On Gay “Marriage”

Last updated on: July 22, 2015 at 3:58 pm by ericphillips

On Gay “Marriage” 2015-07-22T15:58:18-06:00 ericphillips

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(by Eric Phillips)

The practice of homosexuality is a sin. It’s not just a perversion of nature; it’s clearly condemned in both the Old Testament and the New Testament (e.g. Lev. 20:13, Rom. 1:22-27). But God has not called upon civil government to criminalize every sin,* and we, as Americans, are just as happy He hasn’t. We like our freedoms. We like it when the state stays out of the personal lives of consenting adults. We stand up for the other guy’s civil rights because in so doing, we are standing up for our own as well. So maybe some of us are wondering what makes gay “marriage” such a big deal. How is this different from the basic protection of personal rights for homosexuals? Why is this different?

The difference lies in the re-definition of the word (and legal institution of) “marriage.” It would have been reasonable for the state to come up with a new kind of civil union modeled on marriage in order to handle issues of inheritance, taxation, visitation rights, etc.—the legal side of the institution. But the movement jumped right over this solution and instead attacked marriage.

Let there be no mistake, it was an attack. So-called “marriage equality” has undermined marriage in the same way sappers used to undermine walls in ancient warfare, cutting out from under it the grounds of nature, civilization, and divine institution—its reasons for being. “And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. …Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Gen. 2:22, 24). Even those who do not recognize these words as God’s Word can recognize in them a rational and universal definition. A marriage is naturally male-and-female because these are the two halves of the human race, which together produce more human beings, whom the spouses then nourish and protect and educate in a unit known as the Family, which is more basic even than the State. Marriage is the basic building block of every human civilization that has ever existed. But now the Supreme Court has redefined it as nothing more than a voluntary union of two otherwise unrelated adults who claim to love one another.

This completely arbitrary definition has no chance of standing for long. Why just two adults? Why can’t they be from the same family? No answer can be given that’s even half as convincing as the answers that have already been ignored. It seems unavoidable that polygyny, polyandry, group marriage, and incestuous marriage have already been approved in principle, now that marriage has been ruled a pure act of the will, unmoored from any natural or historical definition. And as we have already seen in several well-publicized cases involving bakers, there’s a whole new kind of legal bullying that’s possible now, targeting anyone who dares to let his religious convictions (with respect to this issue) affect the way he conducts his business.

It may be a position that attracts scorn, hatred, and even litigation, but we as Christians are going to have to be stubborn about this. God has defined marriage: first biologically, by making us male and female; second by His revelation, telling us expressly in Genesis 2 that this is what He has done; third, by forbidding homosexuality along with every other practice that would destroy or replace marriage (adultery, fornication, divorce); fourth, by revealing to us that He has intended marriage to be a picture of the union between Christ and the Church (Eph. 5:22-33). Human governments are not able change that definition. They can misuse the word, and they can arbitrarily grant to certain other kinds of sexual relationships the same legal considerations they have traditionally given to married couples, but that is the extent of their power.

*It was criminalized in Old Testament Israel, by God’s command, but Israel was a theocracy, having no purely civil government. The only other theocratic polity in the Bible (and the only one existing in the world today) is the Church, and the Church has not been given the power of the Sword (Rom. 13:1-7), but of the Keys (Matt. 16:19, 18:18).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 21, 2015

This Week's Program: The Ecclesiastical Text and Textual Criticism

Next Post

July 23, 2015 Why Young Earth Creationism is Too Liberal

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Lutheran Classics Blog Posts Book Review Christian Dogmatics Course Church Resources Curtis Leins Dogmatic Theology Ethics FAQs Historical Theology Just & Sinner Publications Luther Quotations Podcast Sermons The American Lutheran Theological Journal The complete works of Revere Franklin Weidner Theology Proper Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city is home to the headquarters of the Roman Catholic Church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

London Jerusalem Vatican City Paris