Book of Revelation: Future, Timeless, or Past?

Last updated on: August 27, 2018 at 4:11 am by Scot McKnight

Book of Revelation: Future, Timeless, or Past? 2018-08-25T10:57:02-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Does the Book of Revelation refer to yet future events? Does it use images that are most/entirely timeless? Or does the Book of Revelation have visions that are/were then already past events? We can leave open, of course, a variety of mixing affirmative answers to each of the questions.

How the church has read Revelation is the focus of Craig Koester, Revelation and the End of All Things, chapter one.

Take the millennium in Revelation 20.

Rev. 20:1   Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the bottomless pit and a great chain. 2 He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, 3 and threw him into the pit, and locked and sealed it over him, so that he would deceive the nations no more, until the thousand years were ended. After that he must be let out for a little while.

Rev. 20:4   Then I saw thrones, and those seated on them were given authority to judge. I also saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony to Jesus and for the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. Over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him a thousand years.

Rev. 20:7   When the thousand years are ended, Satan will be released from his prison …

Many have read this as yet to come. Koester mentions Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, who anchored such beliefs in scripture, in creation, and in justice. Montanus along with Priscilla and Maximilla took this millennialism and argued — as thousands have done since their day — that future was imminent. Moderate like Justin and Irenaeus, Victorinus wrote the first commentary on Revelation in which he saw Nero and Rome. He also said Revelation is not a step by step plan into the future but a repetitive cyclical type of book.

Jerome edited Victorinus and argued against his view by saying the book was about timeless truth. He was not the first to do so. The battles are spiritual, the victories are spiritual. Tyconius argued in the 4th Century that the 1000 years was the church age. Thus Revelation 20:2 parallels Matthew 12:29 when Christ bound the evil one. Augustine adopted Tyconius’s view. The millennium then is a way of talking about time as a totality.

Koester turns toward explicit identification of images/names/figures in Revelation with specific people — some in the past, some recently in the past, some on the world’s stage at the moment. He canvasses Joachim of Fiore and radical Franciscans, Martin Luther (who was against it, then used it to identify people, then generalized it to more about encouraging faith and endurance), and then leaps into the church tradition where Revelation was either more premillennial (millennium comes after tribulation) or postmillennial (progressive improvement leading to millennium, e.g., Jonathan Edwards and Charles Finney).

Next he turns to charismatic individuals with distinctive interpretations of Revelation attract a large group: William Miller (7th Day Adventists), Charles Taze Russell (Jehovah’s Witnesses), and David Koresh (Branch Davidians).

Then to the Pre Mill Pre Tribbers in dispensationalism and their distinctive emphasis on the Rapture. Starting with JN Darby then to CI Scofield (of Scofield Bible), Hal Lindsay, and now Jerry Jenkins and Tim LaHaye. Big here is a distinction between Israel and the church and the use of Daniel 9:20-27’s 70 Weeks. (There are at least 2000 years between Dan 9:26 and 9:27.)

Why is this view so attractive, besides its evocative-enviable capacity to adapt to every new major event in history?

So why do many people find this system appealing? One reason is that its ominous view of coming events corresponds to perceptions that the world is sliding into increasing violence and moral decay. Terrorist threats are relentless, and modern military technology has created a situation in which nuclear holocaust seems inevitable. In the face of these threats, however, the dispensationalist system assures its adherents that God is in control. Things may seem chaotic, but they are not. The faithful can be assured that God s purposes will be carried out. The teaching about the rapture also holds out the hope that those who come to faith now will escape from the earth before the horrors of the end-times are unleashed.

A second reason this system is appealing is that it gives the sense that people can anticipate how God s purposes will be carried out, step by step, by following the script that has been pieced together from various verses of Scripture. This aspect has encouraged popular attempts to use the system as a framework for interpreting world events. The formation of the modern state of Israel in 1948 and the Israeli capture of east Jerusalem in 1967 led many to believe that God was divinely protecting the Jewish nation, and that with each passing decade conditions are emerging in which the temple might be rebuilt on its ancient site, where the Dome of the Rock now stands. Russia’s political and military maneuvering and recurring conflict in the Middle East all find a place in the scenario.

Because this view is so popular and because lay folks easily express its views, Koester pauses to criticize this view:

First, the system has a mechanistic view of prophecy fulfillment that is foreign to Revelation. … Second, neither Daniel nor Revelation refers to the rapture. … Third, the sharp distinction between Israel and the church is not warranted. … Finally, the system confuses the literal and the symbolic.

Next week, the turn to a more historical view of reading Revelation.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 27, 2018

There's More Than One Verse in the Pro-Life Hymn

Next Post

August 28, 2018 Faithful Conclusions (RJS)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mary Peter John the Baptist Paul