Methodist, Jewish, Elder

Last updated on: November 6, 2013 at 5:05 am by Scot McKnight

Methodist, Jewish, Elder 2013-11-03T14:05:26-06:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Rebekah Simon-Peter, her new name, tells her story of moving from Reformed (liberal) Judaism into Orthodox Judaism into the Christian faith as a result of experiencing an appearance from Jesus in her book A Jew Named Jesus: Discover the Man and His Message. She’s now a Methodist elder/minister and working to reconcile communities in a ministry called BridgeWorks. She addresses classic questions from her own angle, an angle I’d call universalist and probably religiously pluralist. She doesn’t feel at home in either the Jewish community (because of Jesus) or the church (because she’s a Jew). Her husband is Catholic, she’s a Methodist. She is spiritual and religious.

A big difference for her revolves around the religion of Jesus vs. the religion about Jesus. (Nice try, I say to myself, but Jesus made too many self-claims for such a simplistic either/or.)

After telling her story, including the common pattern of wondering about her own experience while exploring what Christians believe by attending a seminary (Illiff), she explores a common question: Was Jesus a Christian? Well, Yes and No but her big theme is that Jesus was and remained thoroughly Jewish — he was Torah-observant Jew with Jewish parents and relations. His central teachings — like what I call the Jesus Creed — were Jewish. So, Jesus was a Jew. Never broke from Judaism even if he challenged it deeply.

Now comes a question with gravitas: Did the Jews reject Jesus? The style of many sermons, she rightly observes, is an “inclusive, loving, good (Christian) Jesus” vs. an “exclusive, narrow-minded, legalistic (Jewish) people” (38). Yes, she’s right, but one must let the rhetoric of Jesus (and Paul) carry some weight in their criticisms, not letting it become anti-Judaism or anti-Semitism. I included a sermon on the blog Sunday (3 November) where Jesus assails a Pharisee vs. a tax collector, stereotyping his way through the whole parable. That kind of rhetoric is typical in the Gospels. So I think she’s right in seeing Jesus’ rhetoric as family talk and not demonizing, and Yes the church has demonized Pharisees.

Some of Jesus’ followers were Pharisees; Jesus followed them in some ways (Matthew 23:1-3); some were Zealots; some were women; Pentecost expanded those followers but they were still very much expanding “Judaism” at some level — thousands opted for Jesus. Jews, she argues, were the makers of Christianity! Saul was as Jewish as one can get. Paul/Saul was, and apparently remained, a Pharisee (Acts 23:6). She thinks he was Torah observant. The issue then was whether or not Gentiles had to become Jews to be followers of Jesus/church people. Acts 15 shows they don’t have to become Jews; Gentiles are to be observant of the Torah at a Gentile level. Same today. Jesus was a hard man to follow; not all Jews — few in fact — followed him. For a variety of reasons. It was, however, a family feud and not a religious change. A major conclusion, though I can’t see that she says it quite this way, Jews as a whole did not reject Jesus; some did. One can’t blame Jews for rejecting Jesus. (That’s my reading of this chp.)

Deeper gravitas: Did the Jews kill Jesus? This theme is sometimes called the “longest hatred.” The badness of the rhetoric begins with Melito of Sardis (Jews were God-murderers) but it becomes stubbornly resistant to any change — for centuries Christians have painted Jews as those who killed Jesus. Chrysostom, Constantine, medieval (barbaric) laws, crusades, Spanish Inquisition, Martin Luther’s rantings and all the way to the Holocaust and Hitler.

Now the death of Jesus: she sees four themes — Jesus gave himself; God’s will; Rome killed him; Jewish leaders wanted him gone — all in an escalating condition of tension within Judaism and with Rome. Blaming the Jews is historically irresponsible; they are implicated in a complicated scene. Saying Jews killed Jesus is like saying white people killed ML King Jr (64). Furthermore, after probing the critical issues through some critical scholarship she concludes the Gospel evidence overstates Jewish involvement.

Rebekah, of course, denies any supersessionism in the Christian faith. She struggles with the apostle Paul, but finds some hope in Pam Eisenbaum and Mark Nanos. She observes many Christians read Paul through the dynamics of Martin Luther. Paul is not writing to Jewish believers but to Gentile believers. Gentiles and Jews make up the people of God, not in a zero-sum game but in an expansion of Israel.

One of her ways of framing a kind of universalism is this: “You can’t claim victory in Jesus while standing on the neck of your elder brother” (89).

She argues we need to embrace Jesus as fully Jewish, refocus on the kingdom of God (where and when God’s will is done), and here she suggests by focusing less on Jesus and more on social justice concerns, and by seeking a new heaven and a new earth (she has written about ecological concerns) — and here she moves into universalism of some sort. Jews, too, need to embrace Jewish followers of Jesus.

The book lacks sufficient attention to atonement, to the inaugurated/realized dimensions of eschatology in the christological claims of Jesus — as expounded well by DA Hagner, The Jewish Reclamation of Jesus, to the historic interpretations of the church (like the creed) … in short, the book falls short of an adequate study of the relations of Judaism and Christianity because it is designed by and for a more pluralist orientation, an orientation not held by the orthodox among Jews or Christians. I’m 100% in favor of reconciliation and mutual respect and civil dialogue, which this book exhibits, but the really difficult issues, the beliefs and practices and symbols and worldview that genuinely separate Judaism from Christianity, are by and large ignored in this book.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 6, 2013

Bible in Motion

Next Post

November 6, 2013 Chair Sitters: An Infographic

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which New Testament book is written entirely as a letter to an individual?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1 Timothy James Philemon Jude