Saturday Book Review: Joe Canner

Last updated on: October 29, 2011 at 2:08 pm by Scot McKnight

Saturday Book Review: Joe Canner 2011-10-29T14:08:49-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Joe Canner, who did a good series for us on the economic crisis, here turns to Lee Camp’s book and the Muslim relations at work in international peace.

For the past few weeks, Scot has been going through Who Is My Enemy?: Questions American Christians Must Face about Islam–and Themselves, by Lee C. Camp, and looking at the themes of pacifism and Just War Theory. The discussions on these posts have been spirited and informative. Another theme of Camp’s book that was only discussed incidentally has to do with the relationship between Christian and Muslim doctrines on war and on how Christians can build bridges with Muslims despite the poisoned environment that has existed since 9/11.

Questions for the post: What do you think of the contention that Christian and Islamic doctrines of war, as currently practices, are logically similar? How should Christians respond? What is your experience with building bridges with Muslims? What are some practical steps that we as individuals or as a church to encourage this?

Much of Camp’s book is based on the premise that the Christian views of war are a product of the same logic the underlies the corresponding Muslim views. His reason for making this point is to discourage Christians from looking down on Muslims because of a supposedly superior view on war. In order to make this point he examines the history of both religions with respect to their views on war. Based both on Jesus’ words and deeds, the early Christian church was marked by non-violence and a general aversion to military service. Similarly, the early years of Islam, while Mohamed was in Mecca, were marked by nonviolence, and Qu’ranic verses composed during that period reflect this. Camp rightly notes, however, that Mohamed’s non-violence was strategic, since he did not actually have the means to wage war. In contrast, he contends that the Christian aversion to war was principled; both the teaching of Jesus and of the early Church fathers required Christians not only to avoid violence but to actively combat injustice with sacrificial love of one’s enemy (107).

As we all know, however, once Mohamed moved to Medina and gathered enough resources, he started to retaliate against his persecutors. Nonetheless, Camp notes that even during this period the Qu’ran contains admonitions against offensive war, against killing non-combatants, and against prolonging war after enemy surrender. Similarly, once Christians had access to the levers of power during the time of Constantine, it became necessary for Augustine to suggest some boundaries and regulations for war: what we now refer to as Just War Theory. This, Camp concludes, if we compare the early days of Christianity with the early days of Islam, we see that both were committed to non-violence, albeit for different reasons. Likewise, when both religions had the means to wage war, both developed doctrines designed to limit its extent. Unfortunately, both religions have seen periods throughout their histories in which the doctrines were not followed. Camp gives the Crusades, Native American genocide, Sherman’s March to the South, the Philippine-American War and the war in Iraq as but a few of many examples on the Christian side (chapter 11). And, of course, Muslim acts of terrorism, including 9/11 and suicide bombings in Israel, are well documented.

In addition to cautioning Christians against overselling the superiority of Christianity to Islam with respect to war theory, Camp suggests that we can learn from Muslims with respect to our understanding of the relationship between religion and the state. Camp notes that Americans have an impression regarding Muslims that they desire to turn America (and any other Western country in which they reside) into a theocracy. Americans believe that if Muslims would keep their religious beliefs private, just as Christians do, that everyone would get along just fine. He contends, however, that in so doing Christians have unwittingly ceded too much authority to the state. This has resulted throughout history in Christians waging war with other Christians because our loyalty to the state outweighs our responsibilities towards our fellow believers. Although Muslims are not immune to this problem, they tend in general to elevate their religious loyalty above their state loyalty and cannot understand how Christians have allowed ourselves to be co-opted by the state. Camp summarizes the problem:

[The church], rather than undercutting the powers that divide and alienate people, has often served and been used by the powers that divide and alienate. The state becomes that which demands our obedience, teaches its children to pledge its allegiance, wages war over artificial geographical boundaries, requires Iranians and Iraqis and Germans and Americans to kill one another, and requires them to set aside a higher allegiance, whether Muslim or Christian. (34)

The last few chapters of the book provide some practical ways in which Christians can build bridges with Muslims and, in so doing, overcome the violence and hatred that characterizes the typical American view of Islam. Camp notes that, if nothing else, Christians and Muslims are united by an ancient culture that valued hospitality over almost all else. Christians can see this hospitality played out in the story of Abraham, who entertained angels unawares, on through to Jesus who ate with those who were shunned by society. The Arab culture which gave birth to Islam shares these same values with respect to hospitality. Camp notes that “the table embodies a special place of grace, in which the reconciliation offered by God to the world may be made manifest.” (132) He suggests that Christian hospitality towards Muslims has the potential to have a much more profound impact than any attempts to dominate Islam with violence. Based on his personal experiences sharing meals with Muslims he shows how we can better understand the Muslim story and share in the struggle against violent elements in both religions.

One way in which war theory plays out in Christian-Muslim dialogue has to do with the Muslim view of the crucifixion. Muslims believe that God would not have allowed a great prophet, let alone the Son of God, to suffer an ignominious death on the cross. Such a death, according to Muslims, would have brought great shame and dishonor to God. Camp contends that the Christian focus on the doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement, in which Jesus’ death pays the penalty for the sin of mankind, has obscured the fact that many early Christians saw the crucifixion as the victory of humble suffering over imperial violence and coercion. In other words, Christ preached non-violence and non-retaliation, and his crucifixion vindicates and bears witness to the ultimate power of those words. When we ignore that interpretation of the cross and engage in violence, Camp says, we deny “the ethical relevance of the crucified Jesus,” which is no different than a Muslim denying the historical fact of the crucified Jesus. (146)

Camp closes the book by encouraging Christians to have the courage both to break down barriers between Christianity and Islam and to speak out against violence and hatred. He notes that in this way Christians can truly illustrate how Christianity differs from Islam:

…that victory and triumph come not through a simple historical victory over the powers of injustice through justifiable use of the sword, but through cross and resurrection. But this notion…frightens me. I find the Muhammad story very compelling: carefully, and with equity, retaliate against those who oppress and persecute. Justice, as well as love for oneself and one’s neighbors, requires it. Yet the Jesus story proclaims that Jesus’s faithfulness unto death—and the vindication of his faithfulness in the resurrection—prescribes a different way. And if we believe that story to be true, then it provides the antidote to our slavery and bondage to fear….If death has been defeated through suffering love and resurrection, then we who also love in this way, and potentially suffer in this way, need neither be enslaved by fear nor propagate fear. (151-152)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 29, 2011

So, What's for Breakfast?

Next Post

October 29, 2011 Hillbilly Ten Commandments

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the Roman governor who sentenced Jesus to be crucified?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Felix Pontius Pilate Herod Agrippa