Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

johnbeckett

A Contrast in Values

Last updated on: June 16, 2011 at 6:59 pm   by John Beckett

A Contrast in Values 2011-06-16T18:59:00-06:00 John Beckett

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I could not ask for a better contrast to yesterday’s post on Pagan values than this tweet from Southern Baptist leader Rev. Al Mohler:

“Dear Congressman Weiner: There is no effective ‘treatment’ for sin. Only atonement, found only in Jesus Christ.”

Pagan values flow from our experiences of Nature, of the gods and goddesses, and of life itself. Mohler’s values flow from a literal interpretation of the Bible. That interpretation might have been understandable even a few hundred years ago, but in the era of Galileo, Newton and Darwin, it requires willful denial of demonstrable facts.

Where Pagans see multiplicity Mohler sees singularity: one god, one religion, one way of life. Where Pagans see freedom, Mohler sees one set of permissible choices. Where Pagans see respect for other gods and their followers, Mohler sees at best pity and at worst a call for aggressive proselytization.

Where Pagans see unity Mohler sees separation: the “saved” who know God and the “unsaved” who do not and who will be eternally separated from God.

I read Rev. Mohler’s blog for insight into fundamentalism. I like to see how someone who is obviously intelligent and well-educated can hold fast to beliefs I could not accept once I began to study them. Normally, Mohler simply states what he believes and doesn’t get into personal attacks. While this tweet wasn’t exactly a personal attack, it is arrogant, rude and potentially harmful.

I haven’t said anything about Anthony Weiner yet. The sexual antics of politicians amuse me, but for the most part I don’t find them comment-worthy. I make an exception for hypocrisy: people like Newt Gingrich who preach “family values” for others while behaving quite differently themselves.

Let me be clear – what Rep. Weiner did was both wrong and stupid. But he didn’t do it because he’s tainted with “original sin” due to Adam and Eve’s rule-breaking. He did it because he – and all of us – has genetic “memories” of a long-gone pre-human society where an alpha male was allowed to mate with any female who would have him. At some point in our evolutionary process, human society changed and couples mated for life. This arrangement has proved to be beneficial for both individuals and for society – it’s one of the reasons why civilization became possible. But millions of years of evolutionary urges to mate with as many females as possible didn’t go away overnight. Dealing with these and other urges is one of the primary purposes of religion, philosophy and ethics.

Weiner’s sexting is wrong because it breaks a promise he made to his wife. It is stupid because it’s behavior more typical of immature teenagers, and because (like Bill Clinton’s escapades) it’s keeping him from the serious work of governing with which the people entrusted him. There is a movement – especially strong in the House, where Weiner serves – to radically remake America, to do away with our social contract and return us to a Wild West society. We need Weiner working for us, not obsessed with porn stars and not leaving his seat open because he can’t do his job any more.

Mohler’s suggestion that Weiner, a Jew, can only be healed through Jesus is arrogant and rude. It is arrogant because Mohler assumes his way is the only way. Even if he truly believes that, it is still rude to proselytize so bluntly and so personally to someone of another faith. Weiner is far more likely to be healed by drawing on a heritage with which he has a strong connection than by converting to a new and unfamiliar tradition.

And his suggestion that a physical and emotional problem with strong roots in evolutionary biology and psychology can be solved by “atonement” is dangerous. Like many fundamentalists, Mohler has a low regard for psychology and therapy. I’ve seen other ministers make similar recommendations with tragic results.

As a devoted practitioner of magic, I realize I live in a glass house. I have no doubt religious cures can be effective – I have seen them and I have experienced them. But I would no more tell a person with a sex addiction to work a spell and say a prayer and do nothing else than I would tell a cancer patient to do chants and visualizations and skip the medical treatments. Do both!

Rev. Mohler, I respect your beliefs even though I do not share them. And though it is difficult, I respect the obligation you feel to preach your exclusivist theology. But this tweet was arrogant, rude, and potentially harmful. You claim it was intended for a Christian audience, but it was addressed to Rep. Weiner and it was posted in public. Do not imply that you are a victim of those who don’t understand your flavor of Christianity. It is not your beliefs that are offensive – it is your method of expressing them.

But thank you for providing an excellent contrast of values.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 15, 2011

Pagan Values

Next Post



June 19, 2011 Egyptian Summer Solstice 2011


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Community CUUPS Druidry Foundations and Context Gods and Goddesses Magic Myth Nature Ritual Spiritual Practice Theology Travel Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: John's Gospel identifies Jesus as 'the Lamb of God' in the first chapter.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from John Beckett

Family

The Vampire Films of Jean Rollin

John Beckett

Family

I Think I’ve Been Hexed

John Beckett

Family

The Fear of Witchcraft

John Beckett

Family

Bo French Doesn’t Understand Texas

John Beckett

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Pagan

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

The Brazilian Remake of Kendricks' 'Flywheel' Opens in...

“Flywheel,” the story that launched the Kendrick Brothers’ filmmaking career is getting...

The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)

Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

view all Pagan blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube