Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Just and Sinner

Home
Evangelical
"Who's right, St. Paul or St. James?" The Formula of Concord on faith and its fruit.

"Who's right, St. Paul or St. James?" The Formula of Concord on faith and its fruit.

Last updated on: November 22, 2014 at 6:21 pm by trentdemarest

"Who's right, St. Paul or St. James?" The Formula of Concord on faith and its fruit. 2014-11-22T18:21:47-06:00 trentdemarest

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Kretzmann says that James the Less wrote the Epistle. If he’s wrong…oh, well.

When people try to undermine justification sola fide as it is taught in Romans with James chapter 2, all of the explanation you need can be found in the Formula of Concord, Article III.

The question answered by James 2:20 is not “How is a man justified?” but rather “How do you see that a man is justified?” And the answer is: the same way you see that a tree is good. If someone is a Christian, you will see the effects (good works), and thus be able to induce the cause (faith). And relax! This recognition is a gospel thing, not a law thing—like predestination.

Now, if you simply see someone’s good works, you cannot for that reason alone conclude that he is a Christian. Why not? Because without the confession of faith in Christ, “good works” are not the fruit of faith, but of the opinio legis, flowing from either fear or Pharisaism.

With that said, it is always a genuinely uplifting experience to suspect that someone is a Christian because of their kindness (cf. Galatians 5:22-23), and then learn that your suspicion was correct. Dostoevsky talks about the “physiognomy” of a man revealing something of his soul. It’s certainly not a science, nor is it really even an art; i.e., there’s no way to get from “I was delighted to learn that my co-worker is indeed a Christian, as I suspected!” to “I’m a certified fruit inspector.” No; rather, it is an unlooked-for blessing when you recognize a brother or sister in Christ whom you had never met before. It’s a mystery, a bit of je ne sais quoi. But when it does happen, it certainly does warm the heart.

+ + +

Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, Art. III: “Of The Righteousness of Faith before God”, 42-43

42] Many disputations also are usefully and well explained by means of this true distinction, of which the Apology treats in reference to the passage James 2:20. For when we speak of faith, how it justifies, the doctrine of St. Paul is that faith alone, without works, justifies (Romans 3:28), inasmuch as it applies and appropriates to us the merit of Christ, as has been said. But if the question is, wherein and whereby a Christian can perceive and distinguish, either in himself or in others, a true living faith from a feigned and dead faith, (since many idle, secure Christians imagine for themselves a delusion in place of faith, while they nevertheless have no true faith), the Apology gives this answer: James calls that dead faith where good works and fruits of the Spirit of every kind do not follow. And to this effect the Latin edition of the Apology says:

Iacobus recte negat, nos tali fide iustificari, quae est sine operibus, hoc est, quae mortua est.

That is: “St. James teaches correctly when he denies that we are justified by such a faith as is without works, which is dead faith.”

43] But James speaks, as the Apology says, concerning the works of those who have already been

justified through Christ, reconciled with God, and obtained forgiveness of sins through Christ. But if the question is, whereby and whence faith has this, and what appertains to this that it justifies and saves, it is false and incorrect to say:

Fidem non posse iustificare sine operibus; vel fidem, quatenus caritatem, qua formatur, coniunctam habet, iustificare; vel fidei, ut iustificet, necessariam esse praesentiam bonorum operum; vel bona opera esse causam sine qua non, quae per particulas exclusivas ex articulo iustificationis non excludantur.

That is: That faith cannot justify without works; or that faith justifies or makes righteous, inasmuch as it has love with it, for the sake of which love this is ascribed to faith [it has love with it, by which it is formed]; or that the presence of works with faith is necessary if otherwise man is to be justified thereby before God; or that the presence of good works in the article of justification, or for justification, is needful, so that good works are a cause without which man cannot be justified, and that they are not excluded from the article of justification by the particulae exclusivae: absque operibus etc., that is, when St. Paul says: “without works.” For faith makes righteous only inasmuch as and because, as a means and instrument, it lays hold of, and accepts, the grace of God and the merit of Christ in the promise of the Gospel.

+SDG+

Did you like what you read here?

Would you consider supporting me

with my ongoing seminary expenses?

Please click here to take a look at my

seminary fund donations page. Thank you!

Previous Post

November 21, 2014

Episode 24: This is my body? Really?

Next Post

November 24, 2014 Fr. Jack Whritenour defines the term "Evangelical Catholic"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Lutheran Classics Blog Posts Book Review Christian Dogmatics Course Church Resources Curtis Leins Dogmatic Theology Ethics FAQs Historical Theology Just & Sinner Publications Luther Quotations Podcast Sermons The American Lutheran Theological Journal The complete works of Revere Franklin Weidner Theology Proper Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the correct sequence of the fruit of the Spirit as listed in Galatians?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control Love, joy, peace, kindness, goodness, forbearance, faithfulness, self-control, gentleness Love, peace, joy, kindness, forbearance, faithfulness, goodness, self-control, gentleness Joy, love, peace, goodness, kindness, faithfulness, forbearance, gentleness, self-control