Inclusive Language in Your Bible

Last updated on: November 18, 2015 at 12:06 am by Scot McKnight

Inclusive Language in Your Bible 2015-11-14T15:54:16-06:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Revising language is inherent to revising our approach to the issues. So says John Stackhouse in Partners in Christ: A Conservative Case for Egalitarianism. This will entail inclusive language when appropriate in the Bible’s translations into English.

Language matters, and it matters immensely. It expresses and then shapes the world into which we speak.

John begins by observing what happened with mid 20th Century feminism and language, and the big point must not be missed: language carries codes, the codes can be come invisible, and the codes can be oppressive. This is true at the theoretical level, leaving open that not all agree with each language change. I (SMcK) think this has at times gone too far in the elite culture in the Western world, but that’s for another day and another set of conversations. Back to the Bible and inclusive language and how mid 20th Century feminists opened the door:

Likewise, mid-twentieth-century feminists successfully pressed for changes in standard English usage in at least two key respects. First, male terms, which had traditionally been used to refer both particularly to men and generally to all human beings, were restricted to the former usage only. “Man” was replaced by “humanity,” “his” by “his or hers,” and so on. Inclusive language is now required by all standard style guides as simply correct (= conventional) English. Second, the titles “Miss” and “Mrs.” were largely, if not universally, replaced by the single title “Ms.,” a pseudo-abbreviation (for it corresponded to no longer noun) that was simply meant as a female counterpart to “Mr.” No longer, that is, would a woman be characterized immediately by her marital status as if that were the most important thing to know about a woman on encountering her (136-137).

This, along with the inclusive translations like the NRSV, spawned the complementarian (or patriarchal) movement at the lead of John Piper and Wayne Grudem, not institutionalized in the Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. Stackhouse tells some of this story:

Most significant and widespread among Protestants was the criticism of the Revised Standard Version (rsv) when it was issued in the 1950s. Many Christians thought that this translation manifested an ominous theological agenda: a liberal agenda, in fact, that challenged the proper interpretation of such key doctrines as the virgin birth (so Is 7:14 and the translation “a young woman” instead of “a virgin”) and the atonement (so 1 Jn 2:2 and 4:10 and the milder word “expiation” substituted for the King James Versions “propitiation”). Other Christians, however, were not convinced that the RSV was unfaithful to the Greek and Hebrew texts, and so used it as a helpful alternative to the archaic—and therefore often more misleading—English expressions of the KJV (138).

Ironical that Piper and Grudem were perceived as progressives in favoring the RSV when many conservatives of that day saw it as as the progressive Bible. So when the NRSV came out with its inclusive language, most evangelicals happily remained oblivious to a liberalizing of the already liberal Bible! Except Piper and Grudem, who saw the signs of a feminist revolution. The battle became fixed on inclusive language: should it be “brothers” or “brothers and sisters”?

The whole thing took on colossal importance (for some) when the NIV came out with the TNIV (or the UK’s earlier version, NIVI) for it had inclusive language — the translation leader was complementarian Douglas J. Moo. (Another irony got folded into the former one.) Grudem has been a fierce critic of the NIV, preferring instead his ESV (a revision of the RSV).

Stackhouse observes that all translations have some infelicities; translation is always approximate; and gender language is notoriously difficult because culture shifts constantly. Small changes, he says, are relatively minor most of the time though some make too much of them. How big are these small changes? Stackhouse:

Enough to warrant blasting a new version with a shotgun and mailing it back to the publisher? Enough to sanction financial threats to a Bible society if they don’t cease producing the offending version? Enough to justify the dismissal of a seminary professor involved in the translation project a year before his retirement? Enough to keep a new translation out of the hands of people who would welcome it both for their own reading and for sharing the gospel with friends who might be very sensitive to gender questions? (All of these have happened during the course of this controversy.)

Conservative New Testament scholar D. A. Carson describes the disproportionate reaction of some critics as “Bible rage” (140).

Including slippery slope accusations that inclusive language will lead to goddess worship. All of this is simply wrong headed ideology and fearmongering … no goddess worship yet in any translation. We might just note here that the Gospel writers translated Jesus’ Aramaic and Hebrew words into Greek, often differently and surely at times more loosely than other times, and we’re fine with Jesus himself being translated.

The issue here is social and political agendas. Stackhouse: “the explicitly antifeminist patriarchalism so important to these critics” (141).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 17, 2015

Hillary Clinton and Educational Outcomes

Next Post

November 18, 2015 America, Listen Up!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first Judge of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samson Gideon Deborah Othniel