Church in the Present Tense (by Jonny Baker)

Last updated on: March 26, 2011 at 12:45 pm by Scot McKnight

Church in the Present Tense (by Jonny Baker) 2011-03-26T12:45:46-05:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I swiped this review by Jonny Baker from this site [perhaps I should write jonnybaker]. Good discussion there, but maybe we can move it to the USA here at Jesus Creed. Bias alert: I wrote two chps in this book, one on Scripture and one on Atonement/Gospel, so this is more than just a review for me. I’m vested. But this is a fair review, focusing on Jason Clark’s pieces.

kevin corcoran has brought groups of students from calvin college to the uk a few times now beginning around 3 years back i think. the group have visited various christian communities/churches and been to grace a couple of times. as part of that they conducted a series of interviews on film. i was interviewed at the time – it seems a while back now…

anyway all that by way of an intro to say that kevin has pulled together a new book – Church in the Present Tense: A Candid Look at What’s Emerging – which i sense has emerged from those visits, conversations and reflections on mission. it landed on my doormat last weekend and even though i had other things to do i found myself making a coffee and reading it through pretty much straight away. it has four authors each of whom contribute 2 chapters. the authors are kevin, jason clark, pete rollins and scot mcknight. then there’s a dvd with interviews with the likes of pete, me , kester, jason, and rowan williams. i feel almost embarrassed writing this list and have to get this out of the way up front – with a title like church in the present tense why are none of the authors or interviews with women?! ouch… if you’ve seen or been involved in the comments on the new monasticism review/post it won’t surprise you me mentioning it. it was the first thing i noticed and i just think it is such a shame and will probably reduce the readership of the book.

anyway that’s a bit of a negative opening comment but i enjoyed the book. i liked the stance of the book – it is holding open different perspectives on theology, mission and church that clearly disagree with one another in places but are trying to talk about it honestly. that’s refreshing (though i think it might have been improved if authors had a chance to comment in some way on the other chapters). so for example kevin gets into philosophy (philosophy is not my hot area i confess) to debate philosophical realism – he suggest that the emerging conversation needs humility about truth claims but that doesn’t mean you can’t say things that are real – for example jesus christ is risen from the dead. i am sure there will be more conversation about this. it’s a critique of pete and caputo amongst others i think. it did make me think that the emerging conversation probably gets caricatured as being into this debate much more than it is. or maybe it is a bigger debate in the US. there’s a small subset who read the likes of derrida and zizek and heidegger but a huge number who probably don’t (i have read none of them) but sense that postmodern cultures definitely throw up some new questions around truth. this chapter is one of two in a section on philosophy – pete writes the other. then there are scetions on theology, worship and bible and doctrine.

i found jason clark’s chapters interesting. this is probably because i haven’t read too much of his wriitng and his tradition is very different to mine – he is from a baptist/vineyard church planting background. in his first chapter he considers consumer culture and its formative impact on our lives. he suggests it is no less than a religious way of life, like a perverse liturgy that shapes us. i am sure he’s right – i have no doubt that we are all co-opted in our worldviews, practices and imaginations much more than we would like to think by consumer culture and its logic. that logic places me at the centre of the universe constructing my lifestyle out of consumer choices and tastes. he raises questions about how that sort of imagination collides with the grammar of church and the counter cultural imagination of a life informed by the scriptures and the christian community asking where identity is formed. jason lays some critiques particularly at those who have stepped in some way outside of church and into what he calls private god spaces from where they offer critiques of church but without any embodied concrete missional or church life. he suggests deep church is the way forward – by which he means locating in the traditions and history of the church and not leaving it in the name of pragmatism or mission in search for the latest model. he also issues a challenge to stop problematising church and seek its wellness. he loves church – we probably need more people around who do! i have a guy on the course i’m teaching who is refreshing in the same way and is forever saying how much he loves church. i welcomed these challenges and need to ponder them some more. but had a few thoughts in response…

the first is a bit tongue in cheek but having lambasted the process of ‘organic’ ‘cell’ ’emerging’ or whatever as consumer solutions or fads to then propose another – ‘deep church’ – seemed a bit ironic, a bit rich! it is awfully close to another consumer fad – there are already books on it, conferences, blogs, and money to be made. it also doesn’t sound too different to me than what i have perceived already as being sensibilities of many involved in the emerging church – at least in the uk a lot is located in and out of the historic denominations and drawing on the ancient practices.

secondly whilst i totally agree about the challenges of consumerism and formation i worry about the solution being offered – a different grammar and identity formation that is counter cultural. i do think a grammar is important. the key question is what is that grammar and how is it imagined – i guess i am asking not just how formation happens but what kind of formation. many strands or denominations of church articulate this sort of approach – whether the brethren or mennonites or anglican community or whatever. what they do is create a strong sense of community and with a grammar that has identity in it. so people experience formation but it often forms them in a way in my view that is too disengaged from the wider culture. i am finding it hard to describe what i sense here. what i have loved about the alternative worship movement and i think why it inspired me originally is that it had a very different instinct around culture (which has been formative in me) – a much more sacramental view of popular culture. so by being part of it i have found that i am formed in a way that does give me a grammar of the christian story and discipleship but it has formed me in a way to discern the presence of god within culture not apart from it. that’s why some of the things jason critiques – trickster, starfish and spider i have no problem with as being sources of inspiration and sites for theological reflection. somehow i think you need grammar as jason is suggesting, but i don’t think saying you need grammar goes far enough – let’s have grammar that shapes people in christian identity but in a way that empowers them to live in the culture.

jason loves the local church and that is classic baptist ecclesiology so it makes perfect sense and it’s great. local church needs advocates. but i perceive an inherent criticism of others that are focused in other ways in mission.what i was arguing before in the review of new monasticism is that church needs both local and movement expressions (sodal and modal). the local congregation is not the be all and end all – it is important and i am part of one but i find my life in mission enriched and fueled by being part of cms for example which is itself an expression of church as a spread out community. i am also intrigued by some of jason’s critique – how many people are there who are proposing a way forward for the emergng church who don’t see being part of an embodied actual community as essential? i am sure there are some but i don’t know of many.

his second chapter is on worship. this connects strongly with the first. he has discovered a rhythm and grammar in liturgy, in the church calendar, in the seasons of lent and advent, in the eucharist, in catechism. this is a very different place to where he started in baptist and then vineyard worship and i am guessing is probably somewhat shocking to those who knew him there. having grown up in the anglican church myself i grew up with this grammar or rhythm of liturgy in the church – this is the kind of grammar/shape that we use in grace and i think many others have rediscovered as treasure in the traditions that perhaps they were shunning in the seventies and beyond. i hope these can continue to be opened up imaginatively. i recently read jamie smith’s book desiring the kingdom which i have been meaning to review and haven’t had time to. there is a chapter in there on worship that is making a very compelling argument similar to jason. my reaction to that though and to this was – it’s not enough on its own. this is very similar to what i have tried to say above. when i read jamie’s book i was thinking of the life of worship at a traditional denominational theological seminary for example – it ticks the boxes of what he suggests but i still have huge questions about it. it seems to form people in a particular religious way that can be cut off from engagement in mission with culture. so i think it’s needed and am on a similar journey to jason and jamie albeit i started much closer to it by being part of a denominational church. but this kind of formation also needs some good mission thinking and cultural theology alongside it (which i have no doubt jason’s church embody so it’s not a critique of that). so it sound great and i agree but i am also a bit cautious. we need some more thinking and conversation about formation.

i won’t engage any other chapters as this review has already extended beyond what i imagined i’d write but have a read of the book, see what you think. i should mention the dvd – rowan’s interview is the most interesting – probably because he has a far bigger brain than the rest of us. he has a very interesting and simple answer to what church is – church is what happens when people encounter the risen jesus christ. institution is something that comes much later…

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 26, 2011

Weekly Meanderings

Next Post

March 26, 2011 The Borg is Coming

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group refers to their leaders as "General Superintendents"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nazarene Orthodox Methodist Catholic