QE (Michael Kruse)

Last updated on: November 18, 2010 at 9:00 am by Scot McKnight

QE (Michael Kruse) 2010-11-18T09:00:44-06:00 Scot McKnight

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Quantitative what? Quantitative easing? What’s that? Recently the Federal government decided to do some quantitative easing to stimulate the economy. One thing we try to do on this blog is keep ourselves informed of such matters, and so I’ve asked our blog companion…

Michael Kruse to write this post to help us understand what’s going on with the printing of new money.

Those of you who are economists might want to come at this from your angle and help the discussion.

Why are we talking about “printing more money” to help the economy? The technical term for the proposed action is “quantitative easing.” Quantitative easing is a measure used by central banks to increase the money supply in the economy. “Quantitative” because it increases the amount of money. “Easing” because it loosens the seized up money flow in the economy.

Central banks (the Federal Reserve Board in the USA) aim for a balance of solid economic growth (with high employment) and minimal inflation. The challenge is that these two factors tend to work against each other. A key to achieving a balance is to keep the supply of money in the economy at a similar ratio to the value of all goods and services over time.

Imagine being at an auction with a large group of people. There will be a fixed amount of money “chasing” the fixed amount of goods being sold at the auction. Now say we go around and put an extra $100 in everyone’s pocket. The quantity of goods remains the same, but as people bid for the goods the prices will inflate. People have more dollars to bid with. If we take $100 away from everyone, then the prices will deflate. Of course, things are not this static in an economy. The value of available goods coming to market is always fluctuating.

Typically, the central bank uses three tools to manage the cost and supply of money. The central bank can raise the interest rate it charges to lend money to banks. That makes lending more costly and constricts the amount of money that flows in the economy. Lowering the rate will have the opposite effect. The central bank may also change the percentage of money that banks must keep in reserve in relation to what they lend. A higher ratio makes less money available and a lower ratio means more money available.

The third means of influencing the money supply is the Federal Open Market Committee (FMOC). The central bank sells government securities to the public. That pulls money out of the economy into the central bank. Interest rates rise and the dollar rises on foreign exchange markets. Consumption and investment decrease while net exports also decrease. Aggregate demand decreases causing real GDP growth and inflation to slow down. If the central bank wants to accomplish the opposite of this cascade of events, it buys securities from the public, which drops interest rates; causes the dollar to fall; consumption, investment, and net exports increase; aggregate demand increases … all resulting in GDP growth with more inflation.

As you may have noticed, the economy hasn’t been doing so well the last two years. The president and congress have used fiscal policy to stimulate economic growth. They spent large sums of borrowed money in an effort to stimulate the economy. Other options might include tax cuts, which leave more money in the hands of the private sector. That leaves more money in the hands of consumers to spend and it leaves more money in the hands of investors, thus decreasing the cost of money used in enterprise. But like stimulus spending, it also means greater deficits and more debt (assuming no significant cuts are made in government spending.) Whether through stimulus spending or reduced taxation, the strategy is to incur debt in the near term with the expectation that stimulated economic growth will compensate for the debt in the future.

So why are we talking about quantitative easing? Other options have been exhausted and the Federal Reserve believes it needs to do more. There is disagreement and fatigue among government leadership with regard to stimulus spending and taxation. The central bank has been cutting tax rates to near zero and you can’t cut lower than zero. There is only so much you can do with fractional reserves. And still the growth is very weak with insufficient job creation.

Quantitative easing is the exceptional measure the Federal Reserve is pursuing. The Fed credits itself with more money … technically not “printing money,” but similar. It uses the new money to buy bonds, equities, houses, and the like … driving up their prices. A bound bond comes with a fixed rate of interest, but how much people pay for a bond varies. If I have a bond for $1,000 that pays 5%, and I sell it to you for $1,100 dollars, then you are still only going to get 5% of $1,000 (or $50). Fifty dollars is a smaller fraction of $1,100 than of $1,000 , so the effect is that it has made it cheaper to sell bonds. Equities rise, making it easier to do stock offerings, and housing prices rise, making real estate more attractive to sell. Through impacts like these, quantitative easing increases the amount of money circulating and increases the money available for lending in the credit markets, while also stimulating rising prices in some key markets.

But let it be noted that quantitative easing is controversial with many economists. You have to hit the amount of money you pump into the system just right. If you pump in too little, then government ends up having purchased a great deal of debt that will have to be paid with future tax revenues … causing even a greater drag on the economy … and no economic benefit to show for it. If the assets purchased continue to deteriorate in value in a weakening economy, then you get an even worse impact. If you pump too much in, then you can spark hyperinflation. That is why it is seen as an extraordinary measure.

For a more authoritative resource, you might want to check out a description of “quantitative easing” at the Financial Times.

Public Issues

Michael Kruse

Quantitative Easing

Previous Post

November 17, 2010

Obama, Federal Aid, Faith-based Orgs

Next Post

November 18, 2010 The Age to Come - New Creation After Darwin (RJS)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Acts of the Apostles Adam Advent Anabaptism Angels Anglican Apologetics Atonement Baptism BCP Prayers Bible Biblical Studies Birds Blogging Bloglossary Bonhoeffer Books Calvinism Christianity Church Church History Coffee Colossians Commentary Recs Conversion Creation Creeds Culture Death Ecclesiastes Economics Education Embracing Grace Emergent Emerging Movement Eschatology Essays Ethics Eucharist Evangelicalism Family Fasting Fathers Fellowship of Differents Footsteps Tour Fun and Whimsical Gospel Grace Happiness Heaven Hell Holy Spirit Irenaeus James Jesus Jesus Creed Job Justification Kingdom of God Law Lectures Lent Liberalism Love and Marriage Mabanteneni Manhood Mary Miracles Missio Alliance MissioLife Missional Missional Jesus Movies and Film New Perspective Northern Seminary OneLife Origins Project Orthodox Parables Pastor's Spouse Pastoring and Leading Pastoring and Preaching Patristics Paul Paul-John Tour Pharisees Pietism Political Theology Prayer and Formation Preaching Problems for Faith Psalm 119 Psalms Public Issues Purgatory Religions Resurrection Revelation Romans Rule of JCreed Science and Faith Sermon on the Mount Sports Ten Commandments Theology Third Way Top Ten Lists Translations Uncategorized Universalism University Ministry Way Out Weekly Meanderings Wisdom Women and Ministry Work Worship Writing & Blogging Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2021 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What nation took Israel into captivity in 722 BC?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Egypt Babylon Assyria Persia