Marriage and Heaven (by David Opderbeck)

Last updated on: July 13, 2015 at 4:48 am by Scot McKnight

Marriage and Heaven (by David Opderbeck) 2015-07-09T16:50:05-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Marriage, Homosexuality, and Heaven
by David Opderbeck

I wonder if my personal feelings about the U.S. Supreme Court’s gay marriage case are common among Christians of my age and social location: ambivalence, uncertainty, discomfort, regret . . . .

Some of this is unsurprising, I suppose. As a lawyer, with a bent towards judicial restraint, I can’t fully endorse Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. I’m no expert on all the nuances of substantive due process, but I am, I confess, of the school of thought that Constitutional “penumbras, formed by emanations” too often lack the stability needed for the rule of law. (If you didn’t catch that reference, it’s to the 1965 case of Griswold v. Connecticut). As a citizen in a pluralistic democracy, with gay friends and colleagues, I have a hard time sussing out the role of government in the face of such a contentious question that hurts people whom I love. As a Christian, I’m disappointed, but not surprised, by the tone and content of much of our intramural and public discourse about the question.

Well, maybe in one way I am surprised: it seems odd to me that so many conservative evangelicals cast this issue in terms of “heaven” or “salvation.” This is evidenced, for example, in Kevin DeYoung’s “40 Questions for Christians Now Waiving Rainbow Flags,” which asks (Question 9), “[d]o you believe that passages like 1 Corinthians 6:9 and Revelation 21:8 teach that sexual immorality can keep you out of heaven?” The notion here seems to be that “getting into heaven” is based on keeping certain rules – that is, on works – and that certain kinds of sexual misconduct, particularly homosexual conduct, is one of the big deal breakers. For many conservative evangelicals, these texts seem to function as the hammer in this debate. This strikes me as exceedingly odd, since a hallmark of evangelicalism is the belief that salvation comes by faith alone, not by works. To suggest that “salvation comes by faith, not by works, unless you commit sin x, y, or z, in which case you’re out,” obviously doesn’t make sense.

Of course, even if we believe in salvation by faith alone, we have to grapple with texts like 1 Cor. 6:9. Those of us who aren’t personally gay tend to ignore the other vices in these passages, such as greed, idolatry, and even “the cowardly and all liars” (Rev. 21:8). Given Jesus’ teaching about the connection between lust and adultery, who among us can read the reference to “adulterers” and not shudder? Can anyone living a comfortable life in America, while much of the world suffers in poverty, not be pierced to the heart by John the Seer’s reference to “cowards” and “liars?” Who among us can read Paul’s broad, general reference to the “unrighteous ones” (adikoi) without falling to his knees with a forlorn cry for mercy?

I think Richard Hays sums up the sense of the 1 Corinthians passage well in his book The Moral Vision of the New Testament: “The rhetoric of this passage treats the readers as participants already in a new life. The statement that evildoers will not inherit God’s kingdom is set forward not as a threat to the Corinthian community but rather as an invitation to them to claim their own baptismal identity as a sanctified people under the lordship of Christ, no longer living under the power of sin.” (Hays, at p. 41.) In other words, the question in 1 Cor. 6:9 is not so much about “who qualifies for heaven” as “what does it mean to participate in the community called the Kingdom of God?” That emphasis is exceedingly clear in 1 Cor. 6:1-8, which is about disputes in the local congregation over money leading to lawsuits, and even in Rev. 21, which is about God’s final eschatological dwelling among the community of his people in the context of a call for perseverance in congregations that are presently experiencing persecution.

Martin Luther correctly said that every Christian is simil iustus et peccator — at the same time justified and a sinner. We might not opt for Luther’s stark contrast between “law” and “gospel,” but we should not, I think, understand the New Testament witness as a call to seek a future Heaven by keeping a temporal law. It is, rather, a call to start becoming now, by grace, a new kind of community that anticipates its eschatological dwelling with God. To be sure, how we live together now as sexual creatures is an essential part of that communal task. When we engage in licentious sexual practices that destroy this beloved community, we endanger the community and our own place within it. I think this means the Church ought to tread with great care over this ground, and in this sense I agree with DeYoung: there is a great deal at stake in how we instruct, exhort, encourage, and even discipline ourselves within the Church on issues relating to sexuality.

For many, including for me, this means the Church can’t simply equate gay marriage with the lifelong union of one man and one woman. As a side note, it also means, I think, that the Church can’t simply equate divorce and remarriage with a lifelong union between one man and one woman (recall Jesus’ warnings also about divorce, remarriage, and adultery) — which isn’t the same thing as saying all divorce and remarriage completely disqualifies a person from life in the Church.

So here is the uncomfortable place where I stand at the moment: even if you think there is some place for committed gay relationships in God’s economy, it shouldn’t be a matter of simply taking up the culture’s rainbow flag; and even if you think there is no place at all for any kind of gay relationships in God’s economy, it shouldn’t be about a law an individual must keep to get into Heaven. It should always be about the counter-cultural community God is forming us to become in Christ.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 13, 2015

Universalism and Our Subpar World? (by Jeff Cook)

Next Post

July 13, 2015 What Makes Pandas Tick?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the Christian principle about speaking words?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Speak with love and grace Never speak Always be silent Speak harshly