Paul and Theosis

Last updated on: December 23, 2019 at 12:27 am by Scot McKnight

Paul and Theosis 2019-12-21T09:46:18-06:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When Michael Gorman’s Inhabiting the Cruciform God appeared I read it and even assigned it for a class at Northern and it was there that I began tracking more closely the rather fresh use of “theosis” as a NT category for what is sometimes called “union” with Christ or “participation” in Christ.

An Orthodox friend of mine had put me in touch in previous years with the Orthodox theory of theosis, which I found stimulating even if quite strange to my Western ears-way of thinking, so when Gorman used it I began to probe if it was really the same. No and yet some Yes, is what I thought.

Not long ago I read Grant Macaskill’s attempt to dislodge theosis from Pauline theology in his book, Union with Christ in the New Testament, which I found complicating the issue (which can be good) but disappointing (in not really taking us deeper into the conversation, and his forming it all through “covenant” is a parallel, not penetrating, idea) — yes, he made some good points about the history of the term. His more recent smaller book of lectures didn’t do much for the discussion. Yes, the notions of union and participation are probably more organic to NT categories but they are on the way to theosis and there are some elements of theosis that perhaps can clarify the discussion.

In Gorman’s newest book he takes us further into this discussion about theosis: Participating in Christ: Explorations in Paul’s Theology and Spirituality (#ad).

A quick brief of his on what he is talking about.

Because justification is transformative participation in the life of the God who is revealed in Christ, justification itself entails what the Christian tradition has called theosis, or deification.

Elsewhere I have defined “theosis” in the Pauline context as “transformative participation in the kenotic, cruciform character of God through Spirit-enabled conformity to the incarnate, crucified, and resurrected/glorified Christ.”

I’d put it this way: not quite theosis, of course, but moving in that direction. This very notion of union with Christ, being “in Christ” and “participation in Christ” along with the our indwelling the one who is the fullness of God — well, we’re getting there. Gorman makes four big points:

Because this God is revealed in a Messiah who was crucified before being glorified, it is cruciform theosis.

At the same time (as we emphasized in chap. 3), such cruciform participation in Christ is suffused with the life of the resurrected/glorified Christ, which makes it life-giving; this cruciform theosis is, paradoxically, resurrectional. Indeed, otherwise it would not be theosis.

We must also stress that for Paul theosis is a communal or corporate reality, not merely an individual experience;2 in 2 Corinthians 5:21 Paul says that God acted “so that we would become” God’s righ4.

Finally, realizing this corporate, cruciform, resurrectional theosis constitutes the goal of Paul’s mission because he believes it is the mission of God. In sum, theosis in Paul is corporate, cruciform, resurrectional, and missional.

After mentioning Macaskill and not engaging him much, Gorman sets out three ground rules:

First of all, no interpretation of theosis can compromise the Creator-creature distinction.

Second, a text that is theotic will identify, implicitly or explicitly, either one or more divine attributes or else a general divine likeness that is the goal of transformation.

Third, since the New Testament is inherently Christocentric (concerned with the identity and significance of Jesus), there normally needs to be a christological assumption in a potentially theotic text (or its co-text), whether explicit or implicit, that Christ participates in the divine identity.

Gorman is a NT exegete so he focuses on NT texts: 2 Cor 3:18 and 5:21 and then the grace of God in Christ that becomes the grace of of God in us in 2 Cor 8:9.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 23, 2019

St Francis: A Kidnapping and a Creche

Next Post

December 23, 2019 Millennials Not Coming Back?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who opened the first seal to release the White Horse in Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John The 24 Elders An angel The Lamb (Jesus)