Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Joel J. Miller

What Barton and Copeland get wrong about war and faith

Last updated on: January 11, 2014 at 9:20 pm   by Joel J. Miller

What Barton and Copeland get wrong about war and faith 2014-01-11T21:20:18-06:00 Joel J. Miller

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In this video Kenneth Copeland and David Barton argue that soldiers returning from war should not suffer PTSD or self-condemnation because of their experiences. I know they mean well, but their treatment of the scripture is baffling.

“Look how many people in Hebrews 11 faith hall of fame are warriors,” says Barton.

“Almost the whole list, man,” says Copeland.

“The whole thing,” affirms Barton.

But, no, not actually. Here are the individuals listed in Hebrews 11:

Abel, not a warrior. Enoch, not a warrior. Noah, not a warrior. Abraham, only went to battle when pushed by his nephew’s capture. Sarah, not a warrior. Isaac, not a warrior. Jacob, not a warrior. Joseph, not a warrior. Moses, a leader in war but not a warrior. Rahab, not a warrior. Gideon, warrior. Barak, warrior. Samson, warrior. Jephthah, warrior. David, warrior. Samuel, not a warrior, though he did hack a man to pieces.

By my count, that’s 11 non warriors (69%) and 5 warriors (31%). Even if we count Abraham, Moses, and Samuel as warriors, Copeland and Barton are still way off. Last I checked, half is nowhere near “the whole thing.”

And whatever the tally, we should be clear about this: War is not the point of Hebrews 11. Not only are few actual warriors listed, but none are primarily lauded for their war making. The author says that he doesn’t have time to get into their exploits. In fact, war is only explicitly mentioned twice, once in reference to the battle of Jericho, which is mainly notable because the city’s walls were brought down by non-military action.

Regardless, in Barton’s reading Hebrews 11 somehow validates soldiers’ behavior in war. “Not only are you guiltless, you are esteemed and venerated,” he says. “And you need to get that vision of yourself.”

There’s every possibility that a solider could be guiltless, esteemed, and venerated. There are plenty of Orthodox saints who were soldiers. And we venerate them on a level that would surely unnerve Barton and Copeland. But like Hebrews 11, we venerate them for their faith — not bloodshed.

The point of Hebrews 11 is to show the centrality of faith in the church, among the people of God. It’s not about justifying military action, however right it might be in some circumstances.

The video above offers a good (if extreme) picture of what I talked about yesterday; we assume that since we agree with the Bible, the Bible must agree with us. We then see evidence for that agreement even when it’s not there.

Theology

David Barton

faith

hermeneutics

Kenneth Copeland

military

reading the Bible

Previous Post



January 10, 2014

George Orwell and bending the Bible for our own purposes

Next Post



January 13, 2014 What we can learn from Nikolai the Serb


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Church Life Family Life Misc Prayer Quotes Society Spiritual Growth Theology Uncategorized Video

Select a Month April 2014 March 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 November 2008 October 2008 July 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 August 2007 June 2007 October 2002 July 2002 November 1999 October 1999


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Abraham" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Father of many Strong leader Shelter Blessed man

Related posts from Joel J. Miller

Evangelical

Is the Resurrection essential to Christian belief?

Joel J. Miller

Evangelical

How internet porn explains the decline of American...

Joel J. Miller

Evangelical

George Orwell and bending the Bible for our...

Joel J. Miller

Evangelical

Read the Bible if you're going to have...

Joel J. Miller

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube