Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Jesus Creed

A New Kind of Apologetics

Last updated on: June 5, 2012 at 5:40 am   by Scot McKnight

A New Kind of Apologetics 2012-06-05T05:40:01-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Apologetics has changed. What has changed is the substance of what matters. Apologists used to focus on the evidence — think here of the wildly popular book of Josh McDowell, Evidence that Demands a Verdict — or on the logic of Christianity — and here one can mention C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, or the more forceful apologetics of  Edward J. Carnell or Cornelius van Til. This sort of apologetics remains viable and useful for some.

But for some an argument for the resurrection doesn’t do it or historical arguments about the Bible’s pages can’t get to the issue, while others think Lewis’ moral argument can be explained better in other ways. Perhaps it is wise to remember that apologetics tell us about the Age in which we live as much as they provide a coherent reason for the faith.

New age, new topics. In some ways the old apologetics are found in Jeffrey Burton Russell’s new book, Exposing Myths about Christianity: A Guide to Answering 145 Viral Lies and Legends, but in other ways Russell is offering one of the most interesting and (I predict) useful apologetics books I’ve seen in a long while. His topics, so I would argue, are closer to our Age and deal with issues I heard in classrooms and my office for seventeen years.

What are the big apologetic issues you hear about today? Which ones are page-turners, head-turners, or “solve this one for me”?

Russell is famous for his medieval histories, and also for his multi-volume study of Satan/the devil. He was a professor at UC Santa Barbara, and it would not be unfair to put him in the circle of some of America’s best-known historians. As a historian, he plies his trade to commonly heard accusations against Christianity by exposing them to the evidence. His topics, though, are not the norm and that is why I think this book belongs on the shelf of pastors and in church libraries, and I can’t imagine a youth pastor or college pastor/chaplain who wouldn’t find immediate value in this book.

The book is a short study of 145 different topics! That means it cannot be a complete answers, and it also means I can’t summarize it all or much of it, but it has collected the problems into a few major categories:

1. Christianity is dying out (1-9)
2. Christianity is destructive (10-43)
3. Christianity is stupid (44-62)
4. Jesus and the Bible have been shown to be false (63-83)
5. Christian beliefs have been shown to be wrong (84-121)
6. Miracles are impossible (122-125)
7. Worldviews can’t be evaluated (126-134)
8. What’s new is true (135-145)

Each topic is treated briefly; his approach is sane and reasonable and cautious and not predictable. He doesn’t have to answer to a church board or a creed, though what I have seen in this book is reasonably orthodox on the major issues. His responses are to the point, brief, and he moves on. (145 topics make one do that.)

As a sample: the first section deals with Christianity being uncool and old-fashioned (but it is true, he asks); it is outdated and dying out (neither is demonstrable); it is boring (he says it isn’t boring); a fairy tale (it is open for evaluation, so to the evidence we must go); confusing (properly understood, it is not confusing); a superstition (it is coherent); a myth (too complex and historical for that term); magic (it seeks not to control so much as to be in harmony with nature); antiscientific (issue is two metaphysical worldviews). I am being brief on someone who is being brief, and so these are not even adequate summaries … but you can get what he’s doing in this book by seeing these responses).

Apologetics

Previous Post



June 4, 2012

Adelaide to Sydney

Next Post



June 5, 2012 Evolution and the Creativity of God (RJS)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group is known for its rejection of military service and political involvement?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amish Baptist Assemblies of God Methodist

Related posts from Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Apologetics in a Bible of Paradox

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Is Faith Unintelligent? (Donald Nwankwo)

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Willard and the Problem of Evil

Jesus Creed

Evangelical

Willard's Beautiful Apologetics

Jesus Creed

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube