Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Religious Art
I’m Already Tired of AI Art

I’m Already Tired of AI Art

Last updated on: March 6, 2024 at 3:00 am by John Beckett

0 Comments

I’m Already Tired of AI Art 2024-03-05T19:19:57-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is not a sermon on the ethics of artificial intelligence in general or of AI art in particular.

There are serious ethical issues with the way AI plagiarizes art and with how some companies – and some individuals – use AI to keep from paying artists. Those issues deserve our consideration, particularly as AI grows from its current state as a search engine on steroids to a future when it may approximate or even exceed human intelligence.

This isn’t that conversation. This is something simpler, more basic, more personal.

I’m already tired of AI art.

As with the pictures in last year’s AI In Spiritual Education: Caveat Emptor, do not expect AI illustrations in an essay about the shortcomings of AI. All these are my own photographs.

I’m about to drop out of a couple of goth and dark academia groups I’m in on social media. I’m not an active member in any of them. I never post in the dark academia groups and I post in the goth groups maybe once a year. I just like to follow them, pick up recommendations for new music and books and movies, and enjoy the pictures.

Especially the pictures.

I’m an amateur photographer. I take almost all the pictures you see here on the blog, on Instagram, and anywhere else I post. Technically I’m a professional photographer – I’ve sold two pictures – but let’s not kid ourselves.

I know what I am – I’m a good photographer. I’m not a great photographer. I’m not dedicated enough – and I don’t have enough time on top of everything else I’m doing – to try to become a great photographer. But I am trying to get better. When I see a picture that grabs my attention, I try to figure out how the photographer did it. How much is composition, how much is lighting, how much is post-processing? How much is combining two or more photos to create an image of something that doesn’t exist in the ordinary world?

How did they do it, what can I learn from it, and how can I do something like it myself?

There’s an on-going argument among photographers as to how much “Photoshopping” (I don’t use Photoshop or Lightroom – they’re too expensive and I don’t like the workflow. I use GIMP, which is free and has more features than I’ll ever need, even though most of my professional photographer friends find it clunky) you can do before what you have should no longer be considered a photograph. I don’t find that debate particularly useful. What are you trying to do? Are you trying to document an event or are you creating art? We can enjoy both.

At the same time, I want to know what I’m looking at. Is the image a reasonable representation of what I would see with my own eyes if I was there? Have the colors been adjusted to make it more attractive? Is it something that was real but has been edited into something that’s no longer telling the truth? Most fashion models are painfully thin, but sometimes magazines and websites edit their photos to make them look even thinner. Advertising is some of the most malefic magic in the world.

Or is what you’re seeing something completely made up?

With AI, I’m looking at something that never existed. And that’s OK – people have been doing that ever since they started painting animals on cave walls 30,000 years ago. I enjoy Michelangelo and Van Gogh and even Picasso. But when you look at a painting, you know you’re looking at a painting. Paintings are honest.

AI art pretends to be photographs of people and places that never existed. Or it pretends to be paintings done by real humans. It’s not real. It’s not art. I’m not a luddite – learning which set of keywords will produce the images you want can’t be compared to developing the skills necessary to make actual human art.

At the same time, a cool picture is a cool picture. No, that library that looks like it’s part of Dracula’s castle isn’t real, but it’s still fun and interesting. A hot goth outfit is a hot goth outfit, and if a real person hasn’t dressed like that yet, they probably will in the future. It’s entertainment – stop overthinking everything and just enjoy the pretty pictures.

And so I did.

For a while.

And then the feeds went from an occasional AI picture to an AI picture every day to multiple AI pictures a day. It got old. It stopped being the Victorian drawing room we all wish we had and started being just another AI pic.

A couple years ago I stopped following one of the goth hashtags on Instagram. It got overloaded with thirst traps promoting Only Fans accounts. I like hot goth girls as much as the next straight guy, and if you can make money on Only Fans good for you. But I followed a goth hashtag for music and fashion, not for almost-porn. What was interesting at first became ordinary and then became annoying.

It’s the same with AI art. It’s moved from interesting to ordinary, and now it’s moving from ordinary to annoying.

If I have to stop following some groups I’ve enjoyed in order to remove the annoyance, I will. I’m not enjoying them anymore.

This library exists in the ordinary world. My photo taken in the Old Library, Trinity College, Dublin. 2018.

I’ve played with a couple of the AI image generators. They can be fun, though I lost interest rather quickly. I get why people who have an interest in fantastical things like them. It’s not like you can go visit the Hellfire Club and take pictures with your phone. Most of this isn’t taking work away from actual artists, because in the absence of AI these pictures simply wouldn’t be made.

But for all their technical competence (the number of fingers aside) they have a quality about them that resembles the crayon pictures drawn by preschoolers that end up on refrigerator doors across suburbia.

“Mommy, see what I made! Isn’t it good?”

Whatever we really think, we say nice things about children’s indecipherable drawings because we love our children and we want to encourage them to keep practicing at whatever interests them, or to just enjoy it.

We have no such obligations with adults who use plagiarizing software to create pictures nobody asked for that mock the skill and creativity of actual artists.

And also, I’m tired of them.

Religious Art

Community

artificial intelligence

dark academia

goth

Pagan

Previous Post

March 3, 2024

Learning to Recognize Your Magical Successes

Next Post

March 10, 2024 How to Make a Monster

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Concern about the attitude of Islam toward Pagans is not limited to the Trump Administration. ..."

Maureen Richmond

The Fear of Witchcraft

"Thank you for your much needed review of the Lucas Miles polemic. A key point ..."

Maureen Richmond

I Read Pagan Threat So You ..."

"A number of these are also available streaming through the Kanopy digital service, carried by ..."

C. Lee Vermeers

The Vampire Films of Jean Rollin

"Happy October!"

renniejoy

The Vampire Films of Jean Rollin

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Timothy was instructed to avoid godless chatter and opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE