Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

NC Legislature Votes to Preserve Racial Bias

Last updated on: June 13, 2012 at 4:34 pm   by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

NC Legislature Votes to Preserve Racial Bias 2012-06-13T16:34:42-06:00 Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The North Carolina House of Representatives voted yesterday to approve an “amendment” to the Racial Justice Act that essentially repeals it, making it impossible for death row inmates to appeal their capital sentences as two have already done successfully in NC courts since the historic bill became law last year. Rev. William Barber, our NC NAACP President has been an important leader in communicating the importance of this legislation. He spoke out clearly today about the tragic error of yesterday’s vote.

Rev. Dr. William Barber, NC NAACP PresidentBy Rev. William Barber, NC NAACP

Yesterday’s shameful vote by the NC House of Representatives to gut the Racial Justice Act with Paul Stam’s RJA-repeal bill cleverly disguised as an amendment bill is a refusal to deal with the systemic racism and racial disparities that have already been proven by the court of law to exist in our judicial system as it relates to the application of the death penalty.

We know the evidence of this racial disparity is true from history, we know it’s true from certified studies, and we know it’s true because two judges have ruled in favor of the legislation. The death penalty cannot be reversed, and everyone should want to be as sure as possible that there is absolutely no bias in its application. That is why proponents and opponents of the Death Penalty supported the RJA in its current format.

The only conclusion one can come to when you have legislators gut a bill that has already been used in the courts to prove systemic racism exists, is that those legislators do not care about, nor do they want to address, the reality of racial bias in our current legal system. And a refusal to use every tool necessary to root out the racist application of the death penalty is to in fact participate in the injustice itself.

We live in a state where seven men have been exonerated from death row–men who would have been murdered by the state if the system had only worked faster. Five are black, one is Latino and one is white. ALL were charged with the murders of white victims.

Support for the Racial Justice Act is not an endorsement of violence or a sign that anyone is “soft on crime.” Criminal justice enforcement is only strengthened when the system confronts racial bias directly and attempts to rid it from its practices.

All the evidence shows that the death penalty system is flawed with racial bias**. It is bizarre and unthinkable that legislators are striving to maintain the status quo of racism in the death penalty system and steal a tool from the courts to address this abomination.** We hope legislators will wake up and hear their humanity calling on them to change their mind and vote against this bill when it comes up for a final vote.

Finally, we have to ask: If the facts were in the other direction, how would legislators supporting this bill feel about repealing a law that was attempting to address a death penalty system that was 2-3 times more likely to put white defendants to death than their black counterparts? Would they fight to maintain a racially biased system if it were their family members or members of their community who were being racially targeted for the death penalty? Within constitutional and American principles, as a necessary rationale for our pursuit of justice, we should neither excuse nor allow patterns of systemic racism and discrimination. To do so is both unconstitutional and immoral.

We must note that not one African American legislator supported this legislative trickery. Every African American legislator supported the Racial Justice Act in its current form. Every legislator who voted for the repeal bill, which removes tools needed by the courts to root out racial disparity, is white. This alone should cause the legislators voting to repeal the Racial Justice Act to pause and rethink their vote.

The governor should veto this bill and the five Democratic legislators who voted for it should sustain their Governor’s veto and respect the many African Americans and other North Carolinians of good will who supported them.

Even if they override the veto, we will work with our attorneys in the NAACP and in our coalition to make sure all the provisions in our current law are provided to all death row defendants based on the principles of equal protection under the law.

At last year’s Wild Goose Festival in NC, I talked with Rev. Barber about the connections between faith and civil rights activism. You can check out a video here. If you’re in North Carolina, I’d love for your to come out to the Wild Goose Festival next Saturday, June 23, for a day of education and organizing with me, Rev. Barber and other friends.

Features

death penalty

faith-based activism

naacp

racial justice

racism

William Barber

Previous Post



June 12, 2012

A Liturgy for Ordinary Radicals

Next Post



June 15, 2012 Longing for Community


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Features Front Porch Nurturing Communities Testimonies

Select a Month April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Immanuel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God leads God with us God rules God redeems

Related posts from Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

Arrests Resume As Moral Movement Continues

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

Sound the Shofar! Women Lead #MoralWeekofAction

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

Struggle for Racial Justice is Local

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Progressive Christian

Pentecost Power: The Spirit Moving Through Moral Mondays

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube