Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Jesus Creed

Home
Evangelical
Loveology: A Review

Loveology: A Review

Last updated on: June 5, 2014 at 12:13 am by Scot McKnight

Loveology: A Review 2014-06-03T20:45:15-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This review is by a person who has thought about the topic and by a person to whom John Mark Comer has written his book, Loveology. The review is by former student, Kellie Carstensen, who led a student group that met in my office routinely to discuss relationships and love.

When Traditional Meets Trendy: John Mark Comer’s Loveology

John Mark Comer’s new book Loveology presents a remarkably comprehensive theology of love in the context of marriage, dating, and the male-female relationship. Starting with love and working backwards through marriage, sex, romance, and then the male-female dynamic, Comer contributes a youthful, pastoral voice to the conversation on Christian sexuality which is unique alongside his more conservative foundational beliefs.

The book’s format and design evoke a simplified aesthetic similar to a Rob Bell book where white space is prevalent and each chapter begins with a contrasting pink page using white ink. Comer’s writing style is boldly informal as it confronts the reader with direct questions, fragments sentences, and creates a more dramatic tone through choppy paragraphs that are easily readable for an audience oriented towards tweet-sized texts. These elements, in addition to the content itself, signify what is stated on the back cover: “this is a book for singles, engaged couples, and the newly married” who want to learn about a Christian interpretation of love and sexuality. Even so, for readers who have been married a long time this book provides a window into the conversation among younger Christians about sex and common questions raised by present culture.

Regardless of the reader or the trendy cover, there is an underlying argument in the book that has strong traditional roots. The book begins as a safe, typically affirmed discussion on Christian love based on the sacrifice of Christ, marriage that is a serious choice, and sex as healthy within the confines of marriage. In these areas Comer establishes his relatable, trustworthy character as he shares parts of his own personal story. None of it is likely to get people boiling. However, the final sections on “male and female” and “gay” reveal the more controversial elements of Comer’s beliefs about gender roles. To a younger audience these are the areas with the most gray areas, and thus they are the areas that Loveology has the hardest time successfully explaining (or convincing).

So what is love?

Loveology begins by calling for a redefinition of love in the midst of cultural romance myths and a declining respect for love as more than just a thing or an emotion that happens to us. Instead, Comer argues the core of love is defined by the sacrifice made by Jesus Christ on the cross and thus love is primarily about the active choice of self-giving for another (35). His argument is well grounded in Scripture and would be widely approved of by many Christians.

Along these lines, the section on marriage dispels the prevalent myth that the purpose of marriage is to make you happy. Instead, “happiness is the result of a healthy marriage” (75). Marriage by God’s design is a partnership of two people who can use it as a means to succeed in kingdom work for God.

In regards to sex, Loveology also cautions readers to remember the purpose of sex to fuel the intimate bond in marriage of two people becoming one. Sex is not just about the physical act itself, but instead the true purpose of the act reveals why it is destructive outside of marriage and life-giving inside of marriage. In the section on “Romance” Comer outlines four marks of a healthy relationship based on the Song of Songs. And similar to many Christian books on the subject, this is where the “line” becomes fuzzy.

It isn’t that simple

The challenge with any book on such a heated topic is finding a middle line between over simplifying love or over complicating it. Although Loveology is trying to walk this line, it often fails to do so without sounding contradictory. The temptation to simplify is understandable when speaking to a younger audience that wants easy answers. Yet, as with many aspects of Christian belief and practice, the answers are rarely simple.

Early on Comer states that “Love = Jesus on the cross. There you have it, in black-and-white” (33). This in itself is far from blasphemous, but the tension arises not long after when he writes “It’s that easy. And that difficult” (36). At this point the reader might already be confused. Is it black-and-white? Or does the difficulty acknowledge gray area? And gray areas are the primary arena for questions on the topics surrounding love and sexuality. These gray areas are where controversy breeds.

Here comes the controversy

Over-simplification rears its ugly head again in the section on male and female. Comer, in arguing for a framework of gender roles where the man is called to be the leader, states:

“It’s that simple. Controversial, divisive, incendiary, yes–but simple. The man was made to lead, and the woman to be his partner, right at his side.

But notice how vague the ‘roles’ are.” (183)

I applaud Comer for trying to balance the complexity of the issue, but anytime someone says “it’s that simple,” it usually isn’t simple at all. He acknowledges it in the next line by saying the roles are vague, but at this point we are again left mid-conflict between a supposedly simple thing and something that is also incredibly vague.

Comer’s beliefs on gender roles lean toward the complementarian perspective. Although this is widely accepted by many Christians, the younger audience that Comer is addressing will most likely find it somewhat alarming amidst a culture with growing respect for the feminist and egalitarian perspectives. At the end of the section he again secedes to the complexity of the issue by saying the “gender roles are more a trajectory than a list of do’s and don’ts” and he also admits that this position does not fit in with the forward-thinking, progressive culture of today because Christianity is supposed to transcend culture (185). Even so, Comer does not say much about the challenges of this trajectory or how to balance the complexities before it derails into unhealthy relations between men and women, which has often been the case throughout history.

Comer’s definition of “leading” is also contradicted in several spots. Initially he says Adam was called to lead, and “by ‘lead’ I mean ‘give your life away for the good of another’” (182). But then in the next chapter, he looks at Paul’s letter to the Ephesians and explains that the word “submit,” or hypotasso in Greek, “can be translated ‘respect’ or ‘yield’ or ‘defer’ or ‘put another’s good ahead of your own’” (189). If men are called to lead, or give their life away for the good of another, and women are called to submit, or put another’s good ahead of their own, how are those two things different? According to Comer they are separate, but the gray area is deep enough for a reader to get lost in.

To be clear, I am not saying that I either agree or disagree with Comer’s stance. As a millennial caught up in the gray areas of life in general, I am open to every point of view. However, as Christians we need to be aware of how frustrating it can be, to both believers and unbelievers, when an argument is over-simplified, then contradicted, and then acknowledged as vague, but then simplified again as “biblical truth.”

Remarkably, the section on “gay” embraces the nuances of gray areas better. Comer admits that this issue “isn’t about politics” to him, but rather “it’s about people” (213). Although he again settles on the more “traditional” side in his belief that God’s vision of marriage and sexuality is solely between a man and a woman (215), Comer also acknowledges the way that Christians have made this into a damaging and hurtful position in present society. By spending the bulk of the chapter dispelling myths about sexuality from both sides, Comer better engages the gray area between the two extremes while maintaining a scripturally-based defense for his position against homosexuality.

Still happily ever after

Although Comer struggles to walk the line between simplistic and complicated, Loveology as a whole is worth reading because of the way it comprehensively attends to the range of issues concerning love and sexuality. Most of the recent evangelical books on these topics have focused on one area of sex, marriage, or the relationship between genders. In comparison, Loveology successfully covers all of these areas in a thorough manner that engages with scripture as well as present culture. Comer contributes to the discussion as a youthful, pastoral figure who is still rooted in traditional Christian thought. Of course, this unique approach should not be read blindly or without caution. After all, the counter-cultural Christian knows love isn’t really blind, it is patient and kind while we work out the nuances of all that is gray.

Love and Marriage

Previous Post

June 4, 2014

Scrupulosity and Faith

Next Post

June 5, 2014 Adam Both Archetypal and Historical (RJS)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name of the second book in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leviticus Exodus Genesis Deuteronomy