Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Malaysia Flight 17: The Wreckage of Broken Promises

Last updated on: July 21, 2014 at 8:10 am   by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Malaysia Flight 17: The Wreckage of Broken Promises 2014-07-21T08:10:17-06:00 Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

While the world mourns the devastating loss of nearly 300 lives and the shock of a commercial airline downed by military weapons over Ukraine, we cannot help by ask, “Why?”

Not only why would Russian-backed forces in Ukraine shoot down a civilian plane, but why is Russia grasping for control of Ukraine in the first place?

A generation after the so-called end of the cold war, why are Americans once again afraid of the Russians, demonizing its president as a barbarian who rides horseback shirtless?

As it happens, on the same day Malaysia Flight 17 was downed, former CIA analyst Ray McGovern tried to explain the struggle in Ukraine in an op-ed for the Baltimore Sun.

Absent from U.S. media encomia for recently deceased former Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze is any mention of the historic deal he reached with his U.S. counterpart James Baker in 1990 ensuring that the Soviet empire would collapse “with a whimper, not a bang” (Mr. Baker’s words).

Mr. Baker keeps repeating that the Cold War “could not have ended peacefully without Shevardnadze.” But he and others are silent on the quid pro quo. The quid was Moscow’s agreement to swallow the bitter pill of a reunited Germany in NATO; the quo was a U.S. promise not to “leapfrog” NATO over Germany farther East. Washington welched on the deal.

It’s well worth reading the whole article. But the take-away is clear from the lede: 300 civilians died as casualties of a war incited by America breaking its promises for 15 years. Ukraine, as it turns out, is the tipping point in the balance of power that was negotiated to end the cold war. The Russians are playing the same game the US is. Only they know they’ve been cheated.

Does this history in any way justify the horrendous evil of shooting down a civilian plane? By no means. But we who are baffled by extremism would do well to try to understand the source of conflicts that can so easily spill out into our lives. We learned from 9/11 that there are people who will gladly use a tragedy like this to explain why the power grab they most want is necessary.

300 civilian deaths are senseless, yes. But if we’re willing to face the truth about Ameircan foreign policy, they can be explained. This is a time for serious questions.

Features

CIA

Malaysia Flight 17

Ray McGovern

russia

ukraine

us foreign policy

Previous Post



July 15, 2014

Go to Hell! God's Gracious Word to American Christians

Next Post



July 27, 2014 Our Children's March: What 1963 Can Teach US About the "Border Crisis"


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Features Front Porch Nurturing Communities Testimonies

Select a Month April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What two things does Paul say about those who preach a different gospel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They have fallen from grace Let them be under God's condemnation They are false teachers They will face judgment

Related posts from Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

Arrests Resume As Moral Movement Continues

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

A Palm Sunday Invitation to Holy Ground

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

A White Southerner in the Freedom Movement

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

If Past Is Prologue, Pay Attention to the...

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Pastoral Wisdom for Responding to Sermon Pushback

Getting sermon pushback on your social justice sermon? Learn practical, Proverbs-based strategies...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube