The Creation Conundrum

Last updated on: July 8, 2013 at 3:18 pm by Karen Spears Zacharias

The Creation Conundrum 2013-07-08T15:18:17+00:00 Karen Spears Zacharias

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo by Alexandra Sophie “Empty Nest”

Here’s the thing I don’t understand about the Affordable Care Act. If the government can force private employees to provide insurance that will pay for contraceptives, then why isn’t the reverse true – why doesn’t the Affordable Care Act force employers to provide insurance to pay for fertility treatments for those woman having trouble getting pregnant?

If the federal government can demand that an employer provide health insurance that covers the cost of abortions, then why can’t the federal government also mandate the provision of health care that allows couples longing for babies a chance at conceiving one?

Yes, I understand that there was a time when infertility treatment was considered experimental, a risk. But then again, there was a time when open-heart surgery was considered experimental but most insurance companies cover that now.

As far as I know there is no ceiling cap on how many abortions a woman can have. No limit to how many different forms of contraceptives a couple may access. So if employers – even those whose faith traditions are in direct conflict with the use of contraceptives or abortion – are forced to make provision according to the Affordable Care Act, then doesn’t it only seem equitable that the Affordable Care Act also make provision for couples in need of fertility treatment?

It’s not like infertility is a new problem. American fertility rates hit a historical low in the late 1800s. So, we have been struggling with a creation conundrum for well over a century.

Currently, according to the Center for Disease Control, the number of women with an impaired ability to get pregnant is 6.7 million. An estimated 1.5 million married woman have been unable to conceive even after a year of unprotected sex with their husbands. In other words, 20 percent of all couples looking to conceive in the US are having problems.

But if those couples want to do even the most basic of fertility procedures, they are looking at paying thousands of dollars out-of-pocket.

Does that make any sense?

Why are there no headlines about the infertile lobbying Congress for health care? Why is there no collective voice demanding that these discriminatory laws that favor fecund couples be changed?

Somebody please explain to me, why we Americans consider it noble to champion the prevention of a life, and the termination of a life, but not the creation of a life?

Could it be because infertility is just another one of those “female” issues that a mostly male Congress chooses to ignore?

I bet if it was the men who birthed the babies, the powers that be would have mandated better insurance coverage for infertility a long time ago.

Karen Spears Zacharias is author of the forthcoming Mother of Rain (Mercer University Press).

Previous Post

July 6, 2013

Oh, Brother

Next Post

July 9, 2013 Surrounded by the Honorable

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category child abuse Military ministry pop culture prayer Sports Uncategorized Veterans Day

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz