Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Jesus Creed

Sacrificial Succession Leadership: Simon Rattray

Last updated on: October 7, 2012 at 12:59 pm   by Scot McKnight

Sacrificial Succession Leadership: Simon Rattray 2012-10-02T08:03:06-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is by Simon Rattray. Simon G. Rattray is a musician and Bible teacher who interprets culture from a Christian world-view. Simon has served as a pastor and a church planter. Simon currently works as a missions consultant, disability advocate and social researcher. During presentations, Simon shares his rare faith story that begins in the jungles of Borneo amongst head hunters.

What we have to look at here is a carefully thought out plan for succession… and it’s not easy and it needs to be examined more carefully. 

Does your church have a “sacrificial succession” plan?

Introduction and defining of terms

One of the greatest challenges for leadership today is the mushrooming Generation Y population. Of special concern to researchers is the weakness in certain contemporary leadership approaches, in particular, the capacity to hand over leadership to the younger generation.  George Barna argues that Baby Boomers find succession extremely difficult and he concludes that far too few young pastors are entering the ranks of church leadership. Reasons include (a more Builder pastors are often staying on to pastor well into their eighties (b an unusually high share of Boomer pastors are not retiring or planning to retire in their mid-sixties. More importantly, Barna’s findings suggest that succession planning is a glaring weakness in most Protestant denominations.

For the purposes of this review, the process of ‘handing over leadership’ or succession planning is defined as follows: a structured process involving the identification and preparation of a potential successor to assume a new role. By the term “structured,” succession is referred to as a process having some reliable structure and/or custom, thereby excluding from the definition the more ad hoc or “just-in-time” identification of successors.

The term “Sacrificial Succession,” can be defined as the direct consequence of the faithful application of Christ centred servant leadership. A ministry of servanthood and sacrificial succession are unnatural. They stand in sharp contrast to the dynastic and corporate successions commonly observed as succession norms today in many churches and ministries. Sacrificial Succession is the genuine outworking of servant leadership through the sacrificial handover of leadership by incumbent for successor success.

The research affirms that succession planning is not uncommon. What is uncommon are incumbents (a handing over leadership in a timely manner (b personally preparing successors (c sacrificing leadership for successors (d advocating for successors post succession.

The Sacrificial Succession of Jesus

Within the leadership of Jesus we see all four of the principles mentioned above occurring intentionally. The example of succession that Christ teaches is clearly brought to bear in Matthew 20:1-28 and the other gospel parallels; Mark 10:17-45, Luke 22:24-28, John 13:1-15, 14:26, 15:9-17 and 26-27.

In the Parable of the Vineyard Workers (Matthew 20:1-16) the first principle of Christ’s succession plan emerges. In verse 16, Jesus teaches that the choice of successors should not be based on performance and tenure. On the contrary; ‘the last will be first and first will be last’. Jesus’ qualification for leadership counters many corporate methods which are often appropriated for the benefit of an ‘aristocratic class’ who inherit leadership based on family ties or loyalty.The recognition of Paul as the Apostle to the Gentiles, despite his ‘unnatural birth’ (1 Corinthians 15:8-9), is evidence of this truth in practice.” Three key phases of sacrificial succession are clearly identifiable in the ministry of Jesus.                  

Ministry of preparation

As the time for the Lord’s departure draws closer, Jesus reminds his disciples of his impending death for a third time.  Here we see Jesus clearly preparing his successors for their succession prior to it occurring.  It is crucially important to recognize the fact that Jesus makes the timing of the leadership transition clear.  A glaring weakness within corporate successions is that the transition phase is often very unclear.  In John 15:15, Jesus explains this successional truth by considering his successors as friends rather than servants.  Jesus makes everything he has learned from his Father known to them.  Peter’s acceptance as leader by the early church and Jesus’ apparent reference to him as successor (Matthew 16:18-19, John 21:16), reinforces this important pre-succession truth.

Following the example of Jesus, sacrificial pre-succession ministry involves preparing successors, appointing a successor and predicting the timing of a succession well in advance of it occurring. Many potential successors, serve sacrificially yet with selfish ambitions. This often occurs because systematic successions are corporately inclined and modelled on Papal “conclaves.”

In (Matthew 20:20-23 and also Mark 10:35-40) the mother of James and John asks Jesus if her sons may receive favoured treatment in his succession.  Jesus rejects the request and in verses 25-28 he warns against the worldly standards seen in the corporate and dynastic successions of the day. Also see (Mark 10:42 and Luke 22:25).

Ministry of Sacrifice

An incumbent’s ministry cannot stop with servant leadership alone.  The incumbent must establish their true understanding of leadership and example through mediatory sacrifice for their successors.  It was the altruistic laying down of Jesus’ life for his friends (John 15:13) that most fully demonstrated this example. Thus, for a sacrificial succession to occur, a leader must lay down their leadership ambitions for the success of their successors. This is the principle missed by much of the leadership literature.  In so doing, the spiritual and practical truth underpinning Jesus’ sacrifice for us is maintained through sacrificial succession.  We are saved by grace not works (Ephesians 2:8-9), meaning that sacrificial successors are more than mere servant leaders who ‘give up to go up;’ a phrase coined by John Maxwell. Incumbents willingly and expressly sacrifice their leadership for the success of their successors.  A genuinely sacrificial succession cannot occur unless the sacrifice by incumbent for successor outweighs the sacrifice of successor for their succession**.**

Ministry of advocacy

The final aspect of sacrificial succession modelled by Jesus is his advocacy on our behalf through the ministry of the Holy Spirit.  The example here is that Christ voluntarily limits himself so that he can work through us. Jesus promises his disciples that he will not leave them to face things alone (John 14:18), and through the advocacy of the Holy Spirit, he will continue to remind them of his instructions (v14:26). The success of Jesus’ successors so to speak, was very much tied to their “abiding” in him (maintaining relationship) and the ongoing ministry of the Holy Spirit. This important spiritual truth applied practically in a post-succession context involves replaced leader staying on as advocate for successor. In staying on post-succession, the replaced leader maximises successor success, by teaching and reminding their successors about the importance of sacrificial succession and by helping them to prepare the next generation of successors. Succession literature has often argued that it is unhealthy for replaced leader to remain present in any capacity once the transition process is complete. However this is because they do not understand the sacrificial nature of succession modelled by Jesus.

Applying Sacrificial Succession

For a number of our projects I have prepared what we call “The Seven Steps of Sacrificial Succession.” For churches and other Christian organisations who are interested in applying Sacrificial Succession to their leadership transition, the seven main steps are laid out here.  These sacrificial succession steps are grouped into three transitional phases.  Phase one is the pre-succession ministry of preparation of successors for succession.  Next is the mediatory sacrifice by incumbent for successor, which defines the succession event.   The final post-succession phase is a mastery of advocacy by replaced leader for successor.

 Ministry of preparation (3½ years)

 

Mediatory sacrifice (six months)

 Mastery of advocacy (three years)

Conclusion

The Old Testament makes it very clear that when leadership development and succession planning were performed poorly or neglected the Israelites suffered through a succession of leaders who lost sight of the mission, oppressed God’s people and reverted to idol-worship.  The worse curse, which occasionally came to pass, is uttered in Isaiah 3:4, “I will make boys their officials, mere children will govern them.” It would be tragic if this prophecy came true for the church in the next generation**.**

Many leaders serve sacrificially yet they are failing to hand over leadership. The first clause of Matt 20:28 is often applied whilst the second is often neglected. Leadership cannot be properly understood outside of the context of sacrificial succession, which is the faithful application of Christ centred servant leadership. The mediatory sacrifice of Jesus and his ongoing advocacy for his successors following a ministry of successor preparation is the perfect illustration of succession and the answer to the contemporary leadership transition crisis.

Simon G. Rattray is a musician and Bible teacher who interprets culture from a Christian world-view. Simon has served as a pastor and a church planter. Simon currently works as a missions consultant, disability advocate and social researcher.

 During presentations, Simon shares his rare faith story that begins in the jungles of Borneo amongst head hunters

 

 

 

 

 

          

 

Pastoring and Leading

Previous Post



October 7, 2012

In the Footsteps of Jesus and the Apostles

Next Post



October 7, 2012 The Great Outdoors


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who were the first two sons of Adam and Eve?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaac and Ishmael Cain and Abel Jacob and Esau Seth and Enosh

Related posts from Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Why Proverbs?

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Why We Need Sages (The Wise)

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Where Have All the Skinny Jeans Pastors Gone?

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

The Renegade Pastor

Jesus Creed

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube