Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Many Ways To Make A Good Marriage

Many Ways To Make A Good Marriage

Last updated on: April 28, 2015 at 5:44 pm by John Beckett

Many Ways To Make A Good Marriage 2015-04-28T17:44:47-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I had planned to write an analytical piece on today’s Supreme Court hearing on the topic of marriage equality. I had an introduction and a conclusion already written – all I needed was to pull some quotes from the news reports and let it fly. But after staring at the screen for an hour I realized I didn’t really want to write a legal analysis.

I’m not a lawyer. I’m a polytheist who recognizes that different Gods call different people to honor and work with Them in different ways. My devotion to Cernunnos is in no way diminished by your devotion to Freya, and neither of us are diminished by someone else who is devoted to no Gods at all. The question of whose God is best is a topic for light conversation over too much wine, not for fighting over.

The idea that there are many ways to approach matters of great importance flows into other areas of life, including marriage. My marriage to Cathy is typical in many ways and untypical in others. It’s been going strong for 27 years – it works for us. There are things we do that wouldn’t work for most couples and things most couples do that don’t work for us. There are many ways to have a good marriage – we’ve found the right way for us.

In reading the reports of the deliberations as to whether states should be allowed to refuse to recognize the marriages of same sex couples, the key question seems to be “who gets to decide?”

Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court’s lone moderate who likely will cast the deciding vote, put it this way:

The word that keeps coming back to me in this case is millennia, plus time. … This definition (of marriage) has been with us for millennia. And it’s very difficult for the court to say “Oh well, we know better.”

This was countered by attorney Mary Bonauto, who presented the case for same-sex couples:

In terms of the question of who decides, it’s not about the court versus the states. It’s about the individual making the choice to marry and with whom to marry, or the government.

To me, this is where it stops. The government – whether national, state, or local – has no more business telling a same sex couple their marriage is invalid than they do telling Cathy and me our marriage is invalid because we don’t have children.

But like I said in the first paragraph, I really don’t want to do legal analysis. There’s something deeper here, and it was expressed by Joseph Whalen, associate solicitor general for Tennessee:

Tennessee, Ohio, Kentucky and other states with a traditional definition of marriage have done nothing here but stand pat. They have maintained the status quo. And yet other states have made the decision, and it certainly is their right and prerogative to do so, to expand the definition, to redefine the definition, and then to suggest that other states that have done nothing but stand pat now must recognize those marriages imposes a substantial burden on the state’s ability to self-govern.

The key point here isn’t Mr. Whalen’s patently ridiculous idea of a what constitutes a substantial burden. The key point is the harmful but widespread idea that self-governing – the process by which a group of people decide how they will interact with each other – somehow includes the right to dictate to individuals how they must conduct their private relationships and activities. It assumes there is one right way and the majority has the right (if not the responsibility) to insure everyone follows it, whether it works for them or not.

This idea of “one right way” is a product of monotheistic religion and the thinking that flows from it. And it’s used to coerce others into conformance, or at least to hide their differences.

The reaction to Wiccan Priestess Deborah Maynard’s invocation to the Iowa House of Representatives showed how many who support public prayer are only interested in prayers that affirm their own religion. Their way is the only way and everyone else can convert or shut up.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This argument isn’t over states’ rights or the role of the courts in the political process. It’s about the normalization of homosexuality. “The love that dare not speak its name” is now no big deal for most people in the West, particularly for young people. Unfortunately, those who still fear homosexuality are disproportionately older and more powerful and they are using all their power to try to reinforce their idea of the One True Way.

They are losing, but gay and lesbian couples shouldn’t have to wait till the old guard dies off to have their marriages recognized by the state and to enjoy the rights and responsibilities that the state grants married couples.

For my Christian friends who insist your religion condemns homosexuality: 1) there are plenty of your fellow Christians who disagree, and 2) no one is asking you to marry someone of the same sex. Feel free to make your case in the marketplace of ideas, but do not expect your religious beliefs to carry the force of law.

I don’t know how this case will be decided. Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan will vote for marriage equality. Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will vote against it. Chief Justice Roberts is likely to vote against it, although he is less of a conservative ideologue than the other three and may want to be seen as being on the right side of history.

The decision is likely to come down to Anthony Kennedy. Justice Kennedy has generally supported gay rights, including the landmark Lawrence v Texas case in 2003 that overturned Texas’ law against same sex relations. But nothing is certain.

One way or another, the court’s decision will change the law of the land, but it cannot change the basic facts: there are many ways to make a good marriage.

Previous Post

April 26, 2015

A Druid With a Camera

Next Post

May 1, 2015 Beltane – A Holy Day

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was crucified and rose again after three days?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses John the Baptist Paul Jesus