Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Jesus Creed

Home
Evangelical
Evolutionary Creation 4 (RJS)

Evolutionary Creation 4 (RJS)

Last updated on: December 9, 2010 at 3:16 pm by RJS

Evolutionary Creation 4 (RJS) 2010-12-09T15:16:21-06:00 RJS

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’ve been working through Denis O. Lamoureux’s book Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution – a book that describes a way to move beyond the creation and evolutions debates. In the posts Tuesday we discussed the question of divine action in creation. Today we will look at another topic from the third chapter of the book, The Creator in a Designed and Evolving Universe. After his discussion of divine action Dr. Lamoureux covers the question of intelligent design in creation. This topic is sure to incite some difference in opinion and perspective – it should be exciting. (He also has a good discussion of the anthropic principle – but this we’ve discussed in the past, and Dr. Lamoureux offers no significantly different perspective, so I am not going to revisit it in the context of this book.)

Dr. Lamoureux points to Psalm 19 and Romans 1 in describing the features of intelligent design in creation. First Psalm 19:1-4 (NASB)

The heavens are telling of the glory of God;

And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands.

Day to day pours forth speech,

And night to night reveals knowledge.

There is no speech, nor are there words;

Their voice is not heard.

Their line has gone out through all the earth,

And their utterances to the end of the world

Five features of natural revelation are identified in this passage. It is active, intelligible, incessant, universal, and divine. The creation is active as it tells and declares, the message is intelligible as it reveals knowledge, the declaration is incessant day to day and night to night, it is universally available through all the earth to the end of the world, and it is divine or transcendent being written in the heavens and expanse.

Romans 1:18-23 affirms these five features and adds a sixth – the natural revelation in creation judges. Here we see not only the nature of general revelation in creation, but the consequence of this revelation. Natural revelation is not merely awe at the majesty and intricacy of the world, but is written into our being as moral understanding.

What do conclusions do you draw from these passages.

What are the features of design in the world around us?

Dr. Lamoureux takes his discussion of design in creation one step further with a position that he admits is somewhat controversial. Intelligent design in creation is conclusive to the point of legal, but not mathematical, certainty – it is not proven, yet it is beyond a reasonable doubt. When the intelligent design embedded in creation is not seen for what it is, pointing to God, the reason is is not the insufficiency of natural revelation, but the impact of sin on human thinking. Spiritual state shapes the receptiveness to design.

In refusing to acknowledge God, religious skeptics need to concoct reasons to explain away the powerful impact of intelligent design in order to maintain their own psychological stability and comfort. However, the Bible affirms the sufficiency of nonverbal revelation in nature, and the proficiency of the human mind to understand it fully, if used judiciously. I contend that a fair and honest assessment of the character of the physical world leads to the truth that design is real and that it reflects the general characteristics of an Intelligent Designer. (p. 75)

Dr. Lamoureux is not looking for gaps in the current or potential explanatory power of evolutionary biology. In fact he suggests that looking to undermine evolution in order to prove design misunderstands the nature of the design. The concept of design is not defended by opposing evolution but by looking, with eyes that can see, at all of the world around us. There is a balance between artistic character and engineered character that points to design and Designer; beauty, harmony, and utility all play a role.

To flesh this out a bit Dr. Lamoureux makes the following points about a biblically based view of design in creation (p. 78-79):

The artistic and engineered features in nature are not proof for intelligent design. In fact the search for proof “overlooks the fact that there is an intellectual-spiritual jump from the physical evidence to its metaphysical assessment.”

The world is not merely suggestive of or consistent with design and a designer. To water down the claim to this level is inconsistent with scripture – especially Psalm 19 and Romans 1. “Moreover, these epistemological positions fail to recognize human experience throughout history. Every generation has been powerfully impacted by nature, and almost everyone has accepted that it affirms the existence of an Intelligent Designer.”

Romans 1 states that all are without excuse. “Thus natural revelation is within the intellectual grasp of humans in such a way that we are all accountable for its identification and implication.”

These three points lead to an important conclusion …”intelligent design in nature is knowable by all men and women to the certainty level of an argument. This knowledge is neither absolutely certain nor merely arbitrary. Rather, everyone is responsible for dealing with design and its consequences.” There is a metaphysical jump from evidence to the meaning, to religious assessment, but the leap is based on reason and logic. We have the ability to assess the artistic and engineered aspects of creation, but this ability is impeded by the impact of sin on human reason. Here Dr. Lamoureux points in particular to the first and second commandments – “You shall have no other gods before Me. You shall not make for yourself an idol.” Anyone or anything placed worshiped before God will cloud the ability to recognize purpose and design in the world.

He summarizes:

In sum, evolutionary creation presents an ontologically balanced model of intelligent design that is epistemologically rooted in human accountability before God. It affirms both the sufficiency of natural revelation and the proficiency of men and women to understand the non-verbal Message written into nature. This approach to design is consistent with Christian tradition and is based firmly upon the Bible. Evolutionary creationists view modern science as a gift from God and contend that as scientists probe deeper into the physical world, greater and more magnificent revelations of the Creator’s glory, power, and divinity will emerge. This origins position asserts that the evolutionary sciences are also a divine blessing. Evolutionary creation predicts that as these disciplines advance, discoveries will reveal a design-reflecting world that features unimaginably more planning and splendor than previously believed in earlier generations. (p. 81)

There are some interesting thoughts here, well worth considering, so lets start a conversation.

What do you think of this view of intelligent design in creation? Does it go far enough? Too far?

Does sin color human ability to recognize God’s artistic and engineered design in the world around us?

It you wish to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail[at]att.net

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

For those who find the full book (400+ pages) somewhat daunting Dr. Lamoureux has condensed the book into a more accessible version, I Love Jesus & I Accept Evolution. He also provides audio and slide summaries of each chapter of Evolutionary Creation online.

Picture Credit: Jeff Hester and Paul Scowen (Arizona State University), and NASA (public domain). Star-Birth Clouds in M16: This eerie, dark structure is a column of cool molecular hydrogen gas and dust that is an incubator for new stars. The color image is constructed from three separate images taken in the light of emission from different types of atoms. Red shows emission from singly-ionized sulfur atoms. Green shows emission from hydrogen. Blue shows light emitted by doubly- ionized oxygen atoms.

Science and Faith

Denis Lamoureux

Evolutionary Creation

Previous Post

December 9, 2010

Churches need more focus on Marriage

Next Post

December 9, 2010 Ron Santo-isms #10

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do for His disciples at the Last Supper?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Washed their feet Gave them money Fed them fish Sent them away