Saving Salvation from Bad Ideas

Last updated on: July 9, 2015 at 12:08 am by Scot McKnight

Saving Salvation from Bad Ideas 2015-07-08T10:58:42-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some are allergic to the term “salvation” because of how they were treated by it in their churches while others glory in the term because how they were treated by it in their churches. But here is one (almost) indisputable claim about salvation: most operate on one side of the term. That is, the spectrum runs from the spiritual notion of salvation (forgiveness, relation with God, eternal life with God) to the social notion of salvation (justice, healing, systemic evil vanquished). Very few hold them together: Jesus did and so too did the Evangelist Luke.

We are back to Justo Gonzalez, The Story Luke Tells: Luke’s Unique Witness to the Gospel, a recent offering by Eerdmans, and a book written so clearly it can be used in home Bible studies, Sunday School classes and classrooms — college and entry level seminary classes (I will be using in our NT 301 Jesus and the Gospels class this Fall at Northern Seminary).

Where to begin? Where the Bible does:

The main saving act of God in the Old Testament is the liberation from the yoke of Egypt, and it is to that liberation that many of the texts which speak of God as Savior refer (62).

Totally right: the archetypal saving event in the Bible is God the Savior saving the children of Israel from the clutches of Pharaoh and ushering them into the Sinai peninsula and then across the Jordan into the Promised Land. Salvation for them, what did it mean?

In the Old Testament, therefore, salvation is the action of God and of God’s servants in freeing Israel from slavery and subjection to the Egyptians, Philistines, Syrians, Babylonians, and all the threatening neighboring nations. Salvation is also the divine action protecting Israel in the field of battle, giving it victory over its enemies (62).

Right again. But there is another sense of salvation in the Old Testament, the notion of redemption, or buying back what is rightfully due to one. Thus,

When the prophet Isaiah says that “your Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel” (Isa. 41:14), this means that Israel properly belongs to God, and that therefore in delivering the people from the yoke of Egyptians, Babylonians, and others, God is simply reclaiming what is God’s possession (63).

With this in the background of the early Christians, the term “salvation” had senses that are largely ignored by those on the spiritual end of the spectrum though at times the other end too ignores the spiritual. But the term “salvation” in the Bible has a strong sense, especially in the Gospels, of healing and health and physical restoration. Hence,

Taking all this into account as we examine first the Gospel of Luke and then the book of Acts, we shall see that when in these books we find the word salvation, it refers not only to what we today understand as “salvation” [spiritual], but may also refer to the restoration of health, to liberation from an enemy or a threat, and to the reclaiming of what properly belongs to God (64).

Which leads Gonzalez to a wonderful set of observations on the famous shepherds at the birth of Jesus scene in Luke 2.

‘Do not be afraid; for see — I am bringing you good news of great joy for all the people: to you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is the Messiah, the Lord’ (Luke 2:10-11). Today we know that this reference to a savior has eternal dimensions [again, the spiritual end of the spectrum], that Luke is referring to an eternal salvation. But for those shepherds, mention of such a savior would immediately have reminded them of the other saviors of whom the Bible spoke: Moses, Joshua, Samson [in other words, especially the socio-political spectrum end] (65).

So, then, what about the famous statement in Acts 4:12 (italics and bold below)? In context, beginning at 4:8 we see that 4:12 might just have a full-orbed sense of salvation in mind far more than most say when they use this text (to emphasize salvation exclusively in Christ):

Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them: “Rulers and elders of the people! If we are being called to account today for an act of kindness shown to a man who was lame and are being asked how he was healed, then know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed. Jesus is “ ‘the stone you builders rejected, which has become the cornerstone.’

Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.”

Gonzalez offers this possible re-balancing translation to show the context: “there is healing in no one else…” (70).

This leads him to see all healing as the work of Jesus in the world through the power of the Spirit:

There is no health, no well-being, no truth, no existence that is not a gift of this Jesus, apart from whom there is neither salvation nor health (71).

Biblical salvation is an integral salvation. It is a matter that has to do not only with liberation from the power of death, but also with liberation from every oppressive power (73).

On p. 74, then, Gonzalez looks more directly at the church today with four observations:

Those Christians today who emphasize the healing power of God are making an important contribution to the discovery of Luke’ theology as well as of the biblical vision of an integral salvation.

But it does mean that while we proclaim the message of salvation in the sense of eternal life, we also have to proclaim the same message in the sense of liberation from every power of evil.

The truth is that purely material help is incomplete, and that a purely spiritual gospel is also incomplete.

If it is true that there is health in no other name than that of Jesus Christ, then all health is Christian, and therefore all health is part of the mission of the church. 74-75

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 8, 2015

America's Tiny House Movement

Next Post

July 9, 2015 In the Image of God (RJS)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which branch of Christianity believes in the doctrine of transubstantiation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Evangelicals Catholics Orthodox Protestants