Tom Wright, Scriptural Authority, and Monogamy

Last updated on: June 6, 2011 at 5:34 am by Scot McKnight

Tom Wright, Scriptural Authority, and Monogamy 2011-06-01T11:54:03-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What does it mean to claim the Bible is authoritative? We can turn this inside out with this: How do we frame the authority of the Bible? Is it as simple as “the Bible says it, do it”? Or … and this is why so many of us value the voice of Tom Wright in this discussion. His newest book, Scripture and the Authority of God: How to Read the Bible Today, is both a revision and an expansion of his former book The Last Word, and it examines the authority of God in the Bible. Two examples are used, and we looked at one last Wednesda (Sabbath) and today we examine his second example: Monogamy.

Where in the Bible do you think it says marriage is designed exclusively as one man and one woman?

It is not just that the OT has some “famous biblical polygamists,” people who are used by polygamists as support for their polygamy (because they think the Bible is authoritative), but there are laws that assume polygamy. It won’t do, then, just to say “those polygamists were wrong.” It’s one thing to have a bad example in a story; it’s another to have laws that seemingly underwrite or at least assume polygamy. So, we’ve got Deuteronomy 21:15-17:

15 If a man has two wives, and he loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons but the firstborn is the son of the wife he does not love, 16 when he wills his property to his sons, he must not give the rights of the firstborn to the son of the wife he loves in preference to his actual firstborn, the son of the wife he does not love. 17 He must acknowledge the son of his unloved wife as the firstborn by giving him a double share of all he has. That son is the first sign of his father’s strength. The right of the firstborn belongs to him.

As I argued in**The Blue Parakeet: Rethinking How You Read the Bible** , this is just the sort of “blue parakeet” passage that gets us to think more carefully about how we read the Bible. What does Wright say then?

First, we need to realize there are lots of polygamists in the Bible and they are not condemned always, and we need to realize that just because it’s in the Bible doesn’t mean it’s authoritative (or normative, or prescriptive), but that doesn’t really solve the problem. Polygamy’s presence in the laws means it can’t be dismissed as easily.

Second, something is at work in the Pauline Pastoral epistles’ statements about leaders that states that monogamy is the norm: 1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:6. Tom understands “one woman man” (NIV has “faithful to his wife”) to be “non polygamous.” This implies some are polygamous; it implies also that the Christians stand for something else: monogamy.

Third, the NT is stricter at times the OT — and this undercuts the argument that the OT was law and the NT grace and soft.

Why? That’s his fourth point, and it’s the critical one: the project of God in God’s mission for the world is to restore creation into new creation, and the original creation was the marriage of one man and one woman.

Fifth, and here some will disagree: both Jesus and Paul make the Mosaic laws temporary dispensations. I quote Tom on Jesus (and here Jesus is talking to Jews, not Gentiles): “Jesus is saying [in “Moses gave you that command … but from the beginning of creation…”] that the entire Mosaic code was, in principle, a temporary dispensation, designed to advance a larger project which has now arrived…” (188). And “with his arrival the temporary dispensation of the Mosaic Law… has done its God-given job.” Creation gives way to new creation and when it does, we are to “read the specific codes of the Old Testament as provisional and [a] temporary means to that larger end.”

God thus overlooked the times of ignorance. New creation establishes monogamy. We cannot read the Bible in the flat but as “a story with different movements” (194).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 6, 2011

God Behaving Badly 6

Next Post

June 6, 2011 Is Adoption a Trend or Trendy?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God use to lead the Israelites by day?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A pillar of fire A pillar of cloud An angel A trumpet