Christian Education and The Questions of Origins (RJS)

Last updated on: December 17, 2013 at 2:28 pm by RJS

Christian Education and The Questions of Origins (RJS) 2013-12-17T14:28:36-06:00 RJS

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Earlier this year Scot posted on several chapters in a new book Reading Genesis 1-2: An Evangelical Conversation. Today I’d like to consider another of the chapters in this book – Teaching Genesis 1 at a Christian College by Kenneth Turner. Dr. Turner received his Ph.D. in Old Testament from Southern Seminary and is currently a professor of biblical studies at Bryan College in Dayton Tennessee. I had the privilege to meet and speak with Dr. Turner and his colleague Brian Eisenback, a biology professor at Bryan, this last summer. Turner and Eisenback have a interest in and commitment to changing the way questions of origins are presented in Christian education, including in typical homeschooling curricula, they are working together to develop a curriculum that could be . They have a two part essay on the Biologos site outlining their interests, motivations, and approach: Christian Education and its Shortcomings: Why We Need a Fair and Balanced Approach to Origins.

Ken Turner’s essay in Reading Genesis 1-2 reflects on his experiences teaching at Bryan College, where a large percentage of the students were either home schooled or educated in Christian schools. The issues raised by Genesis 1 (not to mention 2, 3, 6-9, and 11, Job, Jonah, and more) can be daunting. The Old Testament Literature and Interpretation class is required for all Bryan students, and most often taught by Turner – providing a depth of experience that many will find helpful, including pastors and teachers in the local church. The questions raised in the local church, by high school students, college students, and adults, are not all that much different from those raised by the college students in Turner’s classes.

How should we deal with these issues in the local church?

Turner outlines an eightfold approach – meant to echo the structure of Genesis 1 where we find a prologue, three days of forming/separation, three days of filling/inhabiting and a final day of divine rest. His outline may give some guidance to anyone who wishes to introduce these topics in a local church setting, in adult Sunday School, with college students, or even high school students.

1. Prologue: In the Beginning … Biblical Authority. Here Turner finds it helpful to tell something of his personal story and to discuss inerrancy (which he affirms) and the notion of Biblical authority. In this context concepts like hermeneutics, genre, historical context, and authorial intent can be introduced. From my perspective, and as emphasized by John Walton and Tremper Longman as well as Turner, it isn’t a matter of conforming the text to “modern science” but of being faithful to the intended message of the text.

2. Let There Be Highlight: Distinguish Between the Who/Why and the How/When. “The heart of the creation story is theology proper; it is about God and his relationship to his creation. If we go to Gen 1 and do not come away to worship, something is wrong, something is missing.” (p. 191)

The discussion needs to start with the who (God) and the why of the text – the theological agenda of the author. Turner notes that Gen 1 “is a doxological narrative,” which reads with a certain cadence (even in English) that attracts the reader and invites reverence and wonder.” It also challenges ancient Near Eastern view of the world with many gods and divine struggles. Turner points out that Genesis provides a view of the creator “as nongendered vs ANE gods who are gendered and sexually active.” Finally Genesis 1 presents humans as the climax of creation, not as slaves to serve the gods, but in the image of God.

3. Upper and Lower Matters: Distinguish Between the Biblical Questions and the Pastoral Questions. This gets into questions of the continuum of views held by Christians (and non-Christians) on the questions of origins. It is helpful to present this as a continuum rather than a set of discrete positions. This can foster a profitable discussion on primary and secondary or even tertiary issues. The most significant message to come out of such a discussion is that doubts and questions need not be destructive. As Turner says “We still wrestle; we are not always sure; yet we remain committed to Christ.“

4. According to Their Kinds: Distinguish Between Scientific Categories and Biblical-Theological Categories. The point here is that Christians should look to the questions that the author was attempting to address in the text. The questions are often not the questions that we bring to the text … and thus the answers taken from the text are some ricochet off from the intended meaning. The author of Genesis was not addressing issues of modern science. The point of the text is theological.

5. Sources of Light: Using English translations. Turner suggests that it can be useful to compare multiple translations. The teams responsible have often come to different conclusions about the precise meaning of the Hebrew. Genesis 1:1 is an example here. The comparison can help the student or the lay Christian understand the places where the text is clear and where it is obscure. A careful reading of the text can also help us understand the questions asked and answered by the author. For example, Turner points out that the creation of light in day 1 is something of a conundrum. This is not because the sources are created later, but because the light is separated from darkness and identified with day and night. Thus, the intent (in agreement with John Walton’s reading) seems to be a creation of time and units of time, not the creation of light per se.

6. Features Above and Below: Here Turner emphasizes the importance of authorial intent, literary context, historical context, and theological context. He points out that Genesis 1 is prose, not poetry, but that is not the end of the matter. It is not as though poetry can be figurative but prose implies literal. Genesis 1 has a very different flavor from 2 Kings (his example) or even from Genesis 12. Earlier in his essay Turner referred to Genesis 1 as doxological narrative – and this distinction may be useful. The ultimate dividing line in figurative vs literal isn’t really poetry vs. prose, as though the intent can be determined through this particular argument.

7. Human Representatives: Providing Accessible Resources. A short annotated bibliography can be quite helpful, and guide the study of an interested student. (This, by the way, is the intent of my summaries under “Science & Faith” under the banner above.)

8. Rest: Patience is still a virtue. Relax, don’t panic. Be patient. Seek the right questions and allow the conversation to take place.

While Turner’s context is in the college classroom his approach seems to me to be more broadly applicable. This is the place to start – not with science or with what appears to many to be the apparent preeminence of scientific authority over Biblical authority.

What do you think?

Is there a place for this discussion within the church?

How and where can it be effectively broached and taught?

If you wish to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail [at] att.net.

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 17, 2013

4 Problems for the Pastor. 1: Discouragement

Next Post

December 17, 2013 Papers Be Gone?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was thrown into a muddy cistern for prophesying Jerusalem's fall?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Jeremiah Isaiah Baruch