s ruling was a response to the NAF’s claims that they would suffer “harrassment, intimidation and even violence” if the Center for Medical Progress was permitted to circulate the incriminating videos. Judge Orrick has now extended the temporary restraining order to August 27; at the end of the month, a hearing will determine whether the CMP should be permanently barred from releasing the videos.

* * * * *

Okay, is your irony meter beeping yet?

Set aside the revelation by The Federalist and other sources that Judge Orrick is married to a pro-abortion activist, Caroline “Linie” Farrow Orrick, who has reportedly expressed support even for infanticide. One might wonder why Judge Orrick did not recuse himself from this case; but let’s move on.

And set aside, if you will, the fact that the judge’s restraining order apparently applies only to video and audio captured by CMP with NAF officials, presumably at a meeting where their investigators posed as tissue brokers. That’s an easy work-around for the CMP, which can easily edit the remaining videos to delete scenes directly quoting NAF officials, but it doesn’t provide the protection the judge might have wanted to impose on behalf of Planned Parenthood.

Here’s my question: How can these two judicial rulings exist on the same planet?

If you–like me–are having a hard time reconciling these two decisions, don’t you kinda hope that both the San Francisco and the Boise District Court decisions will end up at the Supreme Court on the same day?

Abortion

Justice

Animal Activists

Center for Medical Progress

National Abortion Federation

Previous Post

August 5, 2015

WYD Registration Just Opened--and 45,000 Already Signed Up

Next Post

August 5, 2015 Conceiving a Child Via First-Class Mail? That Doesn't Sound Like Fun!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #Synod14 Abortion Abstinence Abuse Addiction Adoption Advent Adventure Advertising Aging Agnosticism All Saints Day All Souls Day Amish Anathema Angels Anglican Animals Annulment Annunciation Apocalypse Apologetics Apostles Apostleship of the Sea Apparitions Archangels Archbishop Cordileone Archbishop Dolan Archbishop Vigneron Archeology Architecture Art Art Buchwald Ash Wednesday Assisted Suicide Astronauts Atheism Athletes Babies Baptism Beatification Beauty Bible Biochemistry Bioethics Birds Bishop Lori Bishops Blasphemy Books Canon Law Canonization Capital Punishment Cardinal Burke Cardinal Dolan Cardinal George Caritas Catechesis Catechism of the Catholic Church Catholic Catholic Education Catholic Higher Education Catholic Social Teaching Celibacy Cemeteries Character Charity Chastity Cheapskate Christian Unity Christmas Churches Civil Rights Cloning Comedy Communion of Saints Community Kitchens Confession Confirmation Conscience Consequences Consistory Constitution Contraception Conversion Cooking Councils of the Church Creativity Criminal Justice Cristero War Crucifixion Crystal Cathedral Culture Death Death and Dying Death Penalty Department of Health and Human Services Diaconate Dictatorship of Relativism Dignity Disability Discrimination Dissidence Divorce Doctors of the Church Early Church Fathers Easter Economics Ecumenism Education Encyclicals Environmentalism Episcopal Church Eucharist Euthanasia Evangelism Evangelists Evangelization Evolution Excuses Facebook Faith Families Family Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Federal Government Feminism Fiction Film First Amendment First Communion For Greater Glory Forgiveness Free Speech Friends Friendship Gender Discrimination Germany Gnosticism Good Friday Government Grace Greed Gregorian Calendar Happiness Health Heaven Heresy History Holidays Holiness Hollywood Holy Land Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Holy Week Holy Year Home Sweet Home Homosexuality Hope Humanism Humility Humor Imagination Immaculate Conception Immigration Impulsivity In Vitro Fertilization Incarnation Indulgences Infallibility Internet Islam Italy Jerusalem Jesus Judaism Justice Kathleen Sebelius Labor Movement LCWR Lent Life Literature Liturgy Lourdes Love Magi Marketing Marriage Martyrdom Martyrs Mary Mass Media Medical Ethics Mexico Michigan Miracles Missionaries Modernism Modesty Monks Monothelitism Motherhood Movies Mushrooms Music Muslim Mystery Mysticism Mythology Nativity Natural Law Nature New Evangelization New Media New Year New Year's Resolutions Nostalgia Obscenity Occult Old Testament Origen Orthodox Orvieto Pallium Papacy Parenting Patience Patriarch Bartholomew Patriotism Peace Peace and Justice Penitence Pentecost People Persecution Philosophy Poetry Political activism Political Correctness Politics Polls Pop Culture Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope John XXIII Pope Paul VI Pope St. Pius X Pope Urban VII Population Prayer Preaching Prejudice Pride Priesthood Pro-Life Protestantism Psychology Purgatory Queenship of Mary Racism Rape Real Presence Reconciliation Reformation Relics Religious Religious Liberty Reliquary Renewal Reproductive Technology Resurrection Rights Romance Rome Royalty Sacraments Sacred Heart Saints Satanism Science Science Fiction Scripture Seal of Confession Secularism Seniors September 11 Seventy Times Seven Sexuality Sharks Sin Smoking Social Communications Social Justice Social Networking Social Sciences Space Exploration Spirituality Sports St. Luke St. Patrick's Day St. Paul St. Peter St. Teresa of Avila Stations of the Cross Steve Jobs Superstition Supreme Court Symbolism Synod Technology Teen Rebellion Television Terrorism Thankfulness Thanksgiving Theology Think This, Not That Tobit Toilets Toys Tradition Traditions Transplants Travel Trinity Twitter U.S. Air Force Uncategorized United Nations USCCB Valentine Vatican Vatican Archives Vatican Blogfest Virtue Vocations Where We Pray White Heart Women World Day of Social Communications World Meeting of Families World News World Youth Day Worship Writing Year of Consecrated Life Year of Faith Year of Mercy Youth

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many stringed instruments were used in the Temple?

Select your answer to see how you score.

10 5 7 3