If Gender is Flexible, Why Not Race?

Last updated on: June 12, 2015 at 8:49 am by Jordan Cooper

If Gender is Flexible, Why Not Race? 2015-06-12T08:49:44-06:00 Jordan Cooper

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday, an interesting story broke about Rachel Dolezal, a leader in the NAACP in Spokane, Washington. Supposedly, she had been portraying herself as a black woman for quite some time, changing her appearance and stating that she had African American parentage. Her parents spoke to the media, informing the public that her geneology is European. The only non-Caucasian part of her ancestry is Native American, and it makes up a small percentage.

There has been quite a bit of outrage that a white woman would portray herself, and identify herself, with a race that she was not born into. She has received several death threats and angry letters in the past twenty-four hours.

Now, I totally understand the anger. This woman was identifying herself with a race that she is not. Yet, I am left wondering, how is this consistent with the manner in which the media has also treat Bruce Jenner?

Bruce Jenner is considered a hero for discovering his true self. Though born a male, he identifies as a female. And his recent surgeries are now finally aligning his body up with his personality. But many of the same people making this argument regarding Bruce Jenner have become outraged by Rachel Dolezal. So here is my question: If one’s birth gender is flexible and changeable, why not one’s race? Perhaps, like Bruce, Rachel identifies as a black woman inwardly, and now her outward appearance is simply lining up with the inward reality?

If you think Caitlyn is a hero, and that Rachel is a disgrace, ask yourself: why? Where is the consistency? What grounds do you have for arguing that gender is flexible and changeable, but race isn’t?

Previous Post

June 10, 2015

Bad Theology in a Hymn I Really Want to Like

Next Post

June 12, 2015 Theology is Primarily for the Church, Not the Academy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Lutheran Classics Blog Posts Book Review Christian Dogmatics Course Church Resources Curtis Leins Dogmatic Theology Ethics FAQs Historical Theology Just & Sinner Publications Luther Quotations Podcast Sermons The American Lutheran Theological Journal The complete works of Revere Franklin Weidner Theology Proper Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who interpreted Peter's vision about clean and unclean animals?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Philip Barnabas God Paul