Faith is Not an Object of Sight

Last updated on: June 17, 2015 at 7:21 pm by ericphillips

Faith is Not an Object of Sight 2015-06-17T19:21:17-06:00 ericphillips

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(by Eric Phillips)

Our Epistle reading for this past Sunday included the well known verse that says, “We walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Cor. 5:7). In context, St. Paul has just assured his hearers that “if the tent that is our earthly home is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens” (5:1). That is, if this body dies (and we know that will happen some time), we have another one awaiting us in Heaven, in the Resurrection to immortality. But we don’t see it yet; all we see are the flaws and the gradual decay of this body and life. Thus we must proceed in the Christian life by the perception of faith, not of sight. That’s the basic meaning of this verse, but here’s a corollary meaning that can be very important to remember: if we walk by faith, not by sight, that means we can’t expect to see our faith, either.

Sometimes well-meaning Christians exhort other Christians to search within their hearts, to see if they truly have faith. “Do you really believe? How do you know you really believe? What convincing testimony can you offer?” But if it were necessary to see our faith before we could walk by it, then we wouldn’t be “walking by faith, not by sight,” would we? We would really be walking by sight. Self-examination of this kind is poisonous. It gets us into an endless, self-destructive circle, like a snake eating its own tail. “I have to see my faith, so that I can have faith in the things I can’t see.” Faith is not an object of sight, any more than sight itself is. Faith is an alternate means of perception. That’s why Paul instructs us to “walk by faith, not by sight.” It’s either-or. Faith allows us to perceive things that sight cannot perceive: things such as the Resurrection, and the Righteousness that is imputed to us in Christ. If we were impervious to death here and now, we wouldn’t need faith to perceive the Resurrection; simple empirical observation would do the trick. And if we were perfectly righteous in thought and deed, here and now, we wouldn’t need faith to understand that God has made us righteous. But we aren’t, so we do.

Faith is not an object of sight. Nor is faith an object of faith. Often Christians who face the kind of questioning I mentioned in the last paragraph, end up defending themselves by saying, “I believe that I truly believe,” or “I just know that I have faith,” which boils down to the same thing. But faith is not something that can be directly perceived by any mode of perception. Rather, it is itself a kind of perception. Trying to believe in faith makes no more sense than trying to see sight. Faith is not an object to be discovered, proven, measured, or any of that. Faith is not an object at all. Faith is a passive activity that perceives objects—just as sight is. They are parallel senses.

So if faith is not an object, I guess we should be asking, “What is the object of faith?” And now we have the right question. The objects of Christian faith are the promises of God as they are revealed to us in Holy Scripture: that we are forgiven all our sins, that we are the children of God, that we will rise again, that we will live forever in everlasting righteousness, innocence, and blessedness—all through the work of Jesus Christ our Lord, who has died for us and lives again for us, who has called us to faith and baptized us into His body, and feeds us with His body and blood. If someone suggests that you should be turning your eyes or your mind inward, to search your heart for this thing called “faith,” do not go on that wild goose chase. Instead, turn your eyes and your mind outward, to read and hear and consider the promises of God, the work of Jesus Christ, and the Sacraments by which He communicates His salvation to you. This is what you would do if someone suggested that you were blind, isn’t it? You wouldn’t try to study your eyes, or to remember occasions when you think you saw something; you would just open your eyelids and gaze on the world, and disprove the suggestion by actually seeing.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 17, 2015

Q&A Program

Next Post

June 19, 2015 A Biblical Theology of the Family: Creation and Fall

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Lutheran Classics Blog Posts Book Review Christian Dogmatics Course Church Resources Curtis Leins Dogmatic Theology Ethics FAQs Historical Theology Just & Sinner Publications Luther Quotations Podcast Sermons The American Lutheran Theological Journal The complete works of Revere Franklin Weidner Theology Proper Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied against Tyre, predicting it would become a bare rock?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amos Joel Daniel Ezekiel