Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Just and Sinner

The Papacy and Matthew 16

Last updated on: June 9, 2014 at 11:43 pm   by Jordan Cooper

The Papacy and Matthew 16 2014-06-09T23:43:07-06:00 Jordan Cooper

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. (Matt. 16:18-19)

This particular text has historically been at the center of Roman Catholic and Protestant polemics. Roman apologists have utilized this text as an establishment of the Papal office. It is argued that Jesus grants the keys of the kingdom to Peter, that he is the rock upon which the church is built, and that these keys are consequently passed down to various successors of St. Peter. The context and syntax of this passage demonstrate, however, that Matthew has no intention of promoting the foreign concept of a Roman Papacy through the words of Jesus.

There is an obvious wordplay in this text, wherein Peter is parallel to “the rock.” If no such wordplay was intended, than Jesus would have used the more common term λιθός, rather than πέτρα to refer to the rock. The name Cephas, or Peter, was given to Simon by Jesus himself. After Peter’s great confession, Jesus is confirming the validity and accuracy of that title. Roman interpreters have argued that there is an exact identification between Πέτρος(Peter) and πέτρα (rock). This interpretation cannot be sustained. Πέτρα is a feminine noun, whereas Πέτρος is masculine. This makes it likely though there is a relationship between the two, they are not identical. It is instead something about Peter that the church is built upon, not his person. The “rock” is the confession Peter makes that Jesus is the Christ and Son of God. Some Roman theologians have purported that the original Aramaic word kepha would have allowed for no differentiation between the name “Peter” and “rock.” This claim is completely irrelevant, because the exegete must attend to the text of Matthew’s gospel itself rather than making inferences about what Jesus might have said in Aramaic. The other major issue with this interpretation is that Jesus’ words switch from the second to third person. He says: “You are Peter,” and does not continue by saying, “and upon you, Peter,” but instead he says: “upon this rock.” The fact that, while still addressing Peter directly, Jesus switches from σύ to ταύτη, makes it apparent that Jesus does not intend any direct identification between Peter and the rock upon which the church is built.

The most problematic aspect of this passage for the Roman Catholic interpreter is simply that there is no indication of the conferring of Peter’s status as “the rock” to his successors, nor is there any indication of exactly what it would mean for Peter to be the rock upon which the church was built. Even if one were to grant, as some protestant interpreters do,[1] that Jesus does identify Peter as the rock, there are no grounds for importing an idea of apostolic succession into the narrative. There is no such concept mentioned by Matthew. Paul writes in Ephesians that the church is built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph. 2:20). If Peter were “the rock” spoken of in this text, then it would be in the same sense that the other apostles and prophets are foundation stones for the church. Jesus is speaking here to a person, not to an office that would not be established for some decades. The Roman interpretation has no textual basis to stand upon.

 

[1] See, for example: France, The Gospel of Matthew, 621-622.

Blog Posts

Ecclesiology

Papacy

Roman Catholicism

Previous Post



June 9, 2014

What exactly is the problem with Gerhard Forde and the "Radical Lutherans"

Next Post



June 10, 2014 Pentecost 2014


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Lutheran Classics Blog Posts Book Review Christian Dogmatics Course Church Resources Curtis Leins Dogmatic Theology Ethics FAQs Historical Theology Just & Sinner Publications Luther Quotations Podcast Sermons The American Lutheran Theological Journal The complete works of Revere Franklin Weidner Theology Proper Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Philippians, Paul says to work out your salvation with what?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fear and trembling Faith and obedience Prayer and fasting Joy and thanksgiving

Related posts from Just and Sinner

Evangelical

A Critique of the Papacy

Just and Sinner

Evangelical

Does Revelation 12 Teach the Bodily Assumption of...

Just and Sinner

Evangelical

A New Book on Church and Ministry

Just and Sinner

Evangelical

Semper Vendenda!?: Was the Reformation about Creative Marketing...

Just and Sinner

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube