Comparing Commentary Types

Last updated on: June 16, 2017 at 4:26 am by Scot McKnight

Comparing Commentary Types 2017-06-15T11:33:09-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By John Frye, The Commentary Niche

Pastors usually have commentaries of various types. The Story of God Bible Commentary series aims to fill a niche that seeks to understand and live particular texts within the greater Story of God that the Bible presents. Let’s consider three commentaries I possess on the Book of 1 Peter.

A Critical Commentary. I have a dated commentary (first edition 1946) by Edward Gordon Selwyn titled The First Epistle of St. Peter: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Essays. At the time I bought it, I’m sure that someone said, “Oh, John, you’ve got to get Selwyn on 1 Peter.” I have used it, but, frankly, it is laborious reading. Selwyn presents me with more classical Greek than I can ever appreciate or use. I meet the early Church Fathers as Selwyn makes numerous quotes, and there are references to non-canonical early church letters, e.g., 1 Clement. As a pastor, I machete my way through the dense scholarship in Selwyn’s work on the hunt for his “commentary” on the verses at hand for a sermon or teaching. “Thar’s gold in them thar hills,” I keep telling myself. And there is. Any pastor who wants the historical, patristic background for the views of 1 Peter 3:18-4:6, she must grab a strong cup of coffee and read Selwyn’s “Essay I- On 1 Peter iii:18- iv:6.” The Word Biblical Commentary series is a more current critical commentary series. I have James D. G. Dunn’s on Romans. Critical commentaries celebrate textual, exegetical minutia (and I don’t mean that pejoratively).

An Application Commentary. As I noted in the last post, I have Scot McKnight’s The NIV Application Commentary: 1 Peter. The niche of this commentary series is right in the title—application—at the far end from a critical commentary. The text, of course, is explained based on thoughtful evangelical scholarship but it moves to its goal in the section called “Contemporary Relevance.” The ancient text is commented on, followed by a section called “Bridging Contexts,” i.e., from the biblical world context to our world. Followed by application, i.e., relevance. I like this series because the scholars have insights into our culture and offer suggestions for relevance that I would not know or think of. It’s a handy series for preaching, hear me, as long as you credit the author from whom you get that amazing homiletical idea. So, what does Scot offer in terms of “contemporary relevance” for 1 Peter 3:18-22? Having determined that the text is about the vindication of Jesus and justice being established, Scot writes, “We must attempt to regain a belief in justice, but we must transfer our hope away from governmental officials to God, to his actions both in this world and especially in the next. … What I argue here is that I can cope more readily with this kind of limitation and chaos [a child abuser released back to the streets on a legal technicality] in society because I know that someday all will be rectified, the guilty will be fairly punished, and the innocent victims will be vindicated to enjoy the life that God wants for them” (220, Scot’s emphasis).

The Story of God Bible Commentary. To the commentary at hand: Dennis R. Edward’s The Story of God Bible Commentary: 1 Peter. Selwyn’s commentary is 517 pages of compact print and Edward’s is 240 pages of elbow room print. The niche, once again, is in the title “Story of God.” This commentary, also, is at the other end from a critical commentary because now we see the whole forest and not the veins in the leaves of individual trees. Scholarship is not sacrificed, but is used for a specific purpose, answering this question: How does this particular text in 1 Peter fit as puzzle piece, not only into the letter, but into the sweep of God’s redemptive story? Application is not forsaken, but emerges from the stories the author tells. I mentioned some of Edward’s stories in the last post. Edwards incorporates the pertinent scholarship behind his comments, offers the various views about specific issues and texts in the book of 1 Peter. To whom did Peter write? What are the prevailing views of 1 Peter 3:18-4:6? What about “baptism saves you”? What is the meaning of “Babylon” in 5:13? Yet, the niche is the Story of God. Edwards writes, “First Peter 3:18-22 is among the most confusing parts of the NT. …Therefore, to try to interpret this passage is a lesson in humility. …[M]y suggestion as a pastor is that we offer a modification of the harrowing-of-hell perspective: that Christ defeated death (1 Cor 15:55), dealt a blow to Satan (Rev 20:2), and also proclaimed victory to imprisoned fallen angels. We should also point out that Jesus made his proclamation upon his resurrection, helping people to move away from picturing Christ in hell but rather seeing him standing tall and victorious, risen from the dead” (166).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 16, 2017

The Bible is Central 12

Next Post

June 18, 2017 Keep, O Lord

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who had Samson's hair cut?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Medad Micah Delilah Jezebel