Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Conversations With A Persistent Proselytizer – The Importance of Foundational Assumptions

Conversations With A Persistent Proselytizer – The Importance of Foundational Assumptions

Last updated on: August 7, 2018 at 3:00 am by John Beckett

Conversations With A Persistent Proselytizer – The Importance of Foundational Assumptions 2018-08-03T19:16:22-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a Pagan blog, written by a Pagan for a Pagan audience. My days of responding to every ludicrous statement by fundamentalists are long gone, largely because my inner fundamentalist is dead. My primary concern is exploring my particular form of Paganism as deeply as I can. Responding to proselytizers is a distraction from that concern.

Lately I’ve been frustrated with more than the usual number of Christians and atheists leaving aggressive comments here and on social media. That led to Sunday’s Letter To Those Who Would Convert Me. My intent was for that to be the last word so I could get back to the business at hand.

Still, I try to respond when Christians and atheists ask questions. Sometimes their questions inspire me to think in a direction I hadn’t considered, even if I don’t end up in the same place they’re trying to lead me. And if they’re asking me these questions, they’re probably asking them to other Pagans too. Sharing debate ammunition is a good thing.

Over the past couple of weeks I’ve had a running conversation in the comments with a Christian (he hasn’t said which flavor and I’m not going to guess) who goes by the name of Jasper38. He asks a lot of questions. Most of them are reasonable-sounding questions, but they carry assumptions that 1) are assumptions and not facts, and 2) are not relevant to a worldview grounded in animism and polytheism.

Jasper had a lot of questions after I posted Do Gods Disappear When Their Worship Ceases? You can read the entire exchange in the comments section to that post. His main question comes down to why the many Gods allowed their worship to cease. I made it very clear in the original post that I don’t know, but I didn’t care for what Jasper implied in his questions. Every time I gave him an answer he moved the goal posts, presumably because I didn’t give him the answer he wanted.

I was about to drop out of the conversation, but I made one last attempt give a definitive answer. It ran rather long, so instead of leaving it buried in the comments I’m going to put it into a new post. I think the principles I articulate in this answer will be helpful to Pagans and polytheists, even though I have no hope that it will satisfy Jasper… and by “satisfy” I mean convince him he’s not going to change my mind.

Jasper: “What I’m trying to get at is, here we are now, with the gods not being worshiped. If our current state is so horrible, then the gods must be evil to have allowed us to get there.”

Now, I never said our current state is horrible. I said that religion is what you do, who you are, and whose you are – it’s where you belong. It’s a way of life. It’s an identity. If people freely choose to change their identity, so be it. But when it is stolen from them, that is an atrocity. And that is what happened to our ancestors whose religions were outlawed when Christianity became the dominate religion.

As he explains later, Jasper is trying to argue that either the Gods are evil for not preserving Their worship, or worship of the Gods doesn’t matter. There are several unstated assumptions in that trap, but at the core this is an attempt to apply the Problem of Evil (theodicy) in an area where it doesn’t belong. Theodicy is a problem in monotheism – it asks how evil can exist when there is one God who is both all-powerful and all-good.

Theodicy is irrelevant in polytheism. Our Gods are mighty and virtuous, but they are neither all-powerful nor all-good (Platonism proposes that they are both and their view might be right, but I find that argument too remote to be of practical use so I don’t use it). Good things happen, bad things happen, the Wheel turns and life goes on. Further, as I explained in the post on good and evil, sometimes virtues are in conflict.

The Problem of Evil has been a philosophical dilemma for monotheism ever since Zoroastrianism began 3500 years ago. None of the Abrahamic religions have a satisfactory answer for it. Expecting one from Pagans – who find the question irrelevant – is unreasonable.

This line of questioning also assumes that human behavior is the Gods’ primary concern, or at least one of their primary concerns. A River Goddess is certainly concerned with the behavior of humans in Her realm (particularly when we go building dams and dumping waste into streams), but Her primary concern is the rocks of the riverbed, the fish swimming in the river, the plants and animals nourished by its water, and the water itself. We are a concern, but we are not the concern.

Does a Sun God even care about humans? We are dependent on the sun for life and so we are good and right to honor the sun and the God of the Sun, but we are one species on one planet circling our one star. Imago Dei is a Christian concept, not a Pagan one. We were not placed on the Earth, we grew out of the Earth.

Now, I can speak from personal experience that the Morrigan is very interested in human activities. She’s a Goddess of Sovereignty and of Battle – both of which deal mainly with human society. I cannot speak for Her in general, but while She has demanded some very specific devotions from me, I’ve been left with the understanding that the primary purpose of those devotions is building and maintaining a relationship: with Her, Her virtues, and Her mission. She doesn’t need my worship, but She gains from it, and so do I. (The Neoplatonists said a God needs nothing and can gain nothing from humans – I do not agree).

When Christianity supplanted native European religions, Brighid became conflated with the Christian saint of the same name. Cerridwen remained in Welsh culture and lore. Other deities were subsumed into the elements and the landscape. The Morrigan pretty much disappeared. The consensus among contemporary Morrigan devotees is that She spent those centuries in the Otherworld, and we have NO idea what she was doing. We just know she’s back, and active. Very, very active.

Jasper: “On the other hand, we seem to have done well without the worship of the many gods, in which case it must be we don’t need them.”

Here Jasper universalizes what is properly individual, or perhaps communal. I did not do well until I committed myself to this Pagan path and to the Gods who have called me. I can rattle off the names of dozens of friends who can say the same thing, and those are just the ones I know. Modern Paganism in all its forms is still a tiny religion, but it is growing, because it speaks to lived experiences of many people here and now.

Further, how can anyone say that, for example, Britain is better off as a Christian nation (officially – in practice they are highly secular) than if it had retained the worship of Anglo-Saxon Gods, or the Gods of the pre-Roman Britons? To be clear – I’m not saying they would certainly be better off, I’m saying there is no way to know. This question presumes that the way things are is better than they would have been otherwise. Maybe yes, maybe no.

I had previously pointed out that the conversion of Europe to Christianity resulted in the death of numerous native religions – it was a cultural genocide. Jasper didn’t seem to think that was very important. I tried to bring the matter into the present and asked “I know you would prefer to see Christianity become the world’s only religion. But can you not see that if, say, Buddhism was to disappear, our world would be a poorer place? Do you understand that the crime European settlers committed against the Native Americans was not just killing people and stealing land, but also destroying entire cultures?”

Jasper: “I can’t see how our world would be a poorer place if Buddhism were to disappear. I don’t see that anything of value would be lost… If right now the entire Buddhist world turned Hindu in the blink of an eye, so that it was as if Buddhism had never even existed, we would be poorer? Is Hinduism lacking something that it cannot take the place of Buddhism? Is Hinduism a deficient religion?”

And this gets to the core of why religions disappearing is a bad thing. It isn’t that Hinduism is a “deficient” religion, it’s that Hinduism is not Buddhism. For someone who wants Buddhism, who needs Buddhism, who has a 2500-year family heritage of Buddhism, Hinduism isn’t good enough. There are concepts and practices in Buddhism that are not present in Hinduism, and vice versa.

Jasper hasn’t told us what flavor of Christianity he practices, but if he’s a Catholic I doubt he’d find the Southern Baptists an adequate substitution, and I know first-hand that if he’s a Baptist he wouldn’t be spiritually fulfilled in the Catholic church.

This part of the argument is predicated on the assumption that there is One True Way, or at least one way that is best for everyone. There is no such thing.

This is the mindset that forbade the Irish and Welsh from speaking their native languages instead of “proper” English, that said slavery was a good thing because it brought Christianity to Africans, and that put Native children in boarding schools to “educate the Indian out of them.” It’s the mindset that destroys 1500 year old statues because they’re part of a different religion. It assumes that my way is the best way and I’m doing people a favor by forcing them to be more like me.

There’s a word for that mindset: evil.

I still have not answered the question of why the Gods allowed their worship to cease. I haven’t answered it because I don’t know. There are things I like to speculate about – this isn’t one of them. Others are free to wonder about it to their heart’s content.

What we know is that the worship of the Many Gods was wiped out in Europe and the Near East, and now Their worship has returned. And I’m very happy about that.

Previous Post

August 5, 2018

A Letter To Those Trying To Convert Me

Next Post

August 9, 2018 A World With Many Religions is Better Than a World With Only One

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Surely this man was the Son of God!" at Jesus' crucifixion?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Judas A Roman centurion Pilate