Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Religious Music & Entertainment
PBS’ ‘American Masters’ Examines the Sacramental Strangeness of ‘Flannery’

PBS’ ‘American Masters’ Examines the Sacramental Strangeness of ‘Flannery’

Last updated on: March 21, 2021 at 8:51 pm by Kate O'Hare

PBS’ ‘American Masters’ Examines the Sacramental Strangeness of ‘Flannery’ 2021-03-21T20:51:04-08:00 Kate O'Hare

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Flannery O’Connor/Credit: Courtesy of Joe McTyre

“The Catholic imagination is about revelation,” says Father Mark Bosco, S.J., referring to Georgia-born Catholic writer Flannery O’Connor. “Something’s revealed that might have been concealed, as opposed to just a prophetic or kind of witness stance that happens in some artists. But O’Connor, I think, is the best.”

On Tuesday, March 23, at 8 p.m. ET/PT (check local listings), PBS’ American Masters presents Flannery, directed by Bosco, of Georgetown University, and Elizabeth Coffman, of Loyola University. Among the money needed to finish this profile of Flannery O’Connor (1925-1964) was $200,000 from the first Library of Congress Lavine/Ken Burns Prize, in 2019.

At the time, Burns said:

FLANNERY is an extraordinary documentary that allows us to follow the creative process of one of our country’s greatest writers. It also provides us a glimpse into her life, including her Catholic faith, her unusual sensitivity to race as a Southern white woman, and her daily struggles with illness and the prospect and reality of an early mortality.

The story is beautifully told and captures the power of her Southern birth and life. We’re hopeful that a new generation of readers will re-discover the writings of Flannery O’Connor because of this film.

“American Masters was always our North Star,” says Bosco. “We always thought that this was where our film belonged anyway.”

Mark Bosco: “So, she kind of shakes us all up, no matter where we are or where we stand, but she was very much aware of that. Her stories could bring to anybody a kind of moment of instability and transcendence at the same time.”

Beloved of many Catholics — and non-Catholics — O’Connor, who died young of the autoimmune disease lupus, is not an easy writer to understand. Although her faith informed the lens through which she saw the world, she always looked at life and people straight-on, without romanticism or sentimentality.

As O’Connor herself observed:

The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.

She populated her stories and novels with characters that often seemed bizarre and grotesque, far from grace but still haunted by it.

Says Bosco, “She’s aware that something significant has happened in the 20th Century, after two World Wars, after atomic holocaust, after the Jewish Holocaust, that she’s very much at that moment of when the ‘God is dead’ movement of the ’50s and ’60s and early ’70s.

“I just think that O’Connor, because of that, goes, ‘That’s my audience. My audience are the people who have been really traumatized by this and have chosen to either ignore religious sensibility, or if not ignore, really reject it.’

“So, she kind of shakes us all up, no matter where we are or where we stand, but she was very much aware of that. Her stories could bring to anybody a kind of moment of instability and transcendence at the same time.”

Featuring excerpts from O’Connor’s stories, read by Mary Steenburgen, Flannery talks to people who knew the writer, admired her work or, in the case of Tommy Lee Jones and Brad Dourif, starred in film adaptations.

Mark Bosco: “I do believe she lived and breathed racism in her life, but that she was not conscious of it and not trying to always engage it, interrogate it in her stories, and that seems to be missing.”

But as with all things in our current age, O’Connor’s life and work have come under fresh scrutiny, focused on her attitudes, as a Southerner, towards matters of race. In June 2020, Paul Elie, a senior fellow at Georgetown’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, wrote How Racist Was Flannery O’Connor? for the New Yorker.

With the 2014 revelation of bigoted attitudes in letters from O’Connor’s late teens, Elie writes,

It’s not fair to judge a writer by her juvenilia. But, as she developed into a keenly self-aware writer, the habit of bigotry persisted in her letters.

Elie mentions the Flannery film, and while he praises O’Connor’s published work, her private correspondence continues to trip him up. He writes:

This has put her champions in a bind—upholding her letters as eloquently expressive of her character, but carving out exceptions for the nasty parts.

Bosco says, “It was an unfortunate article because it was a bit like clickbait. … And it’s true that there’s a kind of a cancel culture out there, as you speak, but I do think that ultimately it was a shallow, or if not shallow, at least a very simple kind of piece of algebra, to say that Flannery O’Connor was a racist.

“I do believe she lived and breathed racism in her life, but that she was not conscious of it and not trying to always engage it, interrogate it in her stories, and that seems to be missing.”

He adds, “O’Connor was somebody who definitely understood that something was changing, that she herself had to change, and that ultimately, because of the presumptions of her whiteness and of her class, she always had to recover from it over and over again throughout her life.”

Says Coffman, “We respect Paul Elie, the writer. We respect a lot of his work in the past. … [novelist] Alice Walker, one of our interview subjects, signed a petition after that New Yorker article came out, also seeing it as sort of a clickbait-y, so-called cancel culture, that was easy pickings, but really not based on research.

“And as we say to everyone, just read her fiction. Just read the fiction she was writing when she was 22 that was about racial interconnections, and then come back to this question.”

Another of the Flannery interviewees is Pulitzer Prize-winning New Yorker staff writer Hilton Als. In his lengthy New Yorker piece from January 2001, called This Lonesome Place: Flannery O’Connor on Race and Religion in the Unreconstructed South, the Brooklyn-born son of black immigrants from Barbados wrote:

Her black characters are not symbols defined in opposition to whiteness; they are the living people who were, physically at least, on the periphery of O’Connor’s own world. She was not romantic enough to take Faulkner’s Dilsey view of blacks—as the fulcrum of integrity and compassion. She didn’t use them as vessels of sympathy or scorn; she simply—and complexly—drew from life.

As Flannery outlines, through the interviews, original animation, vintage photos and film, and O’Connor’s own words, her fiction unsettled those in her own time, and has shocked, intrigued and enticed generations since.

O’Connor had one thing to cling to — the Church. But it was a rock with sharp edges.

As the world changes, different aspects of her stories rise and fall in their ability to disturb, repel and attract. Devoutly Catholic, she spoke — and still speaks — to a world that has increasingly rejected God. So, as she wrote:

When you can assume that your audience holds the same beliefs you do, you can relax and use more normal means of talking to it; when you have to assume it does not, then you have to make your vision apparent by shock — to the hard-of-hearing, you shout, and for the almost-blind, draw large and startling figures.

Driven to the margins by her shy but prickly nature, her talent, her Catholicism (on the list of things hated by the KKK), the strangeness of her stories, and ultimately her illness, O’Connor had one thing to cling to — the Church. But it was a rock with sharp edges.

She wrote in a letter:

What people don’t realize is how much religion costs. They think faith is a big electric blanket, when of course it is the Cross. It is much harder to believe than not to believe. If you feel you can’t believe, you must at least do this: keep an open mind. Keep it open toward faith, keep wanting it, keep asking for it, and leave the rest to God.

Because, after all, as O’Connor wrote, in another letter,

I have enough energy to write with, and as that is all I have any business doing anyhow, I can with one eye squinted take it all as a blessing.

Image: Courtesy of Joe McTyre

Don’t miss a thing: Subscribe to all that I write at Authory.com/KateOHare

About Kate O'Hare

Based in Los Angeles, Kate O'Hare is a veteran entertainment journalist, Social Media Manager for Family Theater Productions and a rookie screenwriter. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

March 20, 2021

'Genius: Aretha': Cynthia Erivo Sizzles as the Queen of Soul in Balanced Biopic

Next Post

March 25, 2021 Post Removed

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category books breaking news digital media Faith practice food interview jane the virgin media movies music NFL Pope Francis Showbiz 101 social media sports technology television Uncategorized video

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz