Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Jesus Creed

Home
Evangelical
Creation – Once or Continual? (RJS)

Creation – Once or Continual? (RJS)

Last updated on: June 9, 2015 at 6:21 am by RJS

Creation – Once or Continual? (RJS) 2015-06-09T06:21:31-05:00 RJS

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The next chapter of Mark Harris’s new book The Nature of Creation looks at the theological significance of the relationship between creation and creator. In particular he considers two aspects of the creative activity – creation from nothing and continuous creation – and what these tell us about the nature of God. Harris also looks at the coherence between modern science and these two aspects of God’s creative activity.

Creation from Nothing or creatio ex nihilo is a Christian doctrine of long standing. The theological significance is important: God is neither dependent on the world nor necessarily a part of it, with the corollary that the world is necessarily dependent on God for its existence. This is a cornerstone in a theistic understanding of God.

God both created the world at the beginning of time ex nihilo, and continues to support and uphold (or sustain) it, and is active in it. Since the world was dependent upon God for its existence in the first place (“In the beginning”), it continues to be dependent upon God for its continues existence; it is contingent in the widest possible sense. In fact, if God is said not to sustain the world in every moment of its existence, then this suggests that the world exists by means of its own power and is in a sense equal to God. The theological position of creatio ex nihilo is therefore not only relevant for how things began, but for how they continue to be. In short, creatio ex nihilo is not an explanation of “In the beginning” so much as a statement that there is an ongoing relationship between the created world and its Creator. (p. 112)

God’s transcendence is connected to the concept of creation from nothing. While God is not (necessarily) outside of time and space, God is not constrained by time and space. God is omnipresent and it is God who prevents a fall back into nothingness.

This is distinct from the claim of deism which attributes the initiation of the universe to a divine action but then essentially removes God from the picture, relegating his activity (if any) to a purely spiritual realm. Harris is emphatic on this distinction because we, raised in an era of scientific exploration and explanation, are quick to separate natural and supernatural as though God was responsible for one and not the other, and then to explain away or deny supernatural action. This is not the orthodox, theistic, understanding of God’s action.

Continuous Creation or creatio continua is related to the idea that God is not only transcendent, but also immanent. God supports, sustains, and preserves the world and is also active in an ongoing creative sense.

Rather, creatio continua suggests that the creative work is constantly ongoing in order to reveal the world’s full potential, which is perpetually novel and fresh. … God’s immanence is seen in the creative work of the Holy Spirit (e.g. Ps 104:30). (p. 116)

These to aspects of God’s creative activity are not mutually exclusive and both are required in some sense to understand both the present world and the world to come (new creation).

Science and Creation. Now it is tempting to equate the Big Bang with creatio ex nihilo and cosmological and biological evolution with creatio continua, and this is not entirely wrong. Nor is it entirely correct. The Big Bang isn’t quite creation from nothing. At the very least there are laws of physics describing the quantum fluctuation that resulted in the emergence of our universe. There could also be many universes (multiverse), or a prior universe from which ours arose. While Harris (and I) would hold that evolution (both cosmological and biological) is a manifestation of creatio continua, it is important not to limit God’s creative action in the world to this alone. God is active in a far broader sphere, including ordinary life and human history. It is also important that we not classify creatio ex nihilo as “supernatural” and creatio continua as “natural,” placing one within the realm of scientific study and the other outside this realm.

Both categories then, ex nihilo and continua, are fundamentally theological at the end of the day: they both describe God’s creative work, one as immanent and the other as transcendent. … The two categories complement each other, describing how God is both present in creation and transcendent with respect to it. And it hardly needs saying that this is the traditional solution known as theism. (p. 120)

Scripture and Creation. Both creatio ex nihilo and creatio continua find support in the Bible, although neither can be simply proof-texted from scripture. According to Harris (and others) the Bible makes no clear statement of creation from nothing. It does make rather clear statements about God as transcendent over creation. Genesis 1:1-2 is often cited, but this isn’t an unambiguous translation:

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. (NIV)

In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters. (NRSV)

The NIV translation is possible, but so is the NRSV. It is not wise to put too much weight on the passage as a defense of creatio ex nihilo. In the NRSV translation the sense is that God is forming something out of chaos, introducing order and function. The same is true in the NIV translation – except that here God first creates the chaos. Harris finds the NRSV more likely because it doesn’t seem likely that the author would have intended to make God responsible for the chaos of “formless and void” (tohu wabohu).

There might be no unambiguous statement which says that before creation existed there was nothing but God, but there are many which are compatible with the idea which stands behind creatio ex nihilo, that God is utterly transcendent. After all, the biblical creation motif unfailingly sees God as the root and basis for all that exists and continues to exist, which is what “from nothing” means. We also see – on almost ever page of the Bible – the corollary of God’s transcendence: the idea that creation, and especially God’s people, are utterly dependent upon God, (p. 122)

An apparent proof-text for creatio continua doesn’t immediately leap to mind the way Genesis 1:1 does for creatio ex nihilo. However, many passages speak to God’s divine action. Harris points to Job 38-41 and Psalm 104 as possibles, and to Psalm 139 among others. These are passages that speak to God’s immanence and involvement in the ongoing processes of the world. The outpouring of the Holy Spirit and God’s role in preparing the way for new creation are important examples from the New Testament. God isn’t simply letting the world move on a deterministic path to obliteration or perfection. There is uncertainty and all is contingent on God.

Creation isn’t just a one time act. God as Creator is an ongoing truth – transcendent and immanent.

Where or how does the Bible teach creation from nothing?

Is continuous creation also taught in the Bible?

What might this mean for the way we think about the relationship between science and Christian faith?

The pictures in this post, by the way, are of God’s wondrous creation along the Banias or Hermon stream just below the ancient city of Caesarea Philippi (Mark 8:27; Matt. 16:13) about 25 miles north of the Sea of Galilee (Lake Kinneret). This stream joins the Dan which also originates at the base of Mount Hermon and is one of the four streams that form the headwaters of the Jordan River. It was a marvelous hike with wild figs, long grasses, woodland, and rushing water.

If you wish to contact me, you may do so at rjs4mail[at]att.net.

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 9, 2015

Formalized Friendships

Next Post

June 9, 2015 Good for PA!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was stoned to death for preaching about Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Peter James Stephen