Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Social Security

Social Security

Last updated on: September 9, 2011 at 7:52 pm by John Beckett

Social Security 2011-09-09T19:52:00-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

While I try to stay informed, I do what I can to stick to the news and avoid political commentary – it just gets my blood pressure up. But every now and then something slips through my filters and raises said blood pressure to the point where I have to say something. This is one of those times.

I’ve had it with Rick Perry and Rush Limbaugh all the other right wing talking heads calling Social Security a “Ponzi scheme.” This is not a debate tactic. It is not a policy proposal. It is not political theory. It is a lie – a deliberate falsehood told with the intent to deceive and manipulate.

The intent is to associate Social Security – the most effective and, dare I say it, the most loved government program in the history of this country – with a white collar criminal who enriched himself by deceiving his clients. Nobody knows who Ponzi was, but everyone knows his disciple Bernie Madoff, who is justly rotting in jail.

Social Security has always been the “third rail” of politics – touch it and die. That’s a problem for politicians who are philosophically opposed to it. The human brain doesn’t work on logic, it works by association. Say “Social Security” and “Ponzi scheme” in the same sentence enough times and people will start to associate the two. That can finally make it possible for politicians to abandon the collective care of our elders without losing their elected offices.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

The facts aren’t in question. Social Security isn’t an investment scheme, legal or otherwise. It’s a public pension plan. It operates on the principle of collective responsibility – each generation pays for the retirement of today’s elders and its retirement will be paid for by tomorrow’s adults.

There are some aspects of the plan that invite confusion, especially by those who want to be confused. Those who pay more Social Security taxes while working will draw more benefits once retired, up to a point. That ceiling is used to justify a cap on Social Security taxes – no taxes are collected on income over $106,800 per year. And due to the increased payouts expected when the baby boomer generation retires, taxes were raised and supposedly placed in a “trust fund” to be drawn down in later years. But the facts remain – Social Security is a public pension program, not an investment plan.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

The idea of retirement is very new. In tribal societies, elders simply worked less as their capacities declined. Of course, in tribal societies, not a lot of people lived to be very old. Throughout most of civilization, families have cared for their parents and grandparents – thus the motivation for large families, to insure that someone could take care of you in your old age. But in almost no situations were people expected to take care of themselves up the the point of death.

Where there were no adult children to care for their elders, or when those adult children didn’t have the resources, it went badly for the elders. Even if we wanted to return to a “your children are your retirement plan” arrangement, modern Western society has destroyed the extended family. If there are no jobs where you live, you’re expected to move to where the jobs are. I’ve done that three times, moving from Tennessee to Indiana to Georgia to Texas. It’s hard to take care of your parents and grandparents when they’re half a country away.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

And so we’ve developed other arrangements for caring for our elders. I remember the HR presentation on retirement when I started my professional career in 1984. It said “financing retirement is a three-legged stool: employer pensions, Social Security, and personal savings.” Employer pensions are all but gone – small businesses never had them and corporations say they can’t afford them. This puts even more pressure on personal savings. Over the last 4-½ years the balance in my retirement account has gone up 3% (in total, not per year), even though I’m saving 12% of my pay and my employer is adding another 3%. My rate of return is negative. If I was nearing retirement I’d be seriously worried – as it is I’m just hoping the economy improves enough for it to start growing again before I get too much older.

At least I make enough that I can save – people in low-wage jobs need all they make and then some just to get by.

If you’re very frugal or very lucky – or if you’re rich to start with – you can finance your own retirement. The majority of us can’t.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

The opponents of Social Security feed people’s evolutionary selfishness and suspicion of others.

“Why should I have to pay for someone’s retirement when they weren’t responsible like I am?” This is the part of the lone wolf myth Perry et al are trying to popularize. Maybe they were irresponsible or maybe they had bad luck or maybe they never made enough to be able to save. As the current economy has shown, you can do all the right things and still end up screwed.

“Why should I have to pay for someone’s retirement when they don’t need Social Security?” This is the other side of the lone wolf myth. The fact is that very few people “don’t need” Social Security. Keeping them in the system reinforces the idea of collective responsibility and collective benefits.

“I could do better if I took the Social Security taxes and invested them on my own.” Maybe you could and maybe you couldn’t – see my own example above. More importantly, would you?

You pay hundreds if not thousands of dollars each year for car insurance – odds are you rarely collect on that. Is car insurance a scam? No, it’s the principle of shared risk – you pay a little now to eliminate the risk of having to pay a lot later.

“Social Security is unsustainable – we have to end it.” This is simply not true. Even if we did nothing, future benefits would still be roughly 75% of what’s been promised. That’s not good, but it’s hardly reason to blow up Social Security. With small tax increases and a reasonable increase in the retirement age, Social Security can be sustainable indefinitely.

This doesn’t mean there aren’t structural problems or that there are no instances of gaming the system or that Social Security can never be changed. But the bottom line is that for all its shortcomings, Social Security is the #1 reason why most elderly people in this country aren’t living in poverty.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

We need to rethink retirement.

In a society where people live longer, it’s reasonable to expect people to also work longer. But is it reasonable to have the same retirement age for construction workers and office workers? Is it reasonable to expect people to carry a full workload right up until they retire and then shift to idleness?

If there were more jobs suitable for older (and by “older” I mean 70, not 50) workers – part time, not physically demanding – then we’d need to pay fewer retirement benefits. We’d also stop throwing away valuable economic and societal resources – an extravagance we won’t be able to afford once the impact of lower birth rates hits.

In the end, though, this is not an economic or a political issue. It’s a moral issue. It’s a religious issue. We cannot be a good, moral society if we don’t take care of our elders. If any politician (or anyone else) has a better idea on how to accomplish this goal – for everyone, not just those who work for the right companies and pick the right mutual funds – then I welcome it.

But stop attempting to associate our current social contract with a criminal scam.

Caring for our elders is the collective responsibility of society, not an individual responsibility.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 8, 2011

Spiritual But Not Religious, Again

Next Post

September 12, 2011 Together in Faith

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king of Babylon saw the handwriting on the wall?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cyrus Belshazzar Darius Nebuchadnezzar