Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Seasons of Grace

Home
Catholic
Atheist’s “Modern Christmas Carol” Is an Indictment of Social Media

Atheist’s “Modern Christmas Carol” Is an Indictment of Social Media

Last updated on: December 22, 2014 at 9:11 am by Kathy Schiffer

Atheist’s “Modern Christmas Carol” Is an Indictment of Social Media 2014-12-22T09:11:29-05:00 Kathy Schiffer

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bob Seidensticker, who writes at the Atheist Portal at Patheos, is a sparring partner and a friend. Our paths don’t cross on a daily basis; but when I write to counter some aspect of atheist thought, Bob is sure to pop in at my combox or on Facebook and tell me why I’m wrong. He is always polite, and he helps to clarify why I’m actually quite right.

Somehow, Bob has never appreciated the logic of a worldview that presupposes the existence of a Creator.

And I, for my part, have not enough faith in serendipity and happenstance to believe that tree frogs and salamanders and pupillary light reflex just popped into existence on their own, without the initiation of a divine Being who holds the earth in balance. I think of this humorous argument for special creation:

Anyway, Bob invited me to read and review his book A Modern Christmas Carol–I think in the unfounded hope that I might give it a positive review and, better still, see the folly of my [Christian] ways and burst onto the Atheist Portal.

Spoiler alert: That didn’t happen!

* * * * *

A Modern Christmas Carol is a short retelling of Dickens’ classic that examines the fictional life of Nathan Thorpe, a Christian televangelist.

As readers, we are invited to walk with Thorpe as he moves from a shallow, half-hearted existence to a more fulfilled life marked by caring and honesty that had previously been absent in this life.

Along the way, assisted by the vision of his former business partner and three ghosts, Thorpe undergoes a radical transformation of character as he moves from a Christian faith to Agnosticism at the brink of Atheism. In what must surprise absolutely no one who is familiar with Seidensticker’s background, Thorpe’s conversion of heart and mind coincides with his movement away from traditional Christianity.

Whether Seidensticker’s work achieves its purpose is debatable.

As literature, this story is not likely to garner any awards. With lines like “In the potluck of life, she was the angel food cake amid the jello salads”, Seidensticker surely wasn’t expecting adulation for his storytelling.
As a meaningful examination of life philosophies through development of his story’s characters, this tome also fails. There is nothing profound about anyone who appears on the pages of this little book.
Actually, it is difficult to believe that “A Modern Christmas Carol” could even succeed as an apology for atheism, as hard as it tries. The premise of Thorpe’s conversion from Christianity might carry some weight if Thorpe had ever been a Christian in the first place.

This book is filled with caricatures and clichés, and seems totally incapable of seeing the forest (Christianity) for the trees (including, but not limited to, theodicy–the study of the problem of evil).

In fact, before Thorpe can make the jump from page 1 to page 2, he has already been exposed as materialistic, uncaring, and alienated from his wife. And it goes downhill from there. We also learn that Thorpe is manipulative, self-absorbed, cynical, unfaithful, power-hungry and hypocritical. And those are his better qualities! It’s no wonder no one wants to be a Christian!

As Seidensticker’s story progresses, we are treated to other insights that help us to “realize” the strengths of Atheism in the face of Christianity’s weaknesses. Terrible injustices (e.g., 20 million slaves who are mistreated, crippled and repeatedly raped) are laid at the feet of organized religion; and the incompatibility of faith and reason is a common theme. People of intelligence, don’t ya know, are attracted by evidence, not by faith.

Perhaps Seidensticker hasn’t yet had an opportunity to read St. John Paul II’s “Fides et Ratio.” Perhaps he hasn’t had an opportunity to converse with the majority of scientists who believe in a personal God or in a higher power. Perhaps he is unaware of the scientific accomplishments of believers such as Monseigneur Georges Lemaître, who proposed what became known as the Big Bang Theory.

Perhaps it would surprise Seidensticker to learn that among many Christians, there is no conflict between science and faith, either in the Bible or anywhere else in their religion.

Seidensticker is more interested in promoting an atheistic moral relativism as the solution to all the world’s problems. Go figure.

* * * * *

So you get the idea: I didn’t love the book or accept its premise.

But let’s stop for a minute to consider WHY Bob Seidensticker thinks so poorly of Christians that he could imagine an unsavory character like Reverend Thorpe.

See, I think part of the problem is that Bob’s experience with Christians has exposed him to people who, if not as corrupt as Thorpe, are deeply flawed and who fail to demonstrate the love of Christ in their interactions with him. As I said, he has commented on my blog, and his views–while contrary to mine–have always been expressed with courtesy. But while some readers are willing to engage Bob in the realm of ideas, his carefully stated ideas draw fire from abrasive readers who say things like this:

“Thanks for this steaming nugget of regurgitated, pseudo-intellectual blather, you Hitchens-Dawkins parroting, basement dwelling, faux-analytical, GNU-Reddit obsessed asshat.”

Or this:

“In a fit of solipsistic butthurt, you blocked me from your blog several months ago, thereby fulfilling the true ‘spirit ‘ of your worldview.”

NOW I ASK YOU: Is this the kind of retort that’s going to score points and win hearts and minds to Christ?

Because you know, that’s what we’re all called to do. Not to hurl the sharpest knives in an on-line argument, but to mirror Christ’s love, to propose the idea of faith and to make it seem attractive by our own compassion and thoughtfulness and strong character. By being truly “Christian” in our interactions with others in the world, we can be the magnet that draws others to seek, as the apostle Paul writes, the reason for the joy that is within us.

Why does Bob Seidensticker–and why do others on the Atheist Portal and out there in the greater society–fail to understand the Faith that’s been handed down to us from the Apostles?

Perhaps they’ve been so long exposed to the same tired arguments (an angry God, the problem of evil, etc.) that they are unable to consider other viewpoints.
Perhaps they’ve never heard the positive message of the Gospel expressed in a way that can break through their misconceptions.
Perhaps it’s a willful rejection of the Faith and the demands which God makes on all of us.

But perhaps–and I fear that this is too often the case–the Christians they have encountered on-line and in daily life are poor ambassadors for Christ, braggarts and windbags who hurl insolent arrows of disdain, who take no prisoners in the conversation about First Things.

For the hurts which have been inflicted by self-aggrandized Christians, Bob, please accept my sincere apology. But please don’t let the fractious arguments of a vocal minority represent the Faith. Please consider the more respectful apologists for Faith, and open the pages of C.S. Lewis’ Mere Christianity or Lee Strobel’s The Case for Christ or Josh McDowell’s Evidence That Demands A Verdict. Read Thomas Aquinas or Peter Kreeft or John Paul II.

As for my readers: I really do try to maintain some decorum in my combox, and I deeply regret that the harsh words of some are so off-putting. Please, dear readers, criticize IDEAS and not PEOPLE.

And so, as Tiny Tim observed in Dickens’ immortal work, “God bless us. Every one.”

Atheism

Books

Faith

Previous Post

December 21, 2014

God Showed Up in Our Neighborhood

Next Post

December 23, 2014 Liberal Blog's Diatribe Against the Knights of Columbus

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #Synod14 Abortion Abstinence Abuse Addiction Adoption Advent Adventure Advertising Aging Agnosticism All Saints Day All Souls Day Amish Anathema Angels Anglican Animals Annulment Annunciation Apocalypse Apologetics Apostles Apostleship of the Sea Apparitions Archangels Archbishop Cordileone Archbishop Dolan Archbishop Vigneron Archeology Architecture Art Art Buchwald Ash Wednesday Assisted Suicide Astronauts Atheism Athletes Babies Baptism Beatification Beauty Bible Biochemistry Bioethics Birds Bishop Lori Bishops Blasphemy Books Canon Law Canonization Capital Punishment Cardinal Burke Cardinal Dolan Cardinal George Caritas Catechesis Catechism of the Catholic Church Catholic Catholic Education Catholic Higher Education Catholic Social Teaching Celibacy Cemeteries Character Charity Chastity Cheapskate Christian Unity Christmas Churches Civil Rights Cloning Comedy Communion of Saints Community Kitchens Confession Confirmation Conscience Consequences Consistory Constitution Contraception Conversion Cooking Councils of the Church Creativity Criminal Justice Cristero War Crucifixion Crystal Cathedral Culture Death Death and Dying Death Penalty Department of Health and Human Services Diaconate Dictatorship of Relativism Dignity Disability Discrimination Dissidence Divorce Doctors of the Church Early Church Fathers Easter Economics Ecumenism Education Encyclicals Environmentalism Episcopal Church Eucharist Euthanasia Evangelism Evangelists Evangelization Evolution Excuses Facebook Faith Families Family Fashion Fasting Fatherhood Federal Government Feminism Fiction Film First Amendment First Communion For Greater Glory Forgiveness Free Speech Friends Friendship Gender Discrimination Germany Gnosticism Good Friday Government Grace Greed Gregorian Calendar Happiness Health Heaven Heresy History Holidays Holiness Hollywood Holy Land Holy Saturday Holy Spirit Holy Week Holy Year Home Sweet Home Homosexuality Hope Humanism Humility Humor Imagination Immaculate Conception Immigration Impulsivity In Vitro Fertilization Incarnation Indulgences Infallibility Internet Islam Italy Jerusalem Jesus Judaism Justice Kathleen Sebelius Labor Movement LCWR Lent Life Literature Liturgy Lourdes Love Magi Marketing Marriage Martyrdom Martyrs Mary Mass Media Medical Ethics Mexico Michigan Miracles Missionaries Modernism Modesty Monks Monothelitism Motherhood Movies Mushrooms Music Muslim Mystery Mysticism Mythology Nativity Natural Law Nature New Evangelization New Media New Year New Year's Resolutions Nostalgia Obscenity Occult Old Testament Origen Orthodox Orvieto Pallium Papacy Parenting Patience Patriarch Bartholomew Patriotism Peace Peace and Justice Penitence Pentecost People Persecution Philosophy Poetry Political activism Political Correctness Politics Polls Pop Culture Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope John XXIII Pope Paul VI Pope St. Pius X Pope Urban VII Population Prayer Preaching Prejudice Pride Priesthood Pro-Life Protestantism Psychology Purgatory Queenship of Mary Racism Rape Real Presence Reconciliation Reformation Relics Religious Religious Liberty Reliquary Renewal Reproductive Technology Resurrection Rights Romance Rome Royalty Sacraments Sacred Heart Saints Satanism Science Science Fiction Scripture Seal of Confession Secularism Seniors September 11 Seventy Times Seven Sexuality Sharks Sin Smoking Social Communications Social Justice Social Networking Social Sciences Space Exploration Spirituality Sports St. Luke St. Patrick's Day St. Paul St. Peter St. Teresa of Avila Stations of the Cross Steve Jobs Superstition Supreme Court Symbolism Synod Technology Teen Rebellion Television Terrorism Thankfulness Thanksgiving Theology Think This, Not That Tobit Toilets Toys Tradition Traditions Transplants Travel Trinity Twitter U.S. Air Force Uncategorized United Nations USCCB Valentine Vatican Vatican Archives Vatican Blogfest Virtue Vocations Where We Pray White Heart Women World Day of Social Communications World Meeting of Families World News World Youth Day Worship Writing Year of Consecrated Life Year of Faith Year of Mercy Youth

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What special power did Joseph have?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Interpreting dreams Fighting giants Building altars Writing scrolls