Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Jesus Creed

Paul the Jew, But How Jewish?

Last updated on: March 10, 2014 at 5:20 am   by Scot McKnight

Paul the Jew, But How Jewish? 2014-03-09T17:30:29-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One of the more pressing questions among those who study Paul today is How Jewish he was. Which leads to the question, Did Paul observe Torah? Or, Would his fellow Jews have considered Paul a Jew? We can widen this somewhat: Did Paul expect Jewish believers to follow the Torah? Or did he expect them to go flexible on Torah observance? Did he expect Gentiles to observe those bits in the Torah that were for Gentiles, as seems the case in Acts 15:28-29?

N.T. Wright, in Paul and the Faithfulness of God, weighs in with his perspective-defining set of lines:

Contra the many “post-supersessionists” and contra the many obliteration-of-Israel approaches to Paul, NT Wright finds both continuity and discontinuity, all of it revised through Jesus as Messiah and the Spirit. By the time he’s done with this important section on Paul’s Jewish identity question, he sees a “third entity” — the church, the fulfillment of Israel in Jesus and the Spirit.

Would Paul’s Jewish contemporaries have considered him a ‘Jew’? This is not just about things that he believed. Many Jews no doubt believed many strange things, including the identification of strange people as ‘Messiahs’. But Jews then as now have seldom made niceties of ‘belief’ the main criterion. The question would have been, what was he doing, or perhaps not doing? Paul admitted people to Abraham’s family without requiring the covenant sign of circumcision. Paul spoke of the ‘temple’, referring not now to the shrine in Jerusalem but to the fellowship of Jesus-followers and even to individuals among them. Paul treated the Messiah-faith ‘family’ as an extended family, insisting on people ‘marrying within’ that family in the way he would previously have insisted on Jewish endogamy. Paul does not seem to have bothered about the sabbath, regard- ing it as something that Messiah-followers could observe or not as they chose. All this must have raised not only eyebrows but also hackles among the Jewish populations in the Diaspora.

Notoriously, Paul went further. He shared table fellowship with non-Jews who were Messiah-believers. If that caused problems even for Peter and Barnabas, as it seems to have done (we can hardly suppose that Paul invented the awkward ‘Antioch incident’ out of thin air), we can be sure that it would have caused serious problems for the young Saul of Tarsus. He advised the Messiah-people in Corinth to accept dinner invitations from anyone and everyone, and to eat unquestioningly what was provided, the only exception being if someone’s conscience was still ‘weak’ at the thought of eating idol-meat. Not only, then, did he advocate eating with uncircumcised and even with unbelieving Gentiles, but on an apparently straightforward reading of the relevant passages (we shall discuss them further in a moment) he advocated, in principle, eating their non-kosher food, on the scriptural grounds that ‘the earth and its fullness belong to the lord’. Since it is clear from the discussions in both 1 Corinthians 8—10 and Romans 14—15 that Paul considered himself emphatically among the ‘strong’ who were happy to see the world this way, as opposed to the ‘weak’ who still had scruples (to whom he none the less deferred where appropriate), it would appear not only that Paul was advising Gentile Christians in Corinth to eat non-kosher food but that he was happy to do so himself, and that he was happy to see other ‘Jewish Christians’ following this pattern. And at this point some today might say, as some of his contemporaries certainly did, that he had stopped being a ‘Jew’ altogether. He had abandoned the most basic markers of Jewish identity.

Above all, there is Galatians 2. Right after saying ‘We are Jews by birth, not “Gentile sinners”’, Paul proceeds with a radical but of redefinition: ‘But we know that a person is not declared “righteous” by works of the Jewish law, but through the faithfulness of Jesus the Messiah’. Then, in the most dramatic of redefinitions (in a passage we have studied many times already but which remains strangely absent from the discussions of those who want to claim that Paul remained a ‘Torah-observant’ Jew), he says, ‘Through the law I died to the law, so that I might live to God,’ explaining that this has come about through his co-crucifixion with the Messiah. How much clearer do things need to be? (1428-1430)

This is heavy stuff in the contemporary scholarly scene. Wright is not backing down.

1433: And the upshot of it all is that if one were to accuse Paul of no longer observing Torah, he would roundly declare that though he had come out from under the rule of Torah, ‘dying to it’ by being co-crucified with the Messiah, the spirit-driven life in the Messiah was in fact the true Torah-observance, the thing towards which Deuteronomy had been pointing all along. It led, not least, to the deep and heart-felt keeping of the Shema: one God, therefore one people of God.

A few pages later, from 1446:

A strong case can be made, following Sanders and others, for seeing Paul himself as advocating, if not the phrase ‘third race’ itself, nevertheless some- thing approaching it. Sechrest concludes ‘that Pauline theology constructs a change in religious belief and practice as a change in ethno-racial identity’. The evidence for this is scattered across several sections of the present book. It is already present when Paul speaks in Galatians 3 of Abraham’s single family, his ‘heirs’, marked out by Messiah-faith. A good deal of what we argued in chapter 10, and in the last section of chapter 11, is heading in this direction. But the notion comes into full view, quite sharply, in two or three key passages. The first is the one with which we closed the previous sub- section:

Jews look for signs, you see, and Greeks search for wisdom; but we announce the crucified Messiah, a scandal to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, Jews and Greeks alike, the Messiah – God’s power and God’s wisdom. God’s folly is wiser than humans, you see, and God’s weakness is stronger than humans.

This spectacular little passage compresses a great deal into epigrammatic form. Above all it emphasizes something often neglected in the relevant discussions: that the focus of Paul’s life and work is not a ‘system’, not a ‘religion’, not an attempt to forge a new social reality in and of itself, but a person: the crucified Messiah. All else is defined in relation to him. Any attempt to water down the ‘scandal’ that this posed for Jews, or the ‘folly’ that it presented to Greeks, is a large step away from Paul.

This opening statement in 1 Corinthians already means that those who belong to the Messiah are defined, are given an ‘identity’ if we must use the term, that is (a) rooted in Israel’s Messiah, and hence in that sense inalien- ably ‘Jewish’, but (b) redefined around the crucified and risen Messiah and hence in that sense inalienably ‘scandalous’ to Jews. Rooted and redefined: continuity and discontinuity. Those are the classic marks of Paul’s thought and life. And those are the ways in which he thought of the Messiah’s people. They remain Abraham’s family: ‘our fathers’, he says to the mostly gentile Corinthian Christians, came out of Egypt with Moses. The Corinthians used to be ‘Gentiles’ but are now no longer (12.2). But for Jews, like Paul, the rule is: ‘I am crucified with the Messiah’. Scandalous. A third entity.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 10, 2014

Touchy Spot: Evangelicals and the Church

Next Post



March 10, 2014 Electorate Shifts Left


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What instrument did David play?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Harp Lyre Trumpet Flute

Related posts from Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

The Gospel of With Us and Through Us

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Northern Seminary Announces: Nijay Gupta Joins Faculty

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

The Gundrys and Me: Ruth Tucker

Jesus Creed

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube