Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Jesus Creed

Home
Evangelical
You Are Your Brother’s Keeper (RJS)

You Are Your Brother’s Keeper (RJS)

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 10:07 pm by RJS

You Are Your Brother’s Keeper (RJS) 2015-03-13T22:07:22-05:00 RJS

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’ve been slowly working through Iain Provan’s new book Seriously Dangerous Religion: What the Old Testament Really Says and Why It Matters. The next chapter addresses the Old Testament’s answer to the question of how we are to relate to our fellow humans. Provan takes two major approaches to addressing this question. The first continues his general approach of starting with Genesis. The second looks at the sweep of the rest of scripture. Both are interesting and will be outlined here.

The fall of Cain. Provan takes Genesis 4 as the starting point for this discussion. There is meaning in the names of Cain and Abel and in the statement of Eve that created Cain with God. This is a literary masterpiece with a message for the ancient Near Eastern audience (and for us). Eve claims to have become a cocreator with God producing Cain whose very name “speaks of the human tendency toward self-divinization.” (p. 192)

The name Abel (Heb. hevel) speaks, in contrast, of the reality of a human being’s existence as mortal. Hevel means “breath” or “breeze” (e.g., Isaiah 57:13) and thereby refers to what is insubstantial or fleeting or to actions that are in vain or to no purpose—futile or pointless endeavors whose effects do not last. Everything to do with mortal existence is said in the Old Testament to be “ephemeral” or “fleeting” in this way. Representative is Psalm 39:5: “You have made my days a mere handbreadth; the span of my years is as nothing before you. Each man’s life is but a breath (hevel).” Where the name Cain speaks of grasping after divinity, then, the name Abel signifies the transient nature of human existence. (p. 192-193)

The tendency of Cain toward, if not self-divinization, at least a sense of arrogance toward God is seen in the incident of the rejected sacrifice. In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the Lord. (Gen 4:3) In contrast Abel brought fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. (Gen 4:4) Abel’s offering was accepted, but Cain’s was not. Provan suggests that there are two reasons for this – first because Abel brought the best, but Cain did not. The second is more important – Cain did not bring his best because his heart was not right. Cain brings an offering to get something from God and is angry that God didn’t fulfill his part of the bargain as Cain understood it. The story reflects a commentary on the typical ancient Middle Eastern attitude toward sacrifice.

These ancient peoples “expected their gods to show them favor in their various endeavors. They were therefore very interested in how to attain the favor of the gods.” As one ancient Babylonian text counsels its readers, “Every day worship your god. Sacrifice and benediction are the proper accompaniment of incense. . . . Offer him daily, and you will get your reward.” Sacrifice, in this way of thinking, is about giving in order to receive; it is nothing other than a form of bribery. (p. 194)

But biblical sacrifice is not about feeding and appeasing the gods As Provan puts it “God is interested in what is right” and ethical performance is more important than ritual importance. He comments on Isaiah 1:10-17 and quotes several other passages from the OT to back up this point.

I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings. (Hosea 6:6)

Even though you bring me burnt offerings and grain offerings, I will not accept them . . . but let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream. (Amos 5:22-24)

To do what is right and just is more acceptable to the Lord than sacrifice. (Proverbs 21:3)

Cain refuses to be reconciled with God and takes his anger and disappointment out on Abel. And this leads to the famous question when God confronts Cain. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

The question is never explicitly answered, because it does not need to be. From the perspective of biblical faith, the answer is obvious. Yes, if you have been created to work the garden and take care of it (literally to “keep” it, Heb. shamar; Genesis 2:15), you are certainly also to “keep” (shamar) your brother. Just as the good God “will keep you [shamar] from all harm—he will watch over [shamar] your life” (Psalm 121:7), so also a righteous image bearer of God will watch over the life of his fellow image bearer. That is the core of right relating to my various neighbors: to “keep” them. (p. 198-199)

Provan has more to say about the significance of the story of Cain and the message it conveys. This is worth discussion, but will have to wait for another post on the passage. That Cain, and all of us, are our brother’s and our sister’s keeper has great significance for the biblical faith.

Love your neighbor as yourself. Provan sees another message implicit in the story of Cain and Abel as well. God treats Cain generously despite his rebellion, as he also treated Adam and Eve generously despite their rebellion. So too should we “be generous to our neighbors even when they are our enemies and even when they live dark lives that breed further darkness.” (p. 205)

The first three of the ten commandments in Exodus 20 deal with the Israelites’ relationship with God. The fourth concerns the sabbath, but includes a command that it is a day of rest for all including servants, animals, and foreigners. There is the positive command to honor father and mother followed by five commandments that deal with the right way of relating to others … thou shalt not – murder, commit adultery, steal, give false testimony, covet.

The last of the commandments is the most fundamental (20:17); it concerns coveting (i.e., desiring or yearning for something belonging to someone else).

…

It is wrong desire, these texts suggest, that lies at the heart of a dysfunctional community—desire for the wrong gods and desire for the wrong things. We want things without regard for the other persons with whom we are in relationship, whether God or other human beings. (p. 207)

Although commandments in Exodus 20 are largely phrased as negative, the Old Testament provides positive statements throughout.

Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.

Leviticus 19:18 is an important verse, highlighted by Jesus along with the command from Deuteronomy 6:5 to Love God …All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments. Positive love involves caring for those who are weak, powerless, down and out; the widow, orphan, and stranger. The theme runs through much of the old testament, especially the prophets and the wisdom literature, with the definition of neighbor expanded beyond just “your people.” Proverbs 25:21-22 provides an example:

If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat; if he is thirsty, give him water to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head, and the Lord will reward you.

The burning coals are not revenge, nor is the reward for taking revenge by being merciful to heap burning coals on his head. Rather the burning coals are the result of the difference between right and wrong behavior and the reward is for doing what is right.

It is these two injunctions, then—to love God and neighbor—that lie at the heart of the Old Testament understanding of the right way to live in the world. These principles provide the framework within which more specific instructions like “do not steal” and “be generous” make sense. These are, in fact, the principles according to which all specific rules about how we should live are to be understood, as we shall see further in chapter 10. Behind and beneath all such rules are relational realities. I should relate rightly to God, acknowledging that God is God, entrusting myself to his goodness and seeking to love him, obey him, and pray to him; and I should relate rightly to my fellow human beings, seeking their good, “keeping” them, and avoiding covetousness and all the wrongs that arise from it. (p. 209-210)

Loving my neighbor, moreover, involves both negatives and positives. It involves refraining from such neighbor-harming activities as favoritism, cheating, oppressing my workers in pursuit of gain, failing to honor my parents, murdering, committing adultery, stealing, and providing false testimony. At the root of all such evil is covetousness, and from this too I must refrain. Positively, neighbor love involves taking stringent action, with God’s help, rightly to order my desires. Beyond that, it involves virtues like generosity and the deliberate cultivation of empathy, without which it is impossible even to conceive of how to love my neighbor as myself. (p. 212)

Provan goes on to explore the ways that the biblical faith, through its structure of society around the call to love your neighbor as yourself and to be your brother’s keeper is significantly different from most, if not all, other traditions. He disputes the argument that the Golden Rule or ethic of reciprocity is a global ethic found in many religions and philosophies. To claim such requires a reductionist strategy that ignores the fundamental differences in the various faiths.

Does the bible, especially the Old Testament teach that we are our brother’s or sister’s keeper?

If so, what does this mean and who is your brother/sister/neighbor?

If you wish to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail [at] att.net

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

Bible

Previous Post

December 9, 2014

The Original American Creation-Evolution Debate

Next Post

December 9, 2014 Why Are Women Leaving the Church?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group refers to their leaders as "General Superintendents"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nazarene Orthodox Methodist Catholic