Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Religious Freedom, Religious Bullying

Religious Freedom, Religious Bullying

Last updated on: July 3, 2014 at 5:00 pm by John Beckett

Religious Freedom, Religious Bullying 2014-07-02T18:47:15-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

From the Pilgrims of 1620 to today, the issue of religious freedom has never been far from the front of American society. Yet it seems that what is called religious freedom all too often is closer to religious bullying. The Puritans escaped persecution in England and promptly started hanging Quakers in Massachusetts. Mormons were run out of Illinois in the 19th century – in the 21st century they helped finance the campaign against marriage equality and just last week made headlines excommunicating Kate Kelly for advocating for the ordination of women. There are more examples than I care to consider.

This week the issue of religious freedom came up in the Hobby Lobby case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court decided that an employer can pick and choose which health services to provide to its employees based on the religious beliefs of its leaders, so long as those beliefs are sincerely held.

I’ve read the ruling and the dissent. I’ve thought long and hard about this case and what I wanted to say about it. And as much as I’d like to make a sweeping claim to absolute truth, I think Justice Alito got one thing right in the majority opinion: this case has conflicting priorities and needed to be decided narrowly.

While I will scream to the mountaintops that “corporate personhood” is a pernicious lie, I do not argue that individuals cannot bring their religious beliefs and practices into the workplace and into the marketplace. I would be quite hypocritical if I did, since I try to exemplify and promote my Pagan values of honesty, reciprocity, compassion, and reverence for Nature in my professional work. The owners of Hobby Lobby have the right to run their business according to their religious values.

But that right is not absolute. I see three reasons why this case should have been decided against Hobby Lobby.

Through the political process we have chosen to fund our health care through employers. This is, I think, a monumentally stupid choice. Employers have their hands full trying to run their businesses – they are not experts on health care, they have only a tangential interest in insuring it is provided properly, and they have a strong personal interest in minimizing their costs. But as with so many established practices, those who benefit from the current system (i.e. – drug and insurance companies) fight any attempts to reform it.

That’s another rant for another time. What’s important here is that under our current social contract and under current law, Hobby Lobby has an obligation to pay for its employees’ health care – and health care includes reproductive health.

Our culture has the idea that paying for something means the right to control it. But when it comes to our common obligations, this simply isn’t true.

It pains my conscience that I am forced to pay taxes to purchase execution drugs. This goes beyond my political opinion that our criminal justice system needs to be seriously reformed and our prison system drastically shrunk. The State of Texas is killing people and I am forced to participate in it, against some of my strongest religious beliefs. Likewise, the federal government spends the tax money of committed pacifists to support their wars of empire.

We don’t get to pick and choose which common obligations we support and which we decline to fund. As much as the libertarians among us would argue that we should, practicality insists we cannot. Kickstarter and Indiegogo are great for funding art projects; they’re not so great for funding roads, schools, national defense – or health care. Our democratic input into the funding process is through elections, not through the power of the purse.

Hobby Lobby has an obligation to pay for its employees’ health care, and health care includes reproductive health.

Though apparently it did not come up in the Supreme Court hearing, some have raised doubts as to the sincerity of the Hobby Lobby owners’ beliefs about contraception and abortion. This is the second reason why this case should have been decided the other way. Hobby Lobby has invested in the same companies who make the birth control drugs they refuse to cover. And they purchase countless products from China, whose policies on abortion and family planning are at odds with Hobby Lobby’s stated values.

Making hard choices in support of your religious beliefs and values is a sign of spiritual maturity. Making easy choices for yourself and forcing hard choices on others is not.

And that brings me to the third reason why this ruling is wrong. Those who support Hobby Lobby argue that they have not made it impossible for their employees to obtain contraception, and this is true. They’ve just made it harder. But for those near the bottom of the economic order – which includes most people who work in retail – the difference between “hard” and “impossible” is pretty small. In what can be a critical life decision, Hobby Lobby’s owners are attempting to substitute their values and their judgment for the values and judgment of their employees, not through intellectual discourse or moral suasion but through economic coercion.

If the wrong contraceptive decision is made, it is the employees and not the owners of Hobby Lobby who will bear the consequences. Health care decisions belong with the individuals involved and their medical and spiritual advisors, not their employers.

Before the ruling was issued, I was certain it would be a 5-4 decision. The four conservative justices would rule for the corporation and the four liberal justices would rule for the individual. The decision came down, as it does so often, to Anthony Kennedy. Justice Kennedy, sadly, picked the wrong side. I hope this ruling really is as limited as Justice Alito says it is and lower courts do not attempt to use it to allow discrimination in public accommodations as many in the religious right would like to be able to do.

Religious freedom means you are free to believe, worship, and practice as you see fit. It means you are free to advocate for your religion in the public square. It means you are free to live your life by your values and to encourage others to do the same.

It does not mean you are free to coerce others to believe, practice, or behave as you would prefer, nor does it mean you are free to ignore your obligations to our wider society.

That’s not freedom. That’s bullying.

Previous Post

July 1, 2014

Showing Up

Next Post

July 6, 2014 Exercising Your Will

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Surely this man was the Son of God!" at Jesus' crucifixion?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Judas A Roman centurion Pilate