Babel Fish Needed? (RJS)

Last updated on: August 9, 2018 at 2:25 pm by RJS

Babel Fish Needed? (RJS) 2018-08-09T14:25:59-05:00 RJS

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I recently received a copy of a new book courtesy of the author and publisher, Faith Across the Multiverse by Andy Walsh. This book is not your typical science and faith book, but it should prove an interesting read as we work through several of the main concepts Walsh introduces. This opening chapter (numbered 0 rather than 1) is titled The Power of Babel Fish using a concept from Douglas Adams “Hitchhiker” books. Translation is inevitable and essential. Our thinking is constrained, if not confined, by the language we use. Metaphors and analogies make important connections bringing understanding.

It is also true that the same word can be used in different communities or contexts to mean very different things. Walsh uses the word “vector” as an example, contrasting its use in physics, molecular biology, the mapping of infectious diseases, and computer science. Although there are often points of connection in the various uses (but not always) it is still necessary to translate the meaning from one field to another.

What does this have to do with science and faith? There are several points of connection. First, the Bible frequently uses examples from nature (‘science’) to illustrate the nature of God and his relationship with creation. These metaphors and analogies make a crucial connection for human comprehension. They help to translate God into a language we can understand.

Second, Walsh points out that God reveals himself through relationships with people so that all could come to know him (special revelation) as well as through his creation (general revelation). This is not a novel concept, but Walsh makes a specific connection with Christ as revelation. New concepts are hard to develop and communicate – but a new concept and new language was needed.

But going a layer deeper, we see that Jesus himself is the ultimate expression of both general and special revelation. He was part of the physical world and lived his life to illustrate concepts that would otherwise have been inconceivable, such as a king who washes the feet of his subjects, a prophet who teaches on his own authority, and a priest who sacrifices himself. He also came with specific teachings from God to share with his disciples, to explain those ideas he was illustrating with his life. For this reason he is described as the Word of God; he was the word we needed to add to our language to be able to talk about all these principles. (p. 7)

Third, natural theology. Natural theology has something of a bad reputation among scientists, even many Christian scientists. It is attached to the attempt to somehow prove the existence of God. There have been many missteps along the way. The proof of God from nature is connected in the minds of many to gaps only God can fill. But finding God in gaps rather than in the whole of creation is troublesome. As scientific understanding increases, the gaps decrease. Beyond this, however, we should expect to find God in the entirety of creation, in what is well understood as well as in the mysterious. Walsh doesn’t go into this much, but he does adopt the two books analogy, where God reveals himself in nature and in Scripture. If God is the author of both there should be indications of this authorship in both general and special revelation, just as the works of favorite composers or authors are recognizable. Dorothy Sayers reads like Dorothy Sayers. Douglas Adams like Douglas Adams, etc.

What does this mean for natural theology? Walsh elaborates:

Why shouldn’t it be the same with the physical world? … God collaborates with creation itself to realize the ultimate form of that creation. If this is true, then a close reading of the physical world should also shed light on God’s perspective. And if God is any good at his craft, then some consistent sense of his personality should be evident in both of his major works, motivating the work of natural theology.

Furthermore, we would expect that the more we learn and understand, the more these commonalities would be evident. The language, the metaphors, the mental tools we acquire from learning to talk about the physical world should be relevant to topics from scripture, perhaps even clarifying concepts whose nuances are challenging to describe because we don’t have the words. If, on the other hand, there is no common author, then modern scientific ideas should find no analogue in the Bible. As products solely of human thought at the time, the books of the Bible could scarcely contain notions for which their human authors lacked the mental framework to even contemplate. (p. 20)

It isn’t that the Bible contains modern science hidden in its pages. Nor are we searching for proof of God’s existence though God-sized holes in our explanations. Rather, natural theology (Walsh’s version) looks for evidence of authorship through conceptual framework. In this book he seeks to see how modern science can help us better make sense of the words written in Scripture. He will explore themes from mathematics, physics and computer science.

Walsh’s style is entertaining and easy to read – although his ideas are more complex than they seem on the surface. It will be interesting to see where he goes as he looks for connections and indications of God’s authorship in the physical world.

How do you understand natural theology?

Is Walsh’s approach different? Could it be useful?

If you wish to contact me directly, you may do so at rjs4mail[at]att.net.

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 9, 2018

Tattoos, Debt, and Virginity: What Does the Bible Actually Say to Women?

Next Post

August 9, 2018 It Takes a Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What disciple walked on water toward Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Peter Matthew James