When There’s a Mix-up in the Store and You Buy the Wrong Baby

Last updated on: April 4, 2015 at 11:57 am by Kathy Schiffer

When There’s a Mix-up in the Store and You Buy the Wrong Baby 2015-04-04T11:57:38-05:00 Kathy Schiffer

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In Vitro Fertilization (Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)

What if you go to buy a baby and there’s a some kind of parentage mix-up, or the seller lies to you about whose child this really is?

That’s just one of the avoidable crises that are spawned by a culture in which human life is a commodity, to be bought and sold, brought into existence or extinguished at will.

Wesley Smith, special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture, has a truly disheartening article over on LifeNews.com about a lesbian couple in Canada who bought sperm for artificial insemination, then later discovered that the father was not who they thought he was. Not a brilliant scientist, as they’d been told, but a schizophrenic criminal–with a mole! Oh horrors!

Smith quotes an article about the ensuing lawsuit from the Atlanta Journal:

Collins and Hanson, according to the suit, were told that their then-anonymous donor had an IQ of 160, a bachelor of science degree in neuroscience and a master’s degree in artificial intelligence, and that he was working on his PhD in neuroscience engineering. He also was described as an eloquent speaker, mature beyond his years, and healthy.

Collins, via intra-uterine insemination, gave birth to a son on July 19, 2007…

The couple and other families who had used him as a donor quickly discovered through their own research that he is, according to the suit, schizophrenic, had dropped out of college and had been arrested for burglary, and that his pictures had been doctored to remove a large mole from his cheek.

The Atlanta Journal reports:

According to the suit, if Collins and Hanson had known their donor’s history earlier, they would not have purchased his sperm from Xytex.

Nancy Hersh, a lawyer for the couple, said they love their son but want to make sure he can be properly cared for if he is diagnosed as having schizophrenia.

Collins and Hanson say in the suit that they have suffered emotional and financial damages and they now will have to spend more money to evaluate and care for their son to make certain that he receives any medical treatment and care he may require in the future. They are suing for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of warranty, battery and unfair business practices.

The lesbian mamas insist that they love their son–but they worry that they will need to spend more for testing and to make certain he receives proper care (if, in fact, he inherits his father’s schizophrenia).

But misrepresentation on the part of a sperm bank is only the tip of the iceberg with the new reproductive technologies. There’s the problem of masturbation–a sin in the eyes of the Church, since it separates the sexual act from its natural procreative and unitive purposes. There’s the matter of feticide, the intentional destruction of hundreds of unwanted children conceived in a petri dish. There’s the separation of procreation from the sexual act between a husband and wife, and the usurpation by science of the role of God in creation of new human beings. And just think of the emotional crisis for a child who learns that his parents have filed a “wrongful birth” lawsuit!

Boston attorney Ben Seisler sued Fairfax Cryobank in Virginia, after learning that sperm he’d donated had been widely distributed and he’d fathered at least 70 children. “They’re not my kids,” he said. “I don’t see them as my kids.” Well, that’s nice, Mr. Seisler, but they ARE your kids–and with so many offspring populating the gene pool in Virginia, there is a risk that those children will meet one another, fall in love and marry, and face a future in which their children will have increased risk of genetic mutations.

And in 2013, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that sperm donors are legal fathers–opening the door to litigation regarding visitation rights (as in this case in New Jersey), child support (as in this Kansas ruling), and other thorny issues. Children of sperm donors have increasingly sought information about their natural parent, in order to learn more about potentially troubling genetic conditions.

Rev. Tadeusz Pacholczyk, Ph.D., director of education at the National Catholic Bioethics Center, says of sperm donation:

These practices point to a fundamental problem in the way we understand the gift of our human bodies. Our sex cells, or gametes, are special cells. They uniquely identify us. They are an intimate expression of our own bodily identity, and mark our human fruitfulness. Hence our own gametes exist in a discernible relationship to marriage. Each of us, in fact, has been given a capacity, a radical capacity, for total self-donation to a unique member of the opposite sex in marriage. Our gametes, and their exclusive availability to our spouse through marital acts, are an important sign of this radical capacity for self-donation. They uniquely denote who we are, and manifest the beautiful and life-engendering possibility of giving ourselves away to the one person whom we singularly love as our husband or wife. Hence, donating to sperm or egg banks violates something fundamental at the core of our own humanity. It dissociates us from the deeper meaning of our own bodies and gravely damages the inner order of marriage.

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, while serving as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, wrote in Donum Vitae (On the Gift of Life):

Recourse to the gametes of a third person, in order to have sperm or ovum available, constitutes a violation of the reciprocal commitment of the spouses and a grave lack in regard to that essential property of marriage which is its unity…. Masturbation, through which the sperm is normally obtained, is another sign of this dissociation: even when it is done for the purpose of procreation, the act remains deprived of its unitive meaning: “It lacks the sexual relationship called for by the moral order…”

Wesley Smith wraps it up with a reiteration of the famed quote by Sir Walter Scott, from his classic Marmion:

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when choosing to eugenically conceive.

Bioethics

Family

Previous Post

April 3, 2015

Archbishop Chaput Among Signatories on New Joint Statement on Religious Liberty

Next Post

April 4, 2015 With Weeping and Lamentations: Christ Entombed

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #Synod14 Abortion Abstinence Abuse Addiction Adoption Advent Adventure Advertising Aging Agnosticism All Saints Day All Souls Day Amish Anathema Angels Anglican Animals Annulment Annunciation Apocalypse Apologetics Apostles Apostleship of the Sea Apparitions Archangels Archbishop Cordileone Archbishop Dolan Archbishop Vigneron Archeology Architecture Art Art Buchwald Ash Wednesday Assisted Suicide Astronauts Atheism Athletes Babies Baptism Beatification Beauty Bible Biochemistry Bioethics Birds Bishop Lori Bishops Blasphemy Books Canon Law Canonization Capital Punishment Cardinal Burke Cardinal Dolan Cardinal George Caritas Catechesis Catechism of the Catholic Church Catholic Catholic Education Catholic Higher Education Catholic Social Teaching Celibacy Cemeteries Character Charity Chastity Cheapskate Christian Unity Christmas Churches Civil Rights Cloning Comedy Communion of Saints Community Kitchens Confession Confirmation Conscience Consequences Consistory Constitution Contraception Conversion Cooking Councils of the Church Creativity Criminal Justice Cristero War Crucifixion Crystal Cathedral Culture Death Death and Dying Death Penalty Department of Health and Human Services Diaconate Dictatorship of Relativism Dignity Disability Discrimination Dissidence Divorce Doctors of the Church Early Church Fathers Easter Economics Ecumenism Education Encyclicals Environmentalism Episcopal Church Eucharist Euthanasia Evangelism Evangelists Evangelization Evolution Excuses Facebook Faith Families Family Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Federal Government Feminism Fiction Film First Amendment First Communion For Greater Glory Forgiveness Free Speech Friends Friendship Gender Discrimination Germany Gnosticism Good Friday Government Grace Greed Gregorian Calendar Happiness Health Heaven Heresy History Holidays Holiness Hollywood Holy Land Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Holy Week Holy Year Home Sweet Home Homosexuality Hope Humanism Humility Humor Imagination Immaculate Conception Immigration Impulsivity In Vitro Fertilization Incarnation Indulgences Infallibility Internet Islam Italy Jerusalem Jesus Judaism Justice Kathleen Sebelius Labor Movement LCWR Lent Life Literature Liturgy Lourdes Love Magi Marketing Marriage Martyrdom Martyrs Mary Mass Media Medical Ethics Mexico Michigan Miracles Missionaries Modernism Modesty Monks Monothelitism Motherhood Movies Mushrooms Music Muslim Mystery Mysticism Mythology Nativity Natural Law Nature New Evangelization New Media New Year New Year's Resolutions Nostalgia Obscenity Occult Old Testament Origen Orthodox Orvieto Pallium Papacy Parenting Patience Patriarch Bartholomew Patriotism Peace Peace and Justice Penitence Pentecost People Persecution Philosophy Poetry Political activism Political Correctness Politics Polls Pop Culture Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope John XXIII Pope Paul VI Pope St. Pius X Pope Urban VII Population Prayer Preaching Prejudice Pride Priesthood Pro-Life Protestantism Psychology Purgatory Queenship of Mary Racism Rape Real Presence Reconciliation Reformation Relics Religious Religious Liberty Reliquary Renewal Reproductive Technology Resurrection Rights Romance Rome Royalty Sacraments Sacred Heart Saints Satanism Science Science Fiction Scripture Seal of Confession Secularism Seniors September 11 Seventy Times Seven Sexuality Sharks Sin Smoking Social Communications Social Justice Social Networking Social Sciences Space Exploration Spirituality Sports St. Luke St. Patrick's Day St. Paul St. Peter St. Teresa of Avila Stations of the Cross Steve Jobs Superstition Supreme Court Symbolism Synod Technology Teen Rebellion Television Terrorism Thankfulness Thanksgiving Theology Think This, Not That Tobit Toilets Toys Tradition Traditions Transplants Travel Trinity Twitter U.S. Air Force Uncategorized United Nations USCCB Valentine Vatican Vatican Archives Vatican Blogfest Virtue Vocations Where We Pray White Heart Women World Day of Social Communications World Meeting of Families World News World Youth Day Worship Writing Year of Consecrated Life Year of Faith Year of Mercy Youth

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Elijah's successor, receiving a double portion of his spirit?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micaiah Samuel Elisha Obadiah