Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
The Global Public Square

The Global Public Square

Last updated on: August 25, 2013 at 3:32 pm by John Beckett

The Global Public Square 2013-08-25T15:32:52-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Global Public Square

by Os Guinness
240 pages, $12.80 from InterVarsity Press

Not every good idea needs a book to promote it.

Many of the best ideas are so simple and so self-evident that long explanations subtract more than they add. That’s not universally true, but it’s definitely true with the idea of freedom of religion.

The Global Public Square is the most recent entry in the Patheos Book Club. When Patheos offered me a review copy I recognized Os Guinness’ name but really didn’t know anything about him. His website describes him as “an author and social critic.” He was born in China where his parents were medical missionaries, was educated in England (including a doctorate from Oriel College, Oxford), and has written or edited thirty books. He describes himself as a Christian but at least in this book does not claim any denominational affiliation.

Let’s start with the good parts. Guinness begins with an important question:

How do we live with our deepest differences, especially when those differences are religious and ideological, and very especially when those differences concern matters of our common public life? In short, how do we create a global public square and make the world safer for diversity?

Guinness answers that question by turning to Roger Williams’ idea of “soul liberty” – the Christian idea that since every person is accountable to God, every person must have the liberty to worship God as he sees fit. Guinness expands “soul liberty” to “soul freedom”:

Soul freedom is the inviolable freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief that alone does justice to the dictates of our humanity. … it best expresses human dignity and agency; it promotes freedom and justice for all; it fosters healthy giving, caring, peaceful and stable societies; and it acts as a bulwark against the countless current abuses of power and the equally countless brutal oppressions of human dignity.

In support of this idea, religious, cultural and political leaders from a wide variety of religious backgrounds have crafted the Global Charter of Conscience, a document that “sets out a vision of freedom of thought, conscience and religion for people of all faiths and none, and calls for the cultivation of civility and the construction of a civil public square that maximizes freedom for everyone.”

Religious prejudice and violence is one of the banes of humankind. The interconnectedness of contemporary life makes religious apartheid impossible, as though it ever was anything more than an excuse for getting rid of “the other.” The Charter proposes that at the least, we be civil and tolerant toward one another, respecting the “soul freedom” of others and expecting they will do the same for us.

As a polytheist, this makes good sense to me. There are many gods and goddesses – the ones I worship may not call to you. And even if you and I both worship Cernunnos, the worship and practice he demands of me may be very different from what he demands from you. I need not copy your practices in order to respect them, nor should I.

The Global Charter of Conscience is self-evidently true to most of us in the modern West, and the FAQ page on the Charter website adds plenty of context and depth to the document. Together, they make the case that the Charter is a worthy document, even if its ultimate effectiveness is questionable.

But in attempting to build an even stronger case for the Charter through The Global Public Square, Guinness detracts from its simplicity with a litany of ain’t-it-awful stories from around the world. He lumps “totalitarian governments, liberal universities [and] the gatekeepers of our public squares” together into one malefic stew of freedom oppressors. Although he says “there is no question of moral equivalence” between, say, Islamic governments threatening converts from Islam with death and American atheists trying to prevent sectarian prayer in government meetings, he makes such groupings over and over again throughout the book.

Guinness has some good thoughts in the book. He understands that appeals to religious authority are meaningless in the public square:

To make a persuasive public case under the conditions of contemporary pluralism means that advocates of any public policy have to translate their case into terms that make sense to others.

And he understands “persuasion is not imposition” – something I wish the Pagans who expect Evangelical Christians to swear off proselytizing would learn.

But Guinness continually conflates progressive causes with religious prejudice. He believes the Affordable Care Act is religious discrimination because it does not permit employers to decide which health services will be covered for their employees. And he says “some of today’s gay and lesbian activists have morphed from being victims to being victimizers in politically correct uniform.”

Still, Guinness is no fundamentalist. He says “we have reached the dangerous point where certain Western liberals are busily undermining freedom of religion and belief, and certain Western conservatives are equally busy defending it in a way that does it no credit.” But The Global Public Square makes me think he’s longing for the good old days when mainline Protestants ran the show, Catholics and Jews played along, Evangelicals were irrelevant and everyone else kept their heads down.

The Global Charter of Conscience is a good idea, and Guinness correctly identifies what it needs to become a reality:

The moral suasion of a declaration … the legal implementation of the rights expressed in laws … ongoing education and transmission of the rights and responsibilities from one generation to the next.

Sadly, The Global Public Square provides moral suasion only to those who share Os Guinness’ mid-20th century mainline Protestant worldview.

Uncategorized

Christianity

Global Charter of Conscience

Os Guinness

politics

public square

Previous Post

August 22, 2013

Nine Things I Think

Next Post

August 27, 2013 Psssst – We’re Winning

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

The Lord is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed in ____.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fear Grief Spirit Pain