An Afternoon With John Polkinghorne (RJS)

Last updated on: February 10, 2011 at 7:01 am by RJS

An Afternoon With John Polkinghorne (RJS) 2011-02-10T07:01:24-06:00 RJS

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In this post today I would like to point to a video featuring Rev. Dr. John Polkinghorne. Dr. Polkinghorne was a very successful scientist, an expert and creative theoretical physicist involved in the discovery of quarks. He was Professor of Mathematical Physics at Cambridge University before he resigned to study for the priesthood. He has since been a parish priest, Dean of the Chapel at Trinity Hall Cambridge and President of Queen’s College, Cambridge. After retirement he continues to write, think, and lecture about the interface between science and faith. I’ve read and commented on a couple of his books – Quarks, Chaos & Christianity and Belief in God in an Age of Science. I hope to read, and perhaps comment on, more of his work.

In this video of a lecture and interview at Point Loma Nazarene University Dr. Polkinghorne discussed the relationship between science and religion.

Polkinghorne covers a number of topics in his lecture – but the general thread of the first portion is a discussion of the questions asked by science, the questions asked by religion, and the gifts that each give to the other.

Is it sufficient to attribute some kinds of “pain and suffering” to the way God created the world for his good purpose? Does this cause a problem in our understanding of God or does it shape our understanding of God?

And on a slightly different note,

Does the beauty of creation – including music, art, and mathematics – point you toward God?

A paraphrase of some of his discussion follows, but the entire lecture is worth listening to.

According to Polkinghorne science and religion are both concerned with truth, but they are asking different questions about the world. Science is asking a single question about how things happen. But there are many other questions science does not address; questions of meaning, value, and purpose. The distinction can be categorized as the distinction between how and why. Science asks how questions, religion asks why questions. This is something of a broad brush, without all of the necessary nuance. But it is, he feels, a useful distinction.

We don’t have to choose between how and why. The insights of science and religion complement each other. They address a different level of our experience of reality. Science is objective and considers the world as an “it.” But there is another realm of contact in relationship – our encounter and relationship with reality. One that science cannot effectively address. The answers a science-only approach yields are inherently unsatisfactory. A religion-only approach gives a global “how” (God did it) but doesn’t really address, and doesn’t need to address, the detailed questions of how.

The answers to the how and why questions are consonant – friends, but in dialog. One doesn’t trump the other. Science can’t be enough – an objective “how” answer is not enough. Music, for example, can be described scientifically as a neural response to the impact of sound waves on the eardrum – this is an objective how answer. Of course, this scientific description hardly exhausts the mystery of music … there is so much more to the sequence of sounds in time as they are perceived.

The gift from science to religion – science tells us about the character of the world in which we live, and the history of the universe. This is a revelation of God’s creation. Not all truth will come through science, but some does. In particular, the insights arising from an understanding of evolution should be viewed as gifts in our understanding of God’s creation. A deist spectator God is a God that fills a scientific gap – the theist God creates for a purpose, a mission, and a relationship. His ways are good even if we don’t always understand – and this includes the ability of creation to flower through change and growth.

About 18 minute into the video Polkinghorne uses the example of evolution and cancer to suggest how science might give an important insight into God’s creation and plan. This seems counter intuitive, but is worth thinking about. The fact that somatic cells can mutate is a necessary consequence of a creation where the realm of diversity is explored through evolutionary mechanism, mutations and selection. We think we could do it better – throw out the nasty things and keep the nice things. But the more science teaches us about the way things actually work the better we understand God’s creation and realize that the good and the bad in this sense are necessarily intertwined.

Religion gives a gift to science – not by answering scientific questions, as a rival to science – but by assessing scientific insights in a broader context. One such question are “why is science possible?” Our depth of understanding of science goes far beyond what is necessary for survival of an organism. Mathematics provides the key that unlocks our understanding of creation. There is an aesthetic pleasure – a beauty – in the mathematics that describes the universe. This is a beauty that rivals the aesthetic pleasure and beauty of music and art. “Ugly” equations and theories are not effective – they don’t have deep explanatory power. There is a deep satisfying aesthetic beauty to the theory of the universe.

Polkinghorne suggests that it is intellectually lazy to simply stop with “that is the way it is.” The common origin in the mind of the creator provides a ground for understanding the beauty of creation. Science is possible because the word is a creation and we are creatures made in the image of the creator. Mathematics comes alongside music, art, and other expressions of beauty and meaning to point us toward God.

There are some interesting ideas here, worth discussion. One that strikes me in particular is the notion of a creation free to grow and develop, and this will mean some presence of pain and suffering – from cancer to tsunamis to birth defects to trees that topple and hill. No human sin involved. This strikes home after having attended a funeral in early January of a woman a few years younger than I am who died of cancer, leaving a husband and four children, and knowing others who have struggled with cancer, both successfully and unsuccessfully. Is it sufficient to say that this is the way the world was created?

Polkinghorne’s discussion of beauty in the theoretical, mathematical explanation of the world is also worth some discussion. I agree with him here, there is a beauty and a depth to the coherence of all creation that rivals music and art in its aesthetic power. It is overwhelming at times and makes science fun. I am not pursuing science for practical empirical benefit, but for the depth of understanding provided. So two questions:

And on a slightly different note,

Does the beauty of creation – including music, art, and mathematics – point you toward God?

If you wish to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail[at]att.net

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

Science and Faith

John Polkinghorne

Previous Post

February 10, 2011

On Writing Well

Next Post

February 10, 2011 Top Chef Biased?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which is the only book that does not mention "God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lamentations Song of Solomon Esther Ezra