Pandering to the Populace

Last updated on: October 1, 2015 at 12:02 am by Scot McKnight

Pandering to the Populace 2015-09-27T14:59:35-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In this blog post “populace” refers to those who sit in the pews on Sundays and who pay the pastor’s salary and by “pandering” I mean that pastors and preachers teach a softer theology than either the Bible teaches or what that pastor believes but fears, if taught, he or she would get sacked.

No one who reads the Bible carefully can believe that final salvation occurs without transformation. One way pastors pander to the populace is by radically distinguishing between justification and sanctification, making it a two-step process — justification referring to the moment of being declared right along with its guarantee of salvation (without conditions, unconditional love, grace as pure gift) and sanctification referring to a life of progress (or not) that has nothing do with final salvation but with blessing in the here and now and (perhaps) degrees of reward in the final heaven.

David de Silva, however, says both terms are being misinterpreted and that final redemption, as Simon Gathercole has said, is at the same time a “vindication on the basis of an obedient life.” I’m referring to David de Silva, Transformation: The Heart of Paul’s Gospel (Lexham, 2014), 8 n 2. Here are the six arguments of de Silva contending that transformation is necessary for salvation (I reformat for clarity, from p. 10):

First, Paul speaks of our transformation as the goal of his preaching and of God’s intervention, not merely about our acquittal (whether initial, final, or both).

Second, such transformation is essential, because God will not show favoritism in the judgment.

Third, Paul clearly attaches conditions to our attaining God’s goal for us beyond settling upon a certain belief and making a certain confession, which has bearing on what “faith” means for Paul in such formulations as “justified by faith.”

Fourth, Paul talks about “justification” as the result of having been brought in line with God’s righteousness and as a future experience of being acquitted at the Last Judgment on the basis of a life lived as well as an accomplished event of being reconciled to God after our estrangement in sin. Any assessment of Paul’s gospel must accour- for the connection between initial and final justification.

Fifth, Paul also speaks of “salvation” as something we will enjoy or experience in the future, not merely as something already accomplished. Again, any assessment of Paul’s gospel has to take this whole range of usage into account.

Sixth and finally, God expects us not just to “receive” his gifts but to make the use of and response to his gifts that show an appropriate assessment of their value—in this case, a life for a life!

Now some support.

1. The goal of his preaching is transformation: Galatians 2:19-20; Philippians 3:8-11; Galatians 4:19; 2 Corinthians 3:18; Ephesians 4:22-24; 2 Corinthians 5:17 and Romans 8:28-29.

2. The necessity of transformation, which is Spirit-empowered and Spirit-directed. But he focuses on Romans 2:2-11, and it ends with this line: “For God shows no partiality.” The partiality is about God’s judgment of the works of all humans. The just Judge, God, judges justly.

3. Conditions beyond mere belief. Notice Romans 8:11-14 and Galatians 5:19-21 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 and Ephesians 5:5-6.

4. Justification — what is involved? de Silva thinks this term means more than forensic declaration and refers as well to conformity to God’s standards (a solid view when rooted in the Jewish evidence — on which see the important study by Benno Przybylski, Righteousness in Matthew and His World of Thought). de Silva argues dikaiosis means the result of a legal action while dikaiosyne refers to the ethical virtue (as in Matt 5:17-48). The verb dikaioo means to declare in a way that makes a person just/right. de Silva sees transformation right here.

Justification is, in the legal or forensic sense, the recognition by God before all at the Last Judgment that one has lived in line with God’s righteous standards (27).

In this de Silva does not minimize grace or God’s work in us but instead sees God’s work in us as the inevitable and necessary implication of justification, and in that term he nests sanctification. Sanctification does not mean perfection or sinlessness but it means a life of obedience. Thus,

The many passages from Paul that we have been exploring push us in the direction of a view of justification in which God brings into being within us the righteousness that Christ exhibited, changing us to become more like him, indeed inviting us to become vessels through which Christ’s righteousness continues to express itself in real, effective ways in the communities and world around us (33).

[In disagreement with NT Wright and using Wright’s image of the whole car reduced to the steering wheel, de Silva says:] I would suggest, however, that if we are to understand justification from Paul’s point of view it ought not to be likened to any part of the car itself. Wright would agree that justification has to do with something that happens now in Christ and happens eschatologically at the judgment. It would be truer to Paul’s thought to think of justification, then, as the destination toward which we are driving—or, better, toward which we are being chauffeured by the Spirit—the destination at which we would surely arrive if we just stopped grabbing the wheel ourselves, or, worse, jumping out of the car and making the Spirit take detours to try to find us again and coax us back into the vehicle (34).

5. Salvation as future, too. Clearly, salvation is past, present, and future. [Aspect theory has to nuance this in special ways, but the substance does not change.] Ephesians 2:8-9 and 1 Corinthians 1:18 and Romans 13:11-14 and Philippians 2:12-13.

6. Response is necessary. 2 Corinthians 5:15 and Galatians 2:19-20.

He concludes by reframing the questions:

When we ask, “What is necessary for me to be saved?” we are not asking the right question. We should be asking instead, “Since Jesus gave his life for me and brought me the gifts of a fresh start with God and the Spirit of God to dwell within me, what is it right for me to do for him in return?” Or, “Where can I reasonably draw the line between living for him and living to serve my own interests and desires, since he, in his generous kindness, did not draw such lines?” We move from a minimalist question to a maximalist question—which only seems fair if we really believe that God gave his all to provide us with a way out and a way back, rather than giving the minimum that was necessary (42).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 30, 2015

Heroin Traffic

Next Post

October 1, 2015 The Sweep of Scripture and The Kingdom of God (RJS)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who lay on his side for over a year as a prophetic sign?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Ezekiel Daniel Hosea